What is it?
Are these books below from who they say they are? I don’t know. But it is plausible, given the uniqueness, quality, and breadth of the material; if they’re not the Illuminati then they might as well be the Illuminati.
The e-books below are the best critique and summary of philosophy, science, psychology, etc., that exists in the world and I am hoping to find other avid readers, and to promote avid readership, of the material and find some other rational minds to consider the material with (I will discuss the prerequisites for doing so below). You can get their books from Amazon and they are in e-format for e-readers only; it is worth the investment if you don’t already have one, or you can read them on your PC or your phone app. They write under the pseudonyms of “Mike Hockney”, “Michael Faust” and “Adam Weishaupt”.
This is Hockney’s page on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Mike-Hockney/e/B004KHR7DC/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1
Michael Faust’s:
http://www.amazon.com/Michael-Faust/e/B004LXBBUA/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1
Adam Weishaupt’s:
http://www.amazon.com/Adam-Weishaupt/e/B004LXB8GW/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1
Aside from the list of books below, it is very helpful to read these books in chronological order of publication date, because concepts and information is developed in sequence.
This is the first book from “Adam Weishaupt”:
Jesus, Prince of Hell
The first book from “Michael Faust”:
The Right-Brain God
The first book from “Mike Hockney”:
Prohibition A
(which is a “fiction”).
The list below is their “God Series” (written by Hockney) which should only be read after reading all of the other books before them, and then in chronological order because they are an ongoing development of the concepts:
The God Factory
The God Game
The Last Man Who Knew Everything
Hyperreality
The God Blunder
The God Equation
The God Secret
Hyperreason
I read “The God Factory” first, before the earlier books from the other authors, and didn’t understand or agree with it very much, so I then read all of their other books in chronological order and came back to finish this “God Series”, and then it all made much more sense. Many important concepts and perspectives are developed and discussed in all the other books and so this is why it is important to have that grounding before finishing up with the “God Series”.
They have somewhere around 30-35 books (so far/Feb 2013) and it is some of the best critique of philosophy, science, psychology, etc., that exists in the world, at least that I have found and all in one place. They also have “coded fiction” works, which are the first four publications from Hockney, and which are very good, particularly:
The Armageddon Conspiracy
This book is similar to Dan Brown’s style (author of the “Da Vinci Code”), but is much more exciting. Their four fictional books are said to be based on aspects of their actual philosophy and secret knowledge of history and Gnosticism, and also on “current events”. The “Armageddon Conspiracy” book can be read first for an intro, but just keep in mind that it is a fiction with embellishments, and is a sort of “mythos” account of their otherwise rational philosophy.
They also have a website, http://www.armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/, which covers some of the same material as from the books, and also makes for good reading. But the entire set of books are where you get the total package and I personally recommend going to them for reading, although the website is a good supplement.
They write in their books that most people will not enjoy them, because they’re “too rational”, and they psychologically break down and prove exactly why this will be so. Not many authors can do that! Luckily for me I love that sort of thing…
Now, I would love to have discussion of these books and topics in the comments below, but this brings me to the “prerequisites” of such that will be accepted:
First, I will immediately trash, without attribution, any comments that try to make the argument that rationality and reason don’t exist. It is amazing how many people will try to come up with a rational argument to prove that rationality doesn’t exist. Do you have any idea how stupid and self-contradictory that is? Of course, if rationality doesn’t exist, there’s no point in someone trying to make that point, is there.
Second, I will immediately trash, without attribution, any comments that argue from the scientific materialist’s perspective that mind doesn’t exist. Do you understand how stupid it is to use your mind to argue that your mind doesn’t exist? Arguments like this typically come from academic scientists, proving that the vast majority of academics are so incredibly, not just philosophically uninformed, but uninformed even of science itself. Most academic scientists are rationally totally incompetent, with even many physicists believing that matter and materialism is “real” and that matter is made up of tiny little balls of “material stuff”. It is so incredibly uninformed. For example, ask a physicist, what caused the Big Bang? They will probably reply that it was the result of a “quantum fluctuation”. A fluctuation IN WHAT you morons? Before the universe existed there was nowhere to have a quantum fluctuation. Or, ask them, where are the laws of physics, how or where are they stored, and why does matter obey them? They’ll answer with “they just exist, it just happens”, which, of course, isn’t an answer at all. You will literally see physicists run away, red in the face, and angry, when you ask them about the actual really important questions that everyone imagines science might answer.
