## Ontological Mathematics & the Theory of Everything Part 1: Why Does Something Exist Rather Than Nothing?

In this video I answer the question as to why something, anything at all, exists rather than nothing? The Idealist philosophy of Ontological Mathematics by Mike Hockney has now answered this question! How do we arrive at a self-explanatory understanding of existence where we can stop the infinite regress of appealing to something else outside of existence to create what we know as existence? The answer to existence must be self-contained and appeal to nothing outside of itself.

This entry was posted in Illuminism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

### 108 Responses to Ontological Mathematics & the Theory of Everything Part 1: Why Does Something Exist Rather Than Nothing?

1. Brilliant as usual. Looking forward to this series.

2. Joseph E Postma says:

Created an Ontological Mathematics YT channel:

3. Zelator says:

Well explained that Joe! Well done; very enjoyable, and very well articulated.
Really looking forward to this lecture series.

4. Zelator says:

Boomie, this may explain your question on Youtube. You are assuming Big bang was the beginning of existence. It wasnt, it was an event that will eventually cease to be.
But true existence has always existed as nothing ( as potential) as potential for another big bang, or multiple big bangs or events etc coming into the space time 3d existence as an event. That is all it is, it is a potential materialising as an event as motion extending from nothing.
What causes extension = Mind. Intention of mind.

5. Zelator says:

So the ether i.e (the field) is really 2 x 3d cartesian grids, one of real numbers/axis and one of imaginary numbers/axis (space/time) netting to zero. ( i.e 6d).

Or in other words a Cartesian-Gaussian 6D co-ordinate grid. On Earth it’s a crystalline 6d grid.

6. boomie789 says:

What if there wasn’t a big bang at all? No expansion?

7. Zelator says:

Exactly, no expansion.

8. Zelator says:

Just potential. Pure balance.

9. Zelator says:

The Void

10. Zelator says:

Unexpressed potential.

11. Zelator says:

Unexpressed (Un-extentended) neutrally balanced potential.

12. Zelator says:

So the question is what moves potential? = intention.

13. Zelator says:

What is intention? = Mind

14. Zelator says:

There is an mathematical equation for mind. Joe will no doubt explain the ontological reasoning behind mind = 0
Hope I helped.

15. Zelator says:

A good book for non materialists interested in the mind is a book by Dawson Church called “Mind to Matter”. The title says it all.

16. J Cuttance says:

Valuable valuable stuff, thanks Joe.

17. God is the word and the word is God. What is God? “the truth, the way and the life”. Also “I am the alpha and the omega”. Everything and nothing.

I look forward to the rest of this series

18. boomie789 says:

19. Zelator says:

Oasis – I’m Outta Time:

Interesting home page of the AC Joe, have you seen it recently, since the death of Foo fighters Drummer Taylor Hawkins?
It has an out of time clock. A cover song by the Dead Kennedys, featuring Taylor Hawkins on drums.

http://www.armageddonconspiracy.co.uk

Could this refer to time out for the drummer as he sold his sold to the devil, and its payback time?

Remember David Bowie’s final song before he died. Black star. At the day of Execution:

In the villa of Ormen, in the villa of Ormen
Stands a solitary candle, ah-ah, ah-ah
In the centre of it all, in the centre of it all
On the day of execution, on the day of execution
Only women kneel and smile, ah-ah, ah-ah
At the centre of it all, at the centre of it all

Ah-ah-ah
Ah-ah-ah
In the villa of Ormen, in the villa of Ormen
Stands a solitary candle, ah-ah, ah-ah
At the centre of it all, at the centre of it all
Ah-ah-ah

Something happened on the day he died
Spirit rose a metre and stepped aside
Somebody else took his place, and bravely cried
(I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar)
How many times does an angel fall?
How many people lie instead of talking tall?
He trod on sacred ground, he cried loud into the crowd
(I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar, I’m not a gangstar)

I can’t answer why (I’m a blackstar)
Just go with me (I’m not a filmstar)
I’ma take you home (I’m a blackstar)
Take your passport and shoes (I’m not a popstar)
And your sedatives, boo (I’m a blackstar)
You’re a flash in the pan (I’m not a marvel star)
I’m the Great I Am (I’m a blackstar)

I’m a blackstar, way up, on money, I’ve got game
I see right, so wide, so open-hearted pain
I want eagles in my daydreams, diamonds in my eyes
(I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar)

Something happened on the day he died
Spirit rose a metre then stepped aside
Somebody else took his place, and bravely cried
(I’m a blackstar, I’m a star’s star, I’m a blackstar)
I can’t answer why (I’m not a gangstar)
But I can tell you how (I’m not a flam star)
We were born upside-down (I’m a star’s star)
Born the wrong way ’round (I’m not a white star)
I’m a blackstar, I’m not a gangstar
I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar
I’m not a pornstar, I’m not a wandering star
I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar

When you sell your soul to the devil for fame or fortune, he will come for payback. No
amount of selling your soul is worth it.

20. Zelator says:

Notice that Bowie says we are born upside down. ( literally and metaphorically)

Turning the key!

Now Jonathan Kleck also mentions upside down too.

He says: Unless your turned upside down,( reborn) you are not saved. (i.e turned right side up).

2mins 7 seconds ….. if you dont want to watch it all.

21. Zelator says:

If you are interested in any more, then here is a link with greater detail:
Be aware discernment is a skill, its not pareidolia, it is however using meaning and intention behind artistry, emblems, grimoires, psycho-pictography, mandalas and all sorts of visual imagagery that is available to those able to see or want to see; i.e those psychic, those who use religion and ritual and semantics, parables and simile/metaphor amongst our own psychiatric personalties using the likes of NLP/ Hypnosis/Meditation and Chakra balance authorities and Enneagram and the like of Myers Briggs systems. Jungian and Freudian proclivities. Astral and OBE amongst several other avenues of attaining information, which there are many many more.

In other words dont judge someone unless you have taken the time to find out otherwise.

22. Zelator says:

Boomie can you post that gif/jpg image you did again of the two factions, i.e the Aldous Huxley Brave New World versus the George Orwell 1984 comparisons? Thanks

23. That’s weird about the AC site, Z. How long has it been like that? When was t-0?

24. Zelator says:

I only noticed it yesterday Joe. I check it infrequently to see for updates about new book releases. So it must have been in the last couple of weeks or so. I also check their facebook page under different identities the last being the Locust Party and they seem to have closed that as well. Their Facebook page has never really taken off. It has weird themes and weird followers lol.

25. Zelator says:

Do you ever hear from any of the illuminati.pub guys? Seems they got a gag order or something, they seem to have disappeared off the face of the earth. Even their websites and stuff are just of trees and mountains.

26. Joseph E Postma says:

You mean the old FB group, The Illuminati Pub?

Never knew of a website.

27. Zelator says:

Yeh that’s them. I was thinking of a sub group.

28. boomie789 says:

29. Zelator says:

Thanks Boomie, yes it seems they are getting close to some sort of currency reset.

From what I have gathered, there are two competing “resets”.

The Great Reset was the Communist Cabal China Model, were we would be given a digital currency basic income. And be paid to do certain tasks. It could also be switched off if you were bad, so you could not buy food, heat etc.

This was the Klaus Schwabb/Rothschilds system. You will own nothing and be happy.

The second was a “new use” quantum system ( using the old Metatron AI) supposedly by the White Hats, run by the likes of Trump, Flynn etc. GESARA, and would run not only the monetary system, but the voting system, government etc. This quantum system would have access to “everything” everywhere including in your home, your shopping etc.

This is the one Charlie Ward, Simon Parkes etc are backing.

Like you I dont trust either system, as I think it may lead to more control and lack of freedoms.

Their is a 3rd one that Ben fulford and Kim Goguen are backing, which is a new trinary QFS which has non of the freedom restrictions, but is being blocked by the two other main players above.

Of the two main players, one wants a New World Order, and the other wants a One World Order. There is a subtle difference.

Underlying both systems is a eugenics population control plan.

Below is info sourced from :

Click to access Restored-Republic-via-a-GCR-4-1-2022.pdf

At the moment the Deep State and Cabal are pumping out their Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).
They are trying to make it look like it’s their system. The simple difference between the CBDC and the Quantum Financial System is that one is gold-backed and one is not

They have been trying to get the QFS system to interact with the Legacy Banking System. They had a tough time with the old technology, but last night it worked for the first time. There were successful huge transfers beginning last night.

Fri. 1 April was the beginning of the new Quantum Financial System (QFS) using the new digital currency of Blockchain, while trading currencies of all nations would be gold/asset-backed trading at a 1:1 with each other.

Last Year Juan O Savin said that Donald Trump would be recognized as the US President by April Fool’s Day Fri. 1 April.

At 12:01 am 1 April was reported by Bruce to be the start of GESARA/ NESARA, plus the USN, USTN and Restored Republic would be in effect.

The Emergency Broadcast System could begin Sat. evening or Sunday 2,3 April.

Tax refunds, loan interest, Mortgage interest, etc. might be paid back to us starting in April 4-6, with final pay out over the next year.
The US National Emergency would end Sun. 10 April.

The fiat US dollar (US Inc. was bankrupted by the Chinese Communist Party and Saudi Arabia according to Charlie Ward) would be phased out (traded at a 1:1 to the new gold-backed US Treasury Note) by the end of the US Treasury fiscal year in Sept. 2022.

As of midnight EST Thurs. 31 March 2022, the US Inc. fiat dollar, Cabal-owned Federal Reserve and IRS would be dead.
By Fri. 1 April the Global Currency Reset of 209 nations to gold/asset-backed digital currencies trading at a 1:1 with each other would be complete, as would the restoration to principles of the original US Constitution.

Meanwhile on Fri. 1 April, the Cabal was attempting to launch it’s own digital currency that had no backing, although a three trillion debt problem emerged as the Fed prepared to enforce that Rothchild Central Bank Digital Currency.

The Cabal-run White House has announced that it was launching the Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), while the US Mint was out of Silver planchets – the stuff they used to stamp out silver coins.

A 3 Trillion problem emerges as the Fed prepares to launch the Rothchild’s Central Bank Digital Currency:

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/sounding-alarm-3-trillion-problem-emerges-fed-prepares-launch-qt

30. Zelator says:

I like this interview, in it David Icke talks about his latest book “Perceptions of a Renegade Mind”.

He explains how reality exists and how the shadows in Plato’s Cave are perceived as reality, just like Joe said.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/0DSs6D6zmNAj/

I just bought the book and I’m starting to read it today.

This interview follows on from a previous video he did about a year ago, where he talked about the “simulation we live in” and can be found here:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uDtIHeptxbz6/

31. boomie789 says:

https://odysee.com/@redicetv:1/is-russia-anti-globalist-whats-putins-objective:5

https://redice.tv/red-ice-tv/is-russia-anti-globalist-whats-putins-objective

“Apollonian Germ joins us to discuss what the motivations of Putin and Russia really is. Are they operating independently against the “Liberal World Order” or are they simply one head of the double headed eagle of control that is is driving our civilization towards the end? Is Putin working on his own behalf or is he influenced by other interests? In the second part we discuss the influence of UNESCO in the Russian educational system and how the World Economic Forum – at least up until very recently – had major influence in the country. Later we hear about how powerful Chabad is in Russia and about Putin’s personal relationship to Judaism.”

32. Zelator says:

Ok Boomie, this is just for you. I haven’t watched your videos yet, but I will, but I think I know what you are getting at.

The “Putin Avatar” is in the Trump camp. You have to realise he is not the same Putin from the Communism days.

You know, I was trying to avoid answering this as like I said last time to a question of yours it goes very deep.
But you are very persistent and I will give you that. You obviously see the contradictory nature of what we see on the surface. There is a cross over as they have similar agendas but they are not on the same side.

There are two main factions. That is true. Both are Luciferian. That is true.
One is Satanic. Both are Fallen Angelics, some would call them aliens.

On the one hand you have the NWO Sons of Belial or Annunaki.
These are beings that have lost their connection to god source and are utilizing human
and other beings as their food source to live thousands of years.

The other clan is the Black Sun. One World Order (not OLD world order as portrayed) or otherwise known as the Zeta Drakonian Archon.

Now you can try and fit the Khazarians, the bloodlines, the Royals, the Nazis etc into a category but it is difficult as it overlaps.

Just know they have a similar negative agenda.

I would say to put it simply, it is the Khazarian mafia who is in charge at the moment (Cabal NWO), and the Black Sun worshipping illuminati who Trump and Putin are involved in who are opposing them. Hence talk of Trump and Putin smashing the NWO. The balance of power has been shifting
for thousands of years since Atlantis up till the American and European Revolutions.
It was at Lemuria that the two factions first faced off, and caused the destruction of Atlantis by the aggressive Aryan Atlantians.

33. CD Marshall says:

Proof insanity is actually saner than what the “sane” is trying to prove is insanity.

34. CD Marshall says:

PS
Elon is seriously considering either buying Twitter or creating his own social media for the distinct purpose of allowing real free speech. I’m hoping he has a way to kill the bots. He said it himself he disagrees with many things but feels they have the right to express their side of the opinion.

35. boomie789 says:

Torba with gab.com is pretty great imo. Don’t know how he could do better than that.

36. Zelator says:

Lol good post CD. There really is a conspiracy to keep the true conspiracy buried in making the masses believe that thinking for themselves is a conspiracy. Bahh Baaah

37. CD Marshall says:

boomie789
I do find Twitter hard to navigate but that’s because everything is suppressed, they don’t want shared.

38. CD Marshall says:

39. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

Energy (units: J) is defined as the capacity to do work (units: J). Work is defined as the application of a force through a distance.

It is a fundamental physical property… you’ll note that energy must always be ‘carried’ by something, it cannot exist on its own.

That’s why photons are considered the force-carrying gauge bosons of the EM interaction, virtual photons the force-carrying gauge bosons which mediate magnetism, and invariant-mass matter (and energy) the cause of gravitational potential.

So energy is defined as the capacity to apply a force through a distance (and only the capacity… remember, potential energy can exist without movement).

That implies a potential, specifically a potential gradient. There can exist negative and positive potential, and it is posited that the universe actually has net zero energy… the positive potential of, for instance, photons and virtual photons, etc., balanced by the negative potential of, for instance, gravitating mass, etc.

ASIDE:
{ Of course, E^2 = m^2 c^4 + p^2 c^2 and 1LoT.

E = m c^2

E = 1 kg (299792458 m sec-1)^2 = 89875517873681764 kg m^2 sec-2 = 89875517873681764 J = 24965421632 kWh

That’s eighty nine quadrillion, eight hundred seventy five trillion, five hundred seventeen billion, eight hundred seventy-three million, six hundred eighty one thousand, seven hundred sixty four Joules.

That’s twenty four billion, nine hundred sixty five million, four hundred twenty one thousand, six hundred thirty-two kWh.

In a single kilogram of invariant-mass matter.

Taking osmium as the most-dense element at 22.59 g cm-3 (empirically measured via x-ray crystallography), that’s an equivalent energy density of 2030287948766471048760 J m-3.

“But you said energy always flows from higher to lower energy density!”, you may state…

No, I said energy can only flow from higher to lower energy density (and not the other way around without external energy doing work upon the system to move that system energy up the energy gradient)… and only if it is allowed to… that energy in invariant-mass matter is locked up via the strong interaction (for the nucleus) and Lorentz force (for the bound electrons). Block the quantum vacuum, and the strong force diminishes, the Lorentz force pulls the bound electrons into the nucleus, and the element electron capture decays its way up the Periodic Table until it hits hydrogen, whereupon it unwinds into electrons, electron anti-neutrinos and gamma rays. And that is the technology we need to power the world and propel us to a higher spot on the Karashev Scale. }

Or in common parlance, mass and energy are two forms of the same thing, and it is conserved. That thing being energy.

So the universe may be nothing more than a bifurcation into positive and negative potentials, its continued existence only because the expansion moved those differing potentials away from each other so they didn’t immediately annihilate.

40. Zelator says:

Boomie, I disagree with the conclusions drawn in the first vid. Didn’t watch the second one as I imagine it was the same diatribe as the first, unless you want to enlighten me. Yes they were the original plans, but that is outdated.
They are not wrong but outdated conclusions for the 20th century. Things have moved on. Everyone is reading the same conspiracy books from the 20th century, and in the meantime something massive happened.

He says there is one faction playing both sides. Who benefits etc. The Albert Pike scenario of 3 world wars.

Wrong. That was a plan, but like all best laid plans of mice and men, plans go awry.

That plan would have had us enslavened by now if it had GONE TO PLAN. BUT it didn’t!

Now there are TWO sides vying for power. Everything changed in 2008. Before that, yes the Elites held the balance of Power.

At the height of their hedgemony yes the Rothschilds ( holders of Solomons ring) funded both sides of the wars, but within this hedgemony were two competing factions/working together who have now broken off. (Well were never really together just joined by Covenant).

Let’s just say they shared the spoils of war. There was a Covenant by King Solomon ( 2000 year Seal with the Archons) that expired in 2008.

This allowded the one side that was being held in play (The Archons) to now be free to go for power on its own terms. Hence this new power play.

This is what we saw on the surface as the banking crisis of 2008. This allowed the likes of Trump to eventually be allowed to run for POTUS.
Do you think is was coincidence the Illuminati came online with their Armageddon Conspiracy Website around 2008?

Time to rewrite the conspiracy books.

41. Zelator says:

David Bowie – Lazarus :

42. Zelator says:

I used to live in the town where David Bowie was born. He had a studio in a place called Beckenham, Kent England. It was converted to a Pub called the 3 Tuns. Used to go there alot. Last I heard it was called the Rat & Parrot.

43. Richard says:

Joe,
You mention on 14:30 in your video that there are types of nothing, where do these types come from? Zero is not a number so no division is possible. All of this reminds me of the vacuum as used in mathematical physics. A vacuum is nothing but all kinds of stuff are supposedly coming out of this nothingness because they are needed for the made-up equations to make sense.

44. CD Marshall says:

Human rights are ether taken by force or surrendered. Convince most of the population to surrender and they become the force needed to do your work for you. We’ve already seen this is so easy to do on a mass scale.

Halt food on shelves.
“The unvaccinated are doing this. Let’s get them.”
Prevent travel.
“The unvaccinated are doing this. Let’s get them.”
Ga prices rise.
“Fossil fuels are evil” Tesla stock goes up.

Create a crisis, show your answer to the fictional crisis, rinse and repeat.

True capitalism to
Crony Capitalism to
Socialism to
Communism to
Totalitarian global Government.
Humans are segregated according to class and function.
Common person becomes worker 2541
The Elite become gods with a Utopia.

45. boomie789 says:

46. boomie789 says:

I can attest to huge morality lessons being reversed from older Trek to new. Writing in Hollywood is extremely dumb today.

They write everything dark, depraved and dumb.

And I’m pretty sure the writers haven’t even watched the television show lol. I think they just watched the TNG movies.

47. So gross.

48. boomie789 says:

49. Existence for Whites…

50. Joseph E Postma says:

From one of the retarded journals that can’t vet round-Earth theory:

THE ROYAL SOCIETY

Dear colleague

Thank you to everyone who has completed the diversity monitoring survey so far. If you haven’t had a chance to do so yet, I would be grateful if you could take a few minutes to complete the short, four-question diversity monitoring survey.

The Royal Society is committed to promoting diversity in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) by seeking to increase participation from under-represented groups.

As part of the ongoing diversity programme agreed by the Council of the Royal Society, greater consideration is being given to data gathered and analysed at the Society in relation to its own activities.

The Society monitors the diversity of its Fellowship, Committees, Research Fellows, sub-groups and Boards for the Society’s annual diversity data report. The Society is also inviting those who have contributed to its journals or participated in Royal Society activities in 2021 to complete this survey. With your help, we will be able to provide a comprehensive and accurate diversity report, and identify areas of under-representation.

The survey should take no more than 2 minutes to complete. You can select ‘prefer not to say’ for any of the questions.

The information provided will form a confidential statistical record in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation and will not be used for any purpose other than analysis of the Society’s activities. We use aggregated data from respondents to produce the annual diversity report, and your answers are never used to identify you personally. View examples of previous diversity data reports.

We would be grateful if you could complete the survey by Thursday 7 April 2022.

Go fill it out if you all want.

51. CD Marshall says:

boomie789
I tolerated the 1st season of Picard the 2nd season did me in. So much virtue signaling for the “MESSAGE” It gave me vertigo.

The NG was it, after that, things went downhill. DSN wasn’t bad but nobody watches Trek for space stations, we want ships. A captain of a space station AT DS9 would have been more entertaining. Although the characters did have depth not like Discovery which makes me want to vomit.

52. Joseph E Postma says:

From Rebel News:

“Canada is no stranger to critical race theory (CRT).
Ontario is even planning on legislating it to be taught in schools by trying to pass Bill 67, the Racial Equity in the Education System Act, which aims to inject critical race theory into every facet of Ontario’s education system.
More and more, we hear of these fringe ideologies making their way into our publicly-funded institutions without pause, and anyone who dares to question them is guilted, shamed, or even punished for doing so.
Chanel Pfahl, a 29-year-old high school teacher, is one of those dissenting voices.
In February 2021, she commented on a private teachers’ Facebook group in response to another post asking for resources on developing a curriculum around the Black Lives Matter movement.
Chanel’s comments, which suggested that all teachers should model kindness and inclusion regardless of race, led to her college launching an investigation which resulted in a one-week suspension without pay.
But the complainant was not satisfied with that and has now escalated their grievance. Once again, Chanel is being investigated by the college, and her teaching licence is now under review.”

LOL: “Developing a curriculum around the Black Lives Matter movement.”

Gross. This will not end well for Whites, or anyone else…

And these people…with their stupid committees and grievances…they have total control now, can stop your pay on a whim.

53. Everything they’re doing in Star Trek now with retarded wokism was built in to TNG though. They’re simply demonstrating where it all leads to now.

In TNG there was an episode where Geordi the poc cripple had to save a race of eugenics-breds who of course all happened to be White.

The message always being that cripples and degenerates and fats and flat heads and uglies are always way, way more intelligent and useful and better at everything than attractive high-breeds with excellent pedigree. Dysgenic brainwashing in other words…conditioning people to virtue signal their disability as a value in and of itself as if it’s better to be a cripple in some form or another. Hence…teenagers going trans etc.

We’re being destroyed.

54. boomie789 says:

55. boomie789 says:

I like Quark, Odo and Garak from DS9. Sisko is kind of cringe sometimes. Not a great actor imo. The weird religious stuff ruins the show and especially the ending. The dominion war was ok though.

Postma was right though it was just 1st wave progressivism and now we are on 3rd wave or more.

56. CD Marshall says:

Well the intent of Rodenberry was for Star Fleet to have no racial, religious or petty emotional conflicts at all. They were the best of the best, and behaved accordingly. You didn’t see that kind of behavior in the original series, no one questioned the captain in front of the Bridge and if they did they’d be tossed in the Brig or temporarily relieved of command.

The only restrictions to the original series was the prejudices of the 70s when the show came out. However some things Rodenberry wanted was a little out there.

I don’t recall which show it was, may have been NG but a dickhead producer who didn’t like the show as it was intended rewrote scripts secretly at night w/o anyone knowing it, that may be where a lot of the “message” episodes came from. I think he was eventually discovered and fired.

57. CD Marshall says:

Elon is the new board member of Twitter.

58. CD Marshall says:

Joe you got trash talkers over at Twitter again, I know at this point it seems a waste of time defending yourself against the same ole crap and spineless weasels.

59. CD Marshall says:

Joe,
If you got time, I think it’s fair to defend the Oregon Petition,
My apologies if this turns out wrong.

That was an open petition and there signatures from such scientists as Mickey Mouse.I showed you a statement by various scientific organizations who only a tin hat wearing conspiracy theorist would call political.— Alan123 (@ALefty123) April 4, 2022

60. CD Marshall says:

If you click the date, it hyperlinks you to the conversation.

61. boomie789 says:

62. CD Marshall says:

Joe you should contact Cook and ask for a live debate. Love to see the excuses.
https://ise.gmu.edu/faculty-directory/john-cook/

63. Joseph E Postma says:

Look at what that fn retard Cook is paid to do:

■ CARDS (Computer Assisted Recognition of Denial & Skepticism): Using machine learning to detect and categorize climate misinformation, to develop the “holy grail of fact-checking” (automatic detection & refutation of online misinformation)

■ TMEO (Turning Misinformation into an Educational Opportunity): Drawing on my research into misconception-based learning and critical thinking, I developed climate curriculum being implemented and tested in high schools nationally

■ Skeptical Science Experiment: The Skeptical Science website receives 3.7 million visitors per year, mostly from Google searches about climate misinformation. We will collect pre and post-test survey data from visitors, identifying the characteristics of effective debunkings

■ Mobile Serious Game: Developing a mobile game that uses interactive exercises and cartoons to engage students and the general public with the goal of raising critical thinking skills about climate change

Sounds so intelligent! All of course with the intent of reinforcing cognitive dissonance as the sensation of engaging in reason. Highly intelligent parasitism and their schemes…

64. Joseph E Postma says:

Sent him a link to my book.

65. CD Marshall says:
66. Holy f that’s full of mental retardation.

67. CD Marshall says:

It’s like the NAZI indoctrination camps for kids.

68. CD Marshall says:

69. CD Marshall says:

Good video

70. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

Joseph E Postma wrote:
“The message always being that cripples and degenerates and fats and flat heads and uglies are always way, way more intelligent and useful and better at everything than attractive high-breeds with excellent pedigree. Dysgenic brainwashing in other words…conditioning people to virtue signal their disability as a value in and of itself as if it’s better to be a cripple in some form or another. Hence…teenagers going trans etc.

We’re being destroyed.”

And to think Ayn Rand foresaw this exact scenario 65 years ago… the ‘politics of pull’ being the crony capitalism inherent in the Biden Crime Family, the dysgenic brainwashing elucidated via the leftards in her story always somehow leaning toward favoring the weak, stupid, lowest-of-the-low… how a person lives like that is beyond me. Why a person would want to live like that is beyond me.

I chalk it up to the fact that liberalism / progressivism / socialism / communism / whatever new ‘ism’ they’re using to cover their tracks is a mental illness.

The question is: What do we do to bring life back to some semblance of normality? They won’t stop until they’ve destroyed everything, so destroying them seems increasingly to be the only solution.

71. boomie789 says:

72. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

Continuing on from my previous post:

The Klechkowski Rule for electron filling of orbital shells:
1s -> 2s -> 2p -> 3s -> 3p -> 4s -> 3d -> 4p -> 5s -> 4d -> 5p -> 6s -> 4f -> 5d -> 6p -> 7s -> 5f -> 6d -> 7p -> 5g -> 6f -> 7d -> 6g -> 7f -> 6h -> 7g -> 7h -> 8s -> 5g -> 6f -> 7d -> 8p -> 9s

So for Osmium, its full designation would be:
1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d10 4p6 5s2 4d10 5p6 6s2 4f14 5d6

or, in shorthand notation:
[Xe] 4f14 5d6 6s2

So Os has 2 + 2 + 6 + 2 + 6 + 2 + 10 + 6 + 2 + 10 + 6 + 2 + 14 + 6 = 76 electrons

It also has 76 protons, and 116 neutrons, giving it an atomic weight of 190.233 amu.

So we write it as 192/76Os.

Now, if 192/76Os underwent electron capture (because we’ve suppressed resonant quantum vacuum wavemodes sustaining the bound electrons at their usual orbital radius in, for instance, a very well-shielded Casimir cavity), it would have 75 electrons, 75 protons and 117 neutrons.

That’s Rhenium-192… 75 electrons, 75 protons and 117 neutrons.

Now, that undergoes electron capture, giving it 74 electrons, 74 protons and 118 neutrons.

That’s Tungsten-192… 74 electrons, 74 protons and 118 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 73 electrons, 73 protons and 119 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Tantalum-190… 73 electrons, 73 protons and 117 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 72 electrons, 72 protons and 118 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Hafnium-188… 72 electrons, 72 protons and 116 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 71 electrons, 71 protons and 117 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 4 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Lutetium-184… 71 electrons, 71 protons and 113 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 70 electrons, 70 protons and 114 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Ytterbium-182… 70 electrons, 70 protons and 112 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 69 electrons, 69 protons and 113 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Thulium-179… 69 electrons, 69 protons and 110 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 68 electrons, 68 protons and 111 neutrons.

So we’re left with Erbium-179… 68 electrons, 68 protons and 111 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 67 electrons, 67 protons and 112 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 4 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Holmium-175… 67 electrons, 67 protons and 108 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 66 electrons, 66 protons and 109 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Dysprosium-173… 66 electrons, 66 protons and 107 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 65 electrons, 65 protons and 108 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Terbium-171… 65 electrons, 65 protons and 106 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 64 electrons, 64 protons and 107 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Gadolinium-169… 64 electrons, 64 protons and 105 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 63 electrons, 63 protons and 106 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Europium-167… 63 electrons, 63 protons and 104 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 62 electrons, 62 protons and 105 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Samarium-165… 62 electrons, 62 protons and 103 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 61 electrons, 61 protons and 104 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Promethium-163… 61 electrons, 61 protons and 102 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 60 electrons, 60 protons and 103 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Neodymium-161… 60 electrons, 60 protons and 101 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 59 electrons, 59 protons and 102 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Praseodymium-159… 59 electrons, 59 protons and 100 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 58 electrons, 58 protons and 101 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Cerium-157… 58 electrons, 58 protons and 99 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 57 electrons, 57 protons and 100 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutron (which beta decays to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Lanthanum-155… 57 electrons, 57 protons and 98 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 56 electrons, 56 protons and 99 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Barium-153… 56 electrons, 56 protons and 97 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 55 electrons, 55 protons and 98 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Cesium-151… 55 electrons, 55 protons and 96 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 54 electrons, 54 protons and 97 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 4 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Xenon-147… 54 electrons, 54 protons and 93 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 53 electrons, 53 protons and 94 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Iodine-144… 53 electrons, 53 protons and 91 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 52 electrons, 52 protons and 92 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Tellurium-142… 52 electrons, 52 protons and 90 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 51 electrons, 51 protons and 91 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Antimony-139… 51 electrons, 51 protons and 88 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 50 electrons, 50 protons and 89 neutrons.

So we’re left with Tin-139… 50 electrons, 50 protons and 89 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 49 electrons, 49 protons and 90 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Indium-137… 49 electrons, 49 protons and 88 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 48 electrons, 48 protons and 89 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 5 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Cadmium-132… 48 electrons, 48 protons and 84 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 47 electrons, 47 protons and 85 neutrons.

So we’re left with Silver-132… 47 electrons, 47 protons and 85 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 46 electrons, 46 protons and 86 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Palladium-129… 46 electrons, 46 protons and 83 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 45 electrons, 45 protons and 84 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 7 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Rhodium-122… 45 electrons, 45 protons and 77 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 44 electrons, 44 protons and 78 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Ruthenium-120… 44 electrons, 44 protons and 76 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 43 electrons, 43 protons and 77 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Technetium-118… 43 electrons, 43 protons and 75 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 42 electrons, 42 protons and 76 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Molybdenum-115… 42 electrons, 42 protons and 73 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 41 electrons, 41 protons and 74 neutrons.

So we’re left with Niobium-115… 41 electrons, 41 protons and 74 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 40 electrons, 40 protons and 75 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 1 neutron (which beta decays to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Zirconium-114… 40 electrons, 40 protons and 74 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 39 electrons, 39 protons and 75 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Yttrium-111… 39 electrons, 39 protons and 72 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 38 electrons, 38 protons and 73 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Strontium-108… 38 electrons, 38 protons and 70 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 37 electrons, 37 protons and 71 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Rubidium-106… 37 electrons, 37 protons and 69 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 36 electrons, 36 protons and 70 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 4 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Krypton-102… 36 electrons, 36 protons and 66 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 35 electrons, 35 protons and 67 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 1 neutron (which beta decays to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Bromine-101… 35 electrons, 35 protons and 66 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 34 electrons, 34 protons and 67 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 7 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Selenium-94… 34 electrons, 34 protons and 60 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 33 electrons, 33 protons and 61 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Arsenic-92… 33 electrons, 33 protons and 59 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 32 electrons, 32 protons and 60 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Germanium-89… 32 electrons, 32 protons and 57 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 31 electrons, 31 protons and 58 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Gallium-86… 31 electrons, 31 protons and 55 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 30 electrons, 30 protons and 56 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Zinc-83… 30 electrons, 30 protons and 53 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 29 electrons, 29 protons and 54 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Copper-80… 29 electrons, 29 protons and 51 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving 28 electrons, 28 protons and 52 neutrons.

So we’re left with Nickel-80… 28 electrons, 28 protons and 52 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 27 electrons, 27 protons and 53 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 5 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Cobalt-75… 27 electrons, 27 protons and 48 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 26 electrons, 26 protons and 49 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Iron-72… 26 electrons, 26 protons and 46 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 25 electrons, 25 protons and 47 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Manganese-69… 25 electrons, 25 protons and 44 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 24 electrons, 24 protons and 45 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Chromium-67… 24 electrons, 24 protons and 43 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 23 electrons, 23 protons and 44 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Vanadium-65… 23 electrons, 23 protons and 42 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 22 electrons, 22 protons and 43 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Titanium-63… 22 electrons, 22 protons and 41 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 21 electrons, 21 protons and 42 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Scandium-61… 21 electrons, 21 protons and 40 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 20 electrons, 20 protons and 41 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 1 neutron (which beta decays to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Calcium-60… 20 electrons, 20 protons and 40 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 19 electrons, 19 protons and 41 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 1 neutron (which beta decays to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Potassium-59… 19 electrons, 19 protons and 40 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 18 electrons, 18 protons and 41 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 5 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Argon-54… 18 electrons, 18 protons and 36 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 17 electrons, 17 protons and 37 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Chlorine-52… 17 electrons, 17 protons and 35 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 16 electrons, 16 protons and 36 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Sulfur-49… 16 electrons, 16 protons and 33 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 15 electrons, 15 protons and 34 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 2 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Phosphorus-47… 15 electrons, 15 protons and 32 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 14 electrons, 14 protons and 33 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Silicon-44… 14 electrons, 14 protons and 30 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 13 electrons, 13 protons and 31 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 1 neutron (which beta decays to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Aluminum-43… 13 electrons, 13 protons and 30 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 12 electrons, 12 protons and 31 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Magnesium-40… 12 electrons, 12 protons and 28 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 11 electrons, 11 protons and 29 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 1 neutron (which beta decays to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Sodium-39… 11 electrons, 11 protons and 28 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 10 electrons, 10 protons and 29 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 5 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Neon-34… 10 electrons, 10 protons and 24 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 9 electrons, 9 protons and 25 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Fluorine-31… 9 electrons, 9 protons and 22 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 8 electrons, 8 protons and 23 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Oxygen-28… 8 electrons, 8 protons and 20 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 7 electrons, 7 protons and 21 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Nitrogen-25… 7 electrons, 7 protons and 18 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 6 electrons, 6 protons and 19 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Carbon-22… 6 electrons, 6 protons and 16 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 5 electrons, 5 protons and 17 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 1 neutron (which beta decays to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Boron-21… 5 electrons, 5 protons and 16 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 4 electrons, 4 protons and 17 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 5 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Beryllium-16… 4 electrons, 4 protons and 12 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 3 electrons, 3 protons and 13 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Lithium-13… 3 electrons, 3 protons and 10 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 2 electrons, 2 protons and 11 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Helium-10… 2 electrons, 2 protons and 8 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 1 electron, 1 proton and 9 neutrons.

That’s an unstable configuration… it’ll spit out 3 neutrons (which each beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds).

So we’re left with Hydroggen-7… 1 electron, 1 proton and 6 neutrons.

That undergoes electron capture, giving it 0 electrons, 0 protons and thus nothing holding the remaining 6 neutrons together in the nucleus.. all 7 neutrons then beta decay to a proton and a W- boson (which decays to an electron and an electron antineutrino) in 879.6±0.8 seconds.

Further, every single proton is comprised of two Up quarks (charge +2/3) and one Down quark (charge -1/3), giving it a total charge of +1… without the energy of the quantum vacuum providing the gluons to hold the quarks together, the proton dissociates into energy.

How much energy? Well, we know:
E = m c^2

E = 1 kg (89875517873681764) = 89875517873681764 J = 24965421632 kWh kg-1

We know that 1 amu = 1.66054019999e-27 kg.

We know that Osmium is 190.233 amu, so one atom weighs 3.1588954386469767e-25 kg.

3.1588954386469767e-25 kg (89875517873681764) = 2.839073634572081505280982765229e-8 J atom-1 = 7.8863156515891e-12 Wh atom-1

6.02214076e23 atoms mol−1 * 2.839073634572081505280982765229e-8 J atom-1 = 17097301055397877.190994761563343 J mol-1

6.02214076e23 atoms mol−1 * 7.8863156515891e-12 Wh atom-1 = 4749250293.1660677881716 kWh mol-1

How much does a mol of Osmium weigh?

190.233 amu * 6.02214076e23 atoms mol−1 = 114560990319708000000000000 amu = 0.1902331298 kg

That 4749.250293166067 GIGAWATT HOURS for 190.2331298 grams of matter.

And that is the technology we need to power the world and move us up the Kardashev scale. It’d also be a handy way of dealing with nuclear waste (any waste, really).

73. Kooks, you’ve seen this tech in area 51 or something??

74. boomie789 says:

We use to have resistances we don’t have anymore. We don’t punish behavior anymore. We used to exclude and banish people from our societies and institutions.

We actually punish behavior that would improve the health of society now. Then promote behavior that weakens it. We’ve been in this reformation since 45-64, at least. We are quite a few generations in.

We are being domesticated. In truth we always were. Instead of being domesticated for national interest, in the NWO the goyim must be domesticated for international global interest.

But to answer your question get together with like minded people and build the society you want. Build big walls and arm yourself well. The most intolerant will inherent the earth.

75. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

Joseph E. Postma wrote:
“Kooks, you’ve seen this tech in area 51 or something??”

No, this is something I’m attempting to develop, along with several other projects. The problem is that advances in technology not only free sane humanity from the everyday drudgery of manual labor and the uncertainty of subsistence-living, it empowers the insane. You can imagine what the libtards would do with a bomb using this technology, with enough yield to flatten a city, small enough to carry in a backpack and cheap enough to build at home with the right knowledge.

As a comparison, 2.336565 kg of invariant-mass matter would produce as much energy as the largest nuclear weapon ever tested (50 megaton Tsar Bomba).

76. Joseph E Postma says:

Exactly right boomie. It has been completely inverted. Instead of punishing bad behaviour, we reward it, and we punish healthy behaviour.

It’s because we’ve been turned into a society of sheep…as I’ve explained previously, what do sheep love? Sheep love being around weak herd-mates, because it makes them feel safer, because weak herd mates are the ones that get eaten. Sheep love to be surrounded by the weak, degenerate, infirm, crippled, sickly, unfit, fat, out of shape, etc., because it makes them feel so, so very safe; higher odds that others will be eaten, and not them. Promote others to be weak – that’s the best strategy for social interaction. Seriously…that is the entirety of their social psychology.

Wolves, on the other hand, love to be surrounded (in their pack) by the fit, strong, capable, intelligent, etc., because they depend upon each other for the hunt, for survival. In a wolf pack, the weak are never tolerated.

ALL of our movies for several generations are about how the weak are just as good as the strong.

It’s simply a blatant lie.

Anyway…the sheep really are sheep. Bill Cooper is the one who first came up with that term – the sheople. It really, really is the perfect psychological description for them. The sheep hate seeing strength and merit and power in other sheep…they HATE IT. Why do they hate it? Because it means that the odds of them being the meal just went up…and so they do everything in their power to make the strong weaker than themselves.

Wolves LOVE seeing other strong wolves….because it means that the odds of them getting a meal goes up.

Sheep are completely dysgenic, without the wolf to remove the sick. Like that excerpt from Never Cry Wolf in the book.

77. Joseph E Postma says:

“The question is: What do we do to bring life back to some semblance of normality? They won’t stop until they’ve destroyed everything, so destroying them seems increasingly to be the only solution.”

It certainly is. The wolves must be let loose. Cleanse the land of the sick, weak, degenerate, and disgusting.

78. Joseph E Postma says:

” it empowers the insane”

Given the discussion about sheep, etc., yes, I come to the conclusion nowadays that providing high technology to the mentally retarded, to the sheep, is an error, indeed, an evil. Plato must have written about it. Nature tells us: justice is the interest of the stronger. That’s how nature does it. Nature is truth, in many respects. All of this politics and law we have is anti-nature…providing power to the weak. It begins to disgust me…the idea of 80-IQ, let alone 118 IQ midwits, flying around the entire globe in technology produced by >145 IQ, so that they can amuse themselves with food from other cultures. Look up the spic-nig cycle.

https://imgs.search.brave.com/MaBW-eIR3nabGU15SNOP_ODOBkH9QQpJdM39Cf3jcic/rs:fit:650:718:1/g:ce/aHR0cHM6Ly9tZWRp/YS5jb25zdW1lcHJv/ZHVjdC53aW4vcG9z/dC80M3VpWVFLbS5w/bmc

79. boomie789 says:
80. Joseph E Postma says:

Right now, the sheep are the strong (in control, en-masse), and what are they doing? Well, they’re doing what’s in their interest. What else do the strong do when they have the power?

And what’s in the interest of the sheep? It’s quite simple: to make each other weak. Seriously…that’s it. That’s all that the sheep want to do, is to make others weak.

That’s also what parasites like, and benefit from. The sheep might not be parasites, but all parasites love sheep psychology. Parasites will do everything that they can to support sheep psychology. Hence why the parasites in government do just that.

We must return to a wolf-pack psychology…to fascism, like the NSDAP began…which of course the parasites and the sheep tricked the stupid dogs into destroying…and now the parasites are simply enjoying a feeding frenzy while the sheep assist them in destroying it all, feeling safe for it but not realizing that their entire world is being destroyed….the sheep just “feel safe” for it as they watch other sheep further and further degrade.

81. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

There’s a difference between being strong and being a member of a stupidity-induced fear-stampede. Both can do damage… one is intentional damage, the other is damage done due to blind fear and a headlong stampede over the cliff with the rest of the unthinking lackwits.

Not sure what you mean by your NSDAP comment… the Nazis were left-wing (my modern metrics) the whole while. Don’t let contemporary leftists fool you… Hitler and his crew were left-wing socialists, not right-wing… they just feinted slightly right of Gregor Strasser’s party as a means of gaining power… then once they had that power, they went back to full-blown socialist. It was a deliberate plan, it worked, and they’d planned nearly from the start to engage in the horrors they did.

No, what we need is a wolf-pack mentality protecting what makes a wolf-pack strong… the freedom to rise (or sink) to your deserved level, the freedom from being dragged down to a lower level so some mushy-brained maleducated halfwit isn’t feign-offended, the freedom to keep what we earn without being forced to support the intentionally useless parasitical moochers who are so stupid that they’d destroy those who are forced to support them.

There’s a reason the moochers always end up starving in the streets, dying in the gutter… it can be no other way.

82. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

“by modern metrics”

83. boomie789 says:

Right wing socialism is the strengthening of the folk(familiar blood) with national priorities and eugenics.

Right wing socialism is about the blood of the nation, not its economy.

The folk serving the economy =left socialism

The economy serving the folk= right wing socialism.

84. Joseph E Postma says:

Yes, what boomie said, and I am not a Libertarian. I wish for standards for society. I don’t know how many libertarians I’ve talked to who promote the values of prostitution for our daughters and drug use for our sons, “If that’s what they choose to do with themselves then so be it. It’s the parents fault for making shit children. Prostitution is the oldest profession. We’re stoned apes.” Etc. etc.

We CAN have a society and government which actually helps citizens, and doesn’t let people just fall through the cracks.

I’ve followed many economists and I’ve come to understand one thing about them and libertarians and most Christians today: their God is money. If it makes money, it is a good, a moral good, a necessary good, an unquestionable good, and anything which prevents the exchange of money is an evil. It’s the economy, stupid!

Humanity doesn’t exist to service money, the existence of money, the exchange of money, the expansion of money, the hegemony of money, etc. Humanity can exist for greater things.

It’s the moocher class who make it all about the money.

“No, what we need is a wolf-pack mentality protecting what makes a wolf-pack strong… the freedom to rise (or sink) to your deserved level, the freedom from being dragged down to a lower level so some mushy-brained maleducated halfwit isn’t feign-offended, the freedom to keep what we earn without being forced to support the intentionally useless parasitical moochers who are so stupid that they’d destroy those who are forced to support them.”

Well said! That’s right-wing socialism. The Nation as the pack. This is why the moochers hate nationalism and want globalism so badly…they don’t want to risk the rise of a wolf-pack nation again.

85. boomie789 says:
86. Nepal says:

@LolKooks,

“Now, if 192/76Os underwent electron capture (because we’ve suppressed resonant quantum vacuum wavemodes sustaining the bound electrons at their usual orbital radius in, for instance, a very well-shielded Casimir cavity), it would have 75 electrons, 75 protons and 117 neutrons.”

Wow. This theory you have where “vacuum wavemodes sustain the bound electrons at their usual orbital radius” sure do have some amazing implications. In earlier comment you used this theory to propose a source of infinite energy. Now you’re using it to transmute an element into any other element you want, just like the alchemists sought, simply by passing the elements through a little tube!

Talk about a two-for-one. Perpetual motion and alchemical transmutation, the two biggest problems physicists have been saying are impossible since the 1400s.

“Oh ye seekers after perpetual motion, how many vain chimeras have you pursued? Go and take your place with the alchemists.”
— Leonardo da Vinci, 1494

87. Nepal says:

Yes, minute quantities of certain elements can be produced in nuclear reactors. That is not the same as producing kilograms of whatever element you want, and “ cheap enough to build at home.”

88. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

Nepal wrote:
“This theory you have where “vacuum wavemodes sustain the bound electrons at their usual orbital radius” sure do have some amazing implications.”

Not my theory… it’s the result of the proper application of quantum theory and the fundamental physical laws… even NASA acknowledges this reality, why can’t you, Nepal? Is it because then you couldn’t use your egregious violation of the fundamental physical laws to push your claim that energy can flow willy-nilly without regard to energy density, which is the underlying basis of the ‘backradiation’ claim of the climate loons, which is the underlying basis of CAGW? LOL

[3] https://web.archive.org/web/20190713225420/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13330878_Ground_state_of_hydrogen_as_a_zero-point-fluctuation-determined_state
“We show here that, within the stochastic electrodynamic formulation and at the level of Bohr theory, the ground state of the hydrogen atom can be precisely defined as resulting from a dynamic equilibrium between radiation emitted due to acceleration of the electron in its ground-state orbit and radiation absorbed from zero-point fluctuations of the background vacuum electromagnetic field, thereby resolving the issue of radiative collapse of the Bohr atom.”

[4] https://web.archive.org/web/20180719194558/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20150006842.pdf
“The energy level of the electron is a function of its potential energy and kinetic energy. Does this mean that the energy of the quantum vacuum integral needs to be added to the treatment of the captured electron as another potential function, or is the energy of the quantum vacuum somehow responsible for establishing the energy level of the ‘orbiting’ electron? The only view to take that adheres to the observations would be the latter perspective, as the former perspective would make predictions that do not agree with observation.”

89. CD Marshall says:

I know quite a bit of scientists and engineers hit this place, the climate models are garbage I know this, not much of an argument though unless it’s a troll. I know very little about the details of the models other than the one I looked into a while ago.

Anyone want to grit your teeth and read through this and tell me what’s actually going on?

As to any info on the common models they love to use

From 1979+ they look coerced natural variability doesn’t look like a hockey stick.
The list:
NASA GISS
NOAA
Japan Met.
Berkely Earth
Australia BOM
GHCN

90. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

Well, it looks like the woketard cancel mob finally got to Lubos Motl… his blog is down, showing a log-in screen. Blogspot, owned by Google. Google, populated with woketard cancel mob millennials and weak-kneed oldsters who bow to the woketard cancel mob millennials.

If you’ve got IP on any of the woketard-infested platforms, get it off now, the woketards are on the march, stupidity will prevail.

91. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

Nepal wrote:
“Talk about a two-for-one. Perpetual motion and alchemical transmutation, the two biggest problems physicists have been saying are impossible since the 1400s.”

First, as you’ve been repeatedly told, it’s not perpetual motion, you just can’t fathom where the energy is coming from. And it’s not “infinite energy”… it lasts until universal quantum vacuum energy density drops to the point that invariant-mass matter is no longer meta-stable and dissociates (dehadronizes… which, if you’ve been paying attention, is really what I’ve been talking about) back into energy and fundamental particles as the universe drops into a new meta-stable state.

Normally, we study a false vacuum by adding energy to get it up and over the barrier, or we attempt to induce it to tunnel through the barrier to the true vacuum state, or a combination of the two prior methods.

The universe is almost certainly in a false vacuum (meta-stable) state:
https://sci-hub.se/10.3389/fspas.2018.00040
“One of the most striking results of the discovery of Higgs boson (Aad et al., 2012; Chatrchyan
et al., 2012) has been that its mass lies in a regime that predicts the current vacuum state to be
a false vacuum, that is, there is a lower energy vacuum state available to which the electroweak
vacuum can decay into (Degrassi et al., 2012; Buttazzo et al., 2013). That this was a possibility in
the Standard Model (SM) has been known for a long time (Hung, 1979; Sher, 1993; Casas et al.,
1996; Isidori et al., 2001; Ellis et al., 2009; Elias-Miro et al., 2012).”

There is another way… create an artificially-lower quantum vacuum energy density. That essentially puts that ‘bubble’ of space-time into the true vacuum state (or any vacuum state you wish which is lower energy density than the false (meta-stable) vacuum state).

Again, this is standard quantum physics. Why can’t you accept that reality, Nepal? Is it because then you’d have no way of shilling for your claim that energy can flow willy-nilly without regard to energy density gradient, which is the underlying basis of the ‘backradiation’ claim of the climate loons, which is the underlying basis of CAGW? LOL

Second, you should feel honored that you’re acquainted (however remotely) with the one person in history who’s ‘connected the dots’ to make possible that which has been claimed to be impossible “since the 1400s”. LOL

92. Richard says:

L@KKK,
The problem with you is that you believe everything the so called science is telling you is true.
There is no physical thing called space-time, there is no dark energy, no dark matter, no black hole, there was no big bang.
The only thing that is important here is the awareness that “the average” is not the real thing.

93. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

You remind me of Ken Wheeler (aka Theoria Apophasis), another who has conceived of a hobby-theory which claims there is no space-time; that there exists only one particle type in the universe; that that particle can change form, mass and size (by orders of magnitude!) seemingly at will and with no impetus; that light travels at a speed proportional to the radiant exitance of its emitter; that there is no mass-energy equivalency; etc., etc., etc…

For a laugh (or a cry, if you bought into Wheeler’s drivel), read:
https://overunity.com/14767/ultimate-proof-of-magnetic-vortex-free-book-and-videos/msg467819/#msg467819

He once aimed an IR camera at a bismuth sphere sat next to an absurdly strong neodymium magnet and claimed that the magnet was causing the sphere to give off heat that one could see in the camera. Being an ‘expert’ in cameras, supposedly, it somehow never occurred to him that the shape of that heat signature looked suspiciously like the shape of a human, that it moved when he moved… it was his own body heat reflecting off the shiny metal surface of the sphere. LOL

He also made a coil of many turns of very fine wire, hooked it up to an LED, then held it over an absurdly strong magnet, claiming that he was generating electricity to light the LED without relative motion to the magnetic field… he didn’t notice, I guess, that when his hand was truly still in relation to the magnetic field, the LED went out, and that the random motions of his hand was the relative motion generating the electricity. Suspending the coil / LED from a stand above the magnet showed no light from the LED. LOL

He’s likewise redefined many long-known and well-defined definitions, while twisting the definitions just enough to fit his odd hobby-theory… I read his book. I understand his book, I was able to ‘translate’ his redefinitions back into standard scientific language and show that he really doesn’t know much of anything about how magnets (or science) works.

And of course, as all crackpots do, he takes credit for things he didn’t invent, conceive of or discover… one of his most egregious was magnetotropism, which was discovered in 1960 by LJ Audus; but even his crackpot hobby-theory was largely stolen from Dollardian Theory, Circlon Theory and bit and pieces of other theories he cobbled together.

And of course, when he’s confronted by those who really don’t understand his book but intuitively understand that what he says can’t be true, he goes on a profanity-laced tirade. He never did that with me, he tucked tail and slunk away… not just from that thread, but from that forum entirely.

Are you a Ken Wheeler acolyte, Richard?

94. Zelator says:

Kooks what do you make of the Solar Helix theory By Dr. Keshava Bhat?

See here:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120810080058/https://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/2012/04/solar-helix-spiral-orbits-and-new.html

Also Cliff High discusses it for the first 20 minutes or so of this video.

p.s his discussion about the Nummo in the 2nd part of the video is equally fascinating.

Thanks Z

95. Zelator says:

Joe, these Zetas you talk about in your book, these are the same Zetas that Beverly Nation talks about on her Youtube channel?

So that would make them according to her analysis the Cabal, Illuminati, NWO?.

I assume she is the clairaudient channel that you contacted and speak about in your book? Who also contributes on here under her Handle: Beverly Nation.

<… ::: …< ….::~< …< :::}………{ ::~< ::: …< ::~: …: } …::: ‘.’.’. :::…<… ::: …< ….::~< … {…::….} …>

Hi Beverly, I am glad to have found your work. I am reading/watching your not insurmountable material you have published. It is very interesting.

Cheers Z.

p.s Z is for Zelator btw, not Zeta lol. Just as the Z on the Russian tanks is not Zeta ( as in the alien).

You can test me if you like: I am sure you already have. Also the fact I’m Rhesus Negative may well skew your results, but I assure you I am not Cabal or of that ilk; but I am also not the same type of human as about 85% of the PRESENT Earth’s population. I understand the scalar subtle energy signature that we all give off or as Joe says your ontological unique code.

Its also viewable, photo-recordable remotely ( what Hockney implied). For more information on this sort of phenomenom see Nuclear Evolution by Christopher Hills.

Everything is recorded in the Akashic Records. So you have unique book all about yourself.

pps. Beverley in reference to your above video, and the colours of Blue and Yellow, do you think it has to do with the vibration of the Chakras and their current locations and endocrine gland effects?

Each color reflects a type of vibration or frequency radiating through the chakras:

Meaning of the yellow chakra color: is the color of the solar plexus chakra (third chakra); it symbolizes mental activities, intellect, personal power, will.

Meaning of the blue chakra color: Blue is the color of the throat chakra (fifth chakra); it symbolizes self expression, expression of truth, creative expression, communication, perfect form and patterns

https://www.chakras.info/chakra-colors/

96. Zelator says:

P>S my knowing is that the “G” is the Generative Principle – the sex magic, the kundalini, the latent serpent force.

97. Zelator says:

Well not so much the kundalini as the sex force, the power, the orgasm. The mini creation.
You have to realise these Satanists are sex magicians using human energy as sacrificial offerings to their masters. Loosh in all its forms is a commodity these demons trade and feed on.

98. Zelator says:

That’s what they are. zetas, aliens, djinn, archons, whatever you want to call them, these are the demons of King Solomon.

99. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

Zelator wrote:
“Kooks what do you make of the Solar Helix theory By Dr. Keshava Bhat?”

Not sure about the entirety of his theory nor his conclusions, but he gets the movement of the planets about the sun mostly correct. In the video below, if you imagine a bulls-eye target overlay on the video, then imagine that bulls-eye tilting a bit toward the black hole at the galactic center as the sun orbits that black hole, you’ll get an idea of why the planets go above and below the galactic ecliptic.

Sort of like this:

… but with the sun ‘dragging’ the planets along, the acceleration due to the turning of that bulls-eye sling-shots the planets ahead of the sun for half the cycle (on the outer half of the axis), and behind for half (on the inner half of the axis).

A very rough analogy:
So for this exercise, you have to imagine you’re in space and that you’re the sun. You’ve got a ball on a string which will be a planet. You hold the string close to and just ahead of yourself, and whirl the ball in a counter-clockwise circle.

Now, you get onto a large merry-go-round, facing in the direction that merry-go-round rotates, as you continue to whip that ball around. As the ball is exactly at its apex, headed down and to your left (away from the axis of the merry-go-round), the centrifugal force of you whipping the ball around yourself and the centrifugal force of the merry-go-round whipping you around its axis (the axis being the black hole at the center of our galaxy), are additive, so the ball will tend to accelerate.

Once the ball reaches its antapex and starts heading up and to your right (toward the axis of the merry-go-round) the centrifugal force of you whipping the ball around yourself and the centrifugal force of the merry-go-round whipping you around its axis are subtractive, so the ball will tend to decelerate.

You’ll note that this will tend to tilt the path of the ball so that it is closer to you (in your direction of travel) on the part of the swing when it’s nearer the merry-go-round’s axis, and farther ahead of you (in your direction of travel) when it’s farther from the merry-go-round’s axis. The path of the ball tilts, just as you see in the animated .gif above.

100. Zelator says:

Thankyou for the reply LOLKooks. That makes sense from the premise I put to you. Great answer. Much appreciated. Need to integrate that into my knowledge base. It never fits until/unless you see it from different perspectives/perceptions of which we all have many different overlays/filters natural and unnatural, were we need to bi-pass critical factor belief systems that can block knowledge coming in if deemed a threat to programmed mindsets.
Cheers Z

101. Zelator says:

So would you say to sum it up simply, it’s the effect of rotation versus anti-rotational forces of the planetary bodies effects/influences combined that governs the position of the spheres in the tail of the suns forward thrust vortex? So where is the 3d dimensional Plane? i.e Existence? It has to be on a neutral plane?

102. boomie789 says:

103. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

Click to access US20070241470A1.pdf

[3] https://web.archive.org/web/20190713225420/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13330878_Ground_state_of_hydrogen_as_a_zero-point-fluctuