Chart of Politically Correct Beliefs

Nicely summarized:

Please also watch this associated video going into analysis of how they use this chart to target people:

Advertisements
Gallery | This entry was posted in Politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

32 Responses to Chart of Politically Correct Beliefs

  1. Let’s not forget Peter Ridd, who was fired by the cult leaders of James Cook University, and even after a court judge ruled in his favor against all fifteen counts (if I remember correctly) of misconduct, the James Cook University cult leaders still insisted on holding to their original position.

  2. And they will never admit when a particular flat line is a flat line indeed. They are ALL frauds protecting their racket. The entire system must be destroyed.

  3. The only flat line that I champion for greenhouse theory is its death.

  4. Well, it already shows one aspect of death, as it is:

  5. Gary Ashe says:

    They are racist graphs,

  6. Haha. Had to be said!

  7. If emission temperature can be considered to be in the same domain as near-surface air/water temperature, then the flat line of greenhouse theory can be considered to be in the same domain as the flat line indicating death. The logic works out perfectly. Flat Earth, flat line, death of scientific reasoning … see the parallelism?

    Now about environmental racism ………………………….. yes, it’s an actual concept. Alas, my hetero-normative, toxic-masculine disposition will not allow me to embrace it. And this is not a problem. I have great pride in my disposition. In fact, I am thinking about organizing a straight pride parade. And I am thinking organizing a meat-pride walk, to counter toxic vegetarianism — all participants will show their support by wearing a ribbon made of a bacon slice.

  8. CD Marshall says:

    If I may have a moment of your time, oh great ones, why are they saying an open atmosphere is an enclosed space? What is this utter nonsense and where did it originate from? Are they using this as a new justified mechanism for calling the greenhouse effect legitimate because the atmosphere is like a glass ceiling? If that is true then Joseph is on to something, not only do they believe in flat earth physics flat Earhters also believe the atmosphere is an enclosed space. Yes they claim over the atmosphere is a clear plasma bubble that is impenetrable and on the outskirts of the Earth is an ice wall also impenetrable. I think flat Earthers and ghe should unite.

    The Flat Earth Greenhouse Effect.

  9. Who is saying that, and how etc? More info/quote.

  10. CD Marshall says:

    RK
    You can have floats that BBQ meat. You know I heard in California they had to close down a steak house because someone claimed they could smell the meat in their neighborhood and they were a vegan, so it offended them.

  11. CD Marshall says:

    Joseph,

    I keep hearing from some climate alarmists. I don’t know what they are talking about. I’ve looked into it and I can’t find anything. Next one who says it I’ll ask I guess. The only thing I found was referring to enclosed atmospheres (areas) of a confined space and using common sense about gas build up. I have no idea how they are connecting the two.

  12. Likely lying and sophizing as usual.

  13. Thanks for that Robert may do a video discussion of the original and your updated one.

  14. Now humans understand the Arrow of Energy – “Energy, like time, flows from past to future”, the time has come to rewrite the Magna Carta from scratch, leaving a space in it for Energy and the Laws of Physics!

    https://the-fifth-law.com/pages/press-release?climateofsophistry=magnacarta2

  15. squid2112 says:

    “Western Democracies” … The United States of America is not a “Democracy” .. in fact, we are the only Constitutional Representative Republic on Earth. Other “western” countries are failing because many of them actually are “Democracies”. There purpose of America’s form of government is to ensure a voice for the minority (Representative Republic) protected by a Constitution.

    “Democracies” bread tyrants .. as has been consistently shown throughout history. In a “Democracy”, the majority can remove the rights of the minority .. and eventually they always do. A real “Democracy” is as bad as Communism or any other form of Socialism or Dictatorship .. A “Democracy” most assuredly becomes just as tyrannical as any of these other forms of government.

    There are very important reasons why America is a Constitutionally protected Representative Republic … not a “Democracy” … there is virtually nothing “Democratic” about our form of government, despite how many times you are told so.

  16. CD Marshall says:

    In a simpler form I was always told in a Democracy majority rules the US Constitution was designed to protect Americans from a “mob rule”. That’s why the “Left” always “act” like they are a majority and everyone else should just shut up and accept it. Every time Democrats lose an election they use the majority card like they use the racist/bigot/homophobia/Climate Denier…and everything else that can make up. Ironically, in the U.S. the democratic party were the majority slave owners, fought against former slaves having rights, women being allowed to vote, and had prominent members in the KKK. They are anti-Semites, protect Muslim extreme ideology and are compliant to communism/socialism/Tyranny.

    I mean look at them, they have been actively trying to remove a legitimate elected president for almost 4 years and using every criminally compliant means to do it all the while with 8 years of Obama we were told to shut up and take it he won and is president. Hypocrites on and all.

  17. CD Marshall says:

    Hypocrites one and all.

  18. CD Marshall says:

    Interesting video suggested to me, fits quite well on this subject a matter.

  19. Joseph E Postma says:

    That’s a good vid.

    The entire thing is bullshit, designed to enslave, impoverish, and TRULY to ultimately destroy the human soul, spirit, and civilization.

  20. CDM, thanks much for your comments and that video clip. Totally spot on IMHO. To our detriment we, skeptics in general, do not have anywhere near the financial capacity of the billionaires who have conveniently signed their name to this environmental agenda. Thanks also due to JP for having this site and allowing links in the comments section. JP, you are a TRUE CHAMPION!

  21. The editors of NATURE Communications, a prestigious professional “scientific” [clear throat] publication, seem to have gotten themselves into some deep shit with the following article:

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-09959-4

    .. glorified witch hunting and censorship at its finest [in the name of … “science”, clear throat again] causing quite a stir.

  22. The kicker line in the NATURE-article abstract reads as follows:

    These results demonstrate why climate scientists should increasingly exert their authority in scientific and public discourse, and why professional journalists and editors should adjust the disproportionate attention given to contrarians.

    Exert authority and adjust attention. Very scientific, right?

    Hopefully, the NATURE paper stays online long enough for enough people to examine how utterly stupid it is on so many levels.

    Indoctrinate children, hunt down the witches and censor them. Nah, no political agenda there.

  23. What disgusting little weasels. I have come to loathe scientists.

  24. How is it…that on this planet there is billions of dollars of infrastructure and billions of dollars of salaries to make sure the line is towed for lies to be spread…but all someone has to point out flat earth theory exists and is wrong is a $26 blog, and when he tries to use that billion dollar infrastructure to point it out, they ask him for empirical evidence that flat earth is wrong?

    Where are the gods? Where are the aliens? Where is any inkling of a force of truth to destroy it all and burn it all down!? Why is it that the only thing which can exist is retardation?

  25. CD Marshall says:

    Joseph,
    In my younger days I worked as a Houseman for the Sheraton Suites. All day everyday for the 10% wealthiest people who stayed there the Houseman had to cater to them like babysitters. We always ask why do we have to do this, why are we wasting time doing it this way, why are we spending so much time doing what they can do just as easily?

    Our Boss would always say.”Look, as a general rule always always always assume the general population is stupid and we are looking out for them.”

    So it got to the point when a new worker would say,”Why are we doing this again?”
    We’d all reply, “Because people are stupid.”

    Our jobs wasn’t just catering to their needs but protecting them from themselves by anticipating what they were going to do and us preventing an undesired outcome. We always had to be 10 steps ahead of them.

    Why?

    Because as a general rule, “People are stupid.”

  26. We must live in hell. This must be where hell is. Right here. Hell is here. This place is hell.

  27. Hans Schreuder says:

    Quite right Joe and CDM as well! There is no heaven and hell is indeed right here where most of us scrape an existence unless you were born with a golden spoon up your rear end and have money to burn on making yourself comfy and play stupid games. Stupidity has always reigned supreme and the expression that BS baffles brain is true.

  28. Hans Schreuder says:

    This is how dumb the general public is and they do not wish to be educated; to follow is so much easier:

  29. CD Marshall says:

    Another interesting video:

  30. Zoe Phin says:

    Hans,
    They are convinced that CO2’s ability to absorb 8% of outgoing radiation is more important than its actual contribution to average kinetic energy, i.e. temperature. 8% is a BIG number. 8%!

  31. CD Marshall says:

    Zoe,
    Hmm, where are these charts showing the outgoing IR and er walk me through it again. I think I got confused somewhere. More IR is going out, not less, right? Which means CO2 is not “trapping” as they claim. So far so good (I hope). Irregardless of solar irradiance IR is measured from surface radiation. So, I’m assuming with albedo and whatever you can calculate the average surface upwelling IR.

    So, is this IR in accordance with the proper math or not? Is it higher or lower? Now if it is higher, what counts for it? Geothermal?

    If Geothermal is increasing, and volcanic activity and Earthquakes have been, that’s a clear sign geothermal is acting up. Yellowstone is increasing in Magma under it’s surface. Can geothermal increase be enough to warm oceans up and throw them out of their natural osculation cycles?

    That’s the thing I don’t get. You’d think using geothermal energy would be a big win all around. Keep that cap from popping off by constantly releasing it’s pressure and taking advantage the energy in the process.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s