Science might answer these questions, but not without a shift in paradigm to “Philosophical Rationalism“, away from this contradictory literal belief in “material stuff” and external sense-based perception; quantum mechanics has already proved, long ago, that matter does not actually exist as any type of solid “material stuff”. The books from the Illuminati explain exactly what that shift will look like, and what the results will be. The first step of the process is, actually, in simply acknowledging mathematics; why is science successful only in so far as it is mathematical? Comprehend the profundity behind that and you are on your way to comprehending the nature and basis of reality. Do you really want to understand why reality exists and what created the Big Bang? You can, and you’ll be going far past the limited materialist paradigm in comprehending the rational answer (in fact, you’ll comprehend that you can go to the absolute limit beyond!).
Any comments which are trash-worthy may be kept for display of how incredibly stupid they are, and I may even take the time of verbally disabusing stupid comments of their stupidity simply for the rationalists to enjoy.
This is not to say that I expect anything anyone writes to be super-intelligent or impervious to error – it is just specifically that if you say things which debase the worth of your own mind, your own reason, and your own existence and that of others, then I will take the liberty of doing what you request. You argue that mind doesn’t exist? Fine, you’re a mindless idiot! You argue that rationality doesn’t exist? Fine, you don’t even have a hope of not being stupid! You argue that humanity isn’t worth anything or isn’t cosmically important? Fine, enjoy the gas chambers (so to speak)!
Please, argue with some damned worth behind yourself, would you? That’s the only thing I’m asking here: value yourself, your mind, your reason, and acknowledge that you and they exist, for goodness’ sake. If you can’t do that, why do you make the bother to not do it? Why hold the value in bothering to argue for your lack of value? It’s a sick self-debasement, a societal remnant of original sin, that you have no contract to inflict on others other than enjoying witnessing your destruction of the good.
The whole fraud of climate alarm is, of course, specifically based around vilifying human existence and instituting another form of “original sin”, and the moronically idiotic scientific materialist paradigm plays right into it. Scientific materialism is an actively intellectually offensive premise, and the whole faith in it. A rational person simply considering the premises of scientific materialism becomes actively intellectually annoyed.
The Idea
The basic premise is that reality is rational. If it wasn’t rational it wouldn’t exist, because it would be “all over the place”, or even non-existent. For reality to exist it has to be rational. This might called “the primary Rational Prerequisite for Existence”, or the first RPE.
Prerequisites for Existence:
- It is rational. If it wasn’t rational it could be anything at any time and would never have to be consistent, and it could even not exist, and this would be a contradiction. This relates to Leibniz’ most profound question: why is there something rather than nothing? Another way of stating this RPE is that “it exists”.
- It’s basis must be indivisible. If the basis of reality was divisible, then it wouldn’t be the basis of reality.
- This basis must be uncreated. If it was created, then it wasn’t the basis, because the thing which created it would have to be the basis and we would have to ask what its basis was.
These RPE’s can only be answered mathematically. Of course, the obvious corollary is that the mind is also rational. If you don’t acknowledge mathematics, you can not satisfy these RPE’s, and this is why people literally run from identifying what satisfies them, and is why they prefer to take the defeated position of denying that rationality or mind exists at all. Because they can’t figure out what must satisfy those RPE’s, and given that they’ve thought about it and couldn’t solve it, they conclude that their failure to answer them means that rationality doesn’t exist! Perfectly circular and egotistical logic. Sorry, it only means that you couldn’t solve it, not that rationality or mind doesn’t exist. At the very least, if this has been your defeated conclusion, then you should have no reason not to be perfectly happy at the prospect of discovering and comprehending the rational answers you were originally seeking!
Of course, for the traditionally religious, rationalism doesn’t matter or factor in because “God did it”, and, “please ignore number 3″, i.e. “there’s this thing we call God and it always existed and it did everything”. This does not explain what God is, and any lack of explanation is no good for a rationalist. It is also an answer which which is always based in emotionalism (security, fear, etc.), and comes attached with all manner of irrational emotional desires and satisfactions – it is all about mythos and mythos is always the entire point of this “answer”; it is always about feelings, not logos rationalism.
I’ll leave the answer to be discovered by the readers of the books, but perhaps in the future I’ll write out a short summary.
Phewww, I was somewhat concerned given your recent post re philosophy, good to see semantics being tackled too.
I absolutely agree that the three “Prerequisites for Existence” are the primary three questions. I also agree that mathematics is the best tool that humans are ever likely to develop to understand these three RPEs and is the only rational way of doing it as far as we humans are concerned.
I will be interested in reading further articles on this subject.
Hey, so far I read eight books of this alleged New Pythagorean Illuminati movement of the Gnostic orientation. Glad that someone else is interested to discuss these books. A few observations: Michael Faust, Mike Hockney, and Adam Weishaupt–all of these books are written by one author at most, the three authors (considering disciplines covered), but it is certainly one editor. I have analyzed various texts with a few experts in English and we all share the same view. Welcome to time of self-publishing
It is great–finally, the talented people who are well educated and who systematically worked on expanding their knowledge and developing critical reasoning skills can publish texts without any editorial pressures and express whatever they think. These books are great example of exercising free thinking that is equally challenging for the mainstream society, the Academia, religious consciousness, and rational Philosophy. Push the bubble, break the norm, find the readers, earn some money independently, imagine change–these are main motivations behind all of these books. Honestly, I doubt that there is any secret and organized movement of the Pythagorean Gnostics. At least not yet. Perhaps, those books represent an interesting start of the new movement. What amazes me are the connections made between the science, Philosophy, religion, spirituality, social, political, and economic systems. All of these connections are from time to time ingeniously put together, but I agree with you, sometimes they logically fall apart, though, many topics keep the reader’s attention well. Additionally, these books brought one more interesting point worth discussing–the author(s) from time to time express their critique and openly use swear words and these books are breaking the politically correct language code. I am sure, that there is no one reader who can accept all of the claims or ideas discussed in these books, but whoever has/have written these books is/are well read and he/they know(s) how to peak the interest of the spiritual seekers or those who are struggling with the critique of the tradition and contemporary global, greatly corrupted system. I agree with you on the logical problem relevant to rationality expressed in “The Idea,” but remember dialects; for purpose is to become a god according to these authors. One has to touch the abyss of the lurking inner nature and, at the same time overcome the “fall” by understanding one’s merit i.e. morality and cosmos (Abraxas). Yes, the ontological mathematics plus all spiritual renewal proposed in these books resembles to some sort of a new Metaphysics….. Not sure…. Thanks for the article.
Thanks for the commentary ivaray, excellent.
Hi Joseph,that’s an excellent synopsis of the full series and website. I’ve followed this person/group for the last couple of years, read the entire website, followed them on Facebook, I’ve read all of the God Series (currently on the latest release ‘The Noosphere’) and also taken many leads from them for further research. I could only describe it as the best University course money can’t buy:) There’s certain things explained throughout all this material which I have been able to instantly grasp from the outset but I get bogged down in much of the mathematical concepts etc (something I plan on working on).
Whether or not this group is ‘The Illuminati’ or not is still something I could not give a definitive yes or no answer too…at this point it really doesn’t matter as the material is so mind blowing, In defence of the claim this book backs up a lot of the claims through historical references and Pythagorean concepts which have seemingly been passed down through antiquity http://www.amazon.com/The-Music-Pythagoras-Brotherhood-Antiquity/dp/0802716318 I have more info for you if you are interested you can send me a quick email to ###
Hi Mike,
Glad you liked the synopsis. I’ll be writing another post soon on more in-depth detail about the nature of reality, and also another one on the Gnostic philosophy which lies behind the reason for calling the Higgs Boson the “the God Particle”, which is really fascinating.
Thanks for the book reference on Pythagoras and notification of the new book by Hockney – I hadn’t checked in a while. Will be getting into those tonight!
I removed your email address from the post so that spiders don’t pick it up; that’s a terrible email address by the way…lol…but I can’t say it doesn’t make me laugh thinking about the mind and motivation behind choosing it! A+ for boldness…I like that.
If you have questions on the mathematical concepts please feel free to ask or discuss them with me. I do have, relative to the general population, advanced training in mathematics and science and so it may be of use to you. I am hoping that people will post comments/questions on the comment board so that the discussions are available for other people seeking such things on-line.
As you know, they’ve stated that they hosted internet fora for discussion with the public in the past, but they were very disappointed with the results and with the things which most people wanted to discuss/accuse them of. “The Illuminati” is just such a toxic brand and I can understand why most people are so confused. It’s a jungle out in the world and there is an endless supply of BS. However, I’ve found that most people, even the conspiracy researchers etc., do appreciate the message of the Illuminati and agree with a lot of it. Of course, rationality and critical thinking isn’t really a part of the public education system, and hasn’t been for some time. They certainly understand that, but perhaps they haven’t experienced it directly. I myself had a degree of deprogramming to go through, and it wasn’t until I read the God Series and saw the actual mathematical discussion and a more complete presentation of the monadology that I finally took it all totally seriously. That worked for me because I have the mathematical training, but for most other people it won’t occur that way. Now, their stated goal was to find world-historic figures and so it wouldn’t much matter much what the rabble did or didn’t think about. However, revolution will occur once the 5-10% morphic resonance threshold is met in any case, and such a “soft” revolution may produce world historic figures anyway. In any case, I can handle people being “stupid” and being confused…I know what it is like.
It IS my desire to share this info and discuss it with “regular” people. I have found that most people like hearing about it. The only ones who still really get upset are the religious fundamentalists, but they’re hardly a factor today. Mainstream religion is dead for anyone under 40 years old in Western society, and the time may be ripe for a paradigm shift to generally-held belief patterns which are more self-affirming than exists now. Actually, the religious group I have found who do not have much of a problem at all with most of the tenets of Illuminism is the Mormons! I’ve talked to some very devout Mormons and when I tell them of Illuminist philosophy, they’re always like “oh yah we know that”. Of course, that is not in regards to anything mathematical, but generally to the idea of our souls becoming Gods etc. The main difference is they believe we only get one “material” incarnation, whereas Illuminism is fully reincarnational. But, it is incomparably healthier than standard Christianity and they don’t do the whole “original sin” bullshit gambit.
I just love sharing the ideas and concepts and seeing people comprehend them and understand them, and even agree with them. It is like a mental orgasm for me, or it is like the satisfaction you feel when you give someone else a physical orgasm, except you experience it in your mind too. Every time that I get to discuss the philosophy with someone new, and witness people comprehend it, my mind just swims, and I can do it over and over again and never get tired of it! I just love it – I love basking in its edifice, seeing someone else comprehend it, sensing the effect it is having in their mind, etc; it makes me feel warm, happy, and on the verge of explosion into Gnosis! It is just wonderful seeing someone comprehend their mind!
Perhaps some of us “regular people” who have become very familiar with the work can start an internet forum again, to help communicate the info, etc. Something to think about.
I’ll send you an email for the other info you offered.
Cheers!
JP
Thanks for removing the email address and it’s great to meet someone else who is fascinated with this treasure trove…there’s not many people out there it seems willing to put in the time and effort. I’m going to send you an email now with a few extra tidbits:)
Cheers Mike. It is just such great material, and you’re right that hardly anyone seems willing to read it…not even scientists. But for me, and for you too and “ivaray” below etc., I suspect it’s no effort at all but a joy. It’s joyful material, and there’s nothing like annihilating a new publication in 8 straight hours of reading (or more).
Hi Curious Ones,,
I regard the illuminati intellectual wing the most mind advanced people ever roamed the earth,,
I have one problem either with my logic which I regard in the same respect if not more in some tiny areas (no false modesty nor artificial pretension) or with theirs concerning 9-11 : from their point of view 19 stupid arabs broke the most sophisticated billions dollars defense system ( of the USA ) and did it,, from my point of view this is not what happened,, now either I’m stupid regarding this matter or they are the stupid ones or they have a political propaganda agenda to fill even if they know that what they’re stating and confirming TOO MANY TIMES that 19 stupid arabs did it,,
I leave you to your research and conclusions and judgement
happy illumination path to your omega’s
Hi Elie,
911 seems to grip the imagination, but there’s much more to the set of books and Illumination than that. People want a big explanation for 911 because it was a big event. Lyndon LaRouche at larouchepac.com has his explanation of how 911 occurred, and he seems to have the connections and knowledge to be believable. But the point is the same: this is what crazy religious people can be driven to! Good luck on your path
Hi Joseph,,
,, I know what you’re stating : I read their website nearly twice (all links) and I read some of their god series books and this is why I see them the MOST noble minded people,, you can call them highlanders, divine, angels, gods, or hyperboreans or whatever exotic word that sublimates their work,, concerning 9-11, you can give me many links to many websites as I can do it to myself or to you, that’s not essential,, the essence is to have an attitude and a stance towards this event/fact and to use reason/hyperreason/logic/hyperlogic/physics…. whatever you have to reach to the truth of what happened that day,, as a matter of fact I spent six years of my life with the belief that 19 extremist muslim arabs on the order of Osama Ben Laden exploded themselves in 4 airplanes by hitting wtc and the pentagon and whatever else… but then when I started my researches on the internet on tooooooooooo many subjects including the closest ones to the illuminati like philosophy/science/mathematics/ontology/religion/epystemology/consciousness/physics/…. you name it, I landed on their “chef d’oeuvre” http://www.armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/ and I was thrilled and excited and felt a shiver inside of me to meet people(at least in the mind) that are working on everything and I mean EVERYTHING because that was my path years before,, now if you go to their website, there’s a link “Conspiracy Theories explained” I ask you if such a subject is important or not to you ?! if it is important to you like it is to me, I wonder why they have links that span more than sixty pages on my big screen and this one has nearly superficial general three pages !? ,,
Thank you for replying
now I don’t want to speculate or judge intentions nor shortages, they are not a debating society as they told me once and they are radicals in the sense that they are trying to open humanity to a new horizon/paradigm/heaven…. but this silly subject ( 9-11 and the like ) by the eyes of many ( not mine ) coupled with their convictions and they MUST be logical ones is like you meet a god OK ?! he is God in many respects, and you stand in aw in front of him,, he’s brilliant, genius, rational, friendly when you’re not stupid, angry when you are,…. he’s perfect in every conceivable way you can imagine,, you spend hours and days with him,, you don’t get bored, you don’t stand still, you’re always moving forward with him,,,, but then he tells you that Jesus Christ is a chinese female !!! and he considers you and treat you as stupid if you don’t hold the same conviction ?1!!
again,,
excuse me for writing too much but this is how I feel towards these geniuses illuminati,,
,, plus this zero thing 
which is the center of their god series and it is the center of the existence is my conviction too but FAITHLY speaking 
,,
and by the way regarding their classification of people I should be a seventh or sixth degree illuminatus myself
anyway, I spent like three years reading about conspiracies and conpiracy theories and I can say that from what I have read pure reason and logic debunk the official story,, if all what I have read on the internet is but lies then I MUST say clearly that there is a bigger and larger conspiracy on its way,,
take care Joseph
Hi Elie,
If you haven’t yet, please put in the time to read all of their series of books. Read them all in order, chronologically, starting from the first date to the last. Spend every second of your spare waking time reading them. I can’t tell you what will happen to you, but I can tell you that something will. If you’ve already done that, keep letting it sink in. Save the God Series to read last.
Just consider this: there is nothing more rational than 1+1=2. Nothing could ever be more rational, or exceed the rationality of 1+1=2. Nothing else is more rationally true than this. Mathematics, number, therefore, is that than which nothing more rational can be conceived. Therefore, existence is either based on number and hence mathematics, or it is not rational. Reality must be rational or else it wouldn’t exist. Hence, existence is number/mathematics. As Pythagoras said “All things are number; numbers rule all.” It is too beautiful to not be true. Eventually you will come to understand the dialectical necessity of the number zero, and the implications of zero, and Euler’s Equation, etc.
And please, feel free to comment here whenever you wish.
Best regards to you too.
I will for sure
a promess to you and to myself 
they are the best,, my holy grail is to meet Mike Hockney 
in person,, though he can be many persons, I like to meet the one who wrote the armageddon conspiracy coded fiction,, any way forget about 9-11 if you think it’s not that important 
,, and see you soon 
on the noosphere 
REM : I am lucky because I can read up 24 hours a day 7 days a week,,
and in time I will write my own mind 
OK Elie! That’s a great goal. One of my goals from an early age was to be able to write poetry with one hand, and do mathematics with the other, at the same time.
I wouldn’t worry about meeting Hockney…what would it get you? I doubt he/she would care to meet anyone unless they had something truly new to tell them, such as exactly how to unite quantum mechanics with relativity theory via the Euler Equation, and things like that…ha. Be YOUR OWN hero. Seek to meet your self
I don’t work with”clichés”
Mr. Joseph,, have your own style not theirs 
and don’t worry about me nor my faith 
,, faith is in the monads 
as above so below 
,, “vu” that my mind evolution and dialectic reached some eight years ago the “zeraw” point 
I don’t much grails left to uncover and meet,, I’m interested to meet and to chat with the likes 
,, it’s that simple ,,
A+
Ahhh; very nice Elie, understood and appreciated!
Excellent 
Of course. Ever in Western Canada, let me know. I doubt I’ll ever be around where you are. And good luck…!
Watched “Cloud Atlas” on a flight the other day. Anyone else catch the “soul camera” references?
Hey, I felt like giving you a heads up (and any readers of this also) in case you have not already. You should join the following sites as these all have been enlightened by the AOI (Illumination and Meritocracy):
http://merit.clan.su/
https://www.facebook.com/illumination4earth
http://hex666.wordpress.com/
http://www.facebook.com/meritocracy4earth
We need to stick together. Hope I’ve helped!
Thanks Pegasus.
Hello,
I have been deeply intrigued and an avid reader of the material on the AC website as well as the God Series for the past year or so. I do not have advanced knowledge of mathematics, and I am looking for some assistance in grasping ideas. Glad to have found your site! Peace.
Hi ubster1,
If you want to discuss the material or have questions about it, I can try to help! Cheers.
Update post:
http://climateofsophistry.com/2013/03/27/pythagorean-illuminati-illuminism-the-ancient-order-of-the-illuminati-and-ontological-mathematics-update-march-27-2013/
I have been reading as many of the books put out by these folks as I can and have greatly enjoyed them. I just finished The Last Man To Know Everything. Wow. Some fascinating ideas. Really helping me get clearer on some things I have been trying to figure out about light, time, energy, etc.
I really appreciate your blog, keep up the good work!
Hi djevolved!
Well if you’ve happy with what you’ve read so far, keep going. Their latest releases, the God Series, are excellent. I’m getting finished an article on the nature of time and relativity etc. which will summarize some of those concepts, so check back for it. Also almost finished an article on how to make Meritocracy work, and what the potential dangers of it would be if not properly regulated.
Cheers.
hail all
it enlightens my soul, to see the good people blogging here.
the way of the ILLUMINATI is long. Eternal. Be all of you welcome to the journey onward to omega.
Adam W. Eishaupt
AOI
hex666.wordpress.com
Hi A.W.E.,
Here’s a graphic I was thinking of getting tattooed:
Also would like to combine it with a Phoenix Resurgam, holding cinnamon and myrrh in it claws, coming in for a landing to a large circumpunct with a trinary yin-yang symbol as the centre dot, the circle blending from black to rainbow around the circumference, with the rainbow radially shaded with red on the outside and violet on the inside. Black would start at the 6 o’clock position and circle around blending to rainbow counter clockwise, and then at the 10 o’clock position the rainbow would have a small blend-to-white “gap”, which itself blends to gold and then continues as gold back to the 6 o’clock position. Also have pictured a beautiful Goddess, Lucifer, handing a beast, Satan, an apple, with Satan cowering himself shielding his eyes from the light with one arm and looking away frantically, but with his other arm the beast is stretching out holding a Lotus flower for Lucifer. Lucifer and Satan are exchanging an apple for a lotus flower, respectively; in the background, a rising Sun.
Thought you might like the imagery.
I’ll be posting here in a while a paper on some more details of the implications for relativity theory and what the ontological mathematical derivation implies about it (space-time) and how it fixes the mistake, etc. Particularly interesting is how the arrow of time and the antisymmetry in the behaviour of space vs. time is defined by the fundamental properties of the fundamental equation itself. The paper adds some further insight that I hope is useful.
Best regards, the journey is here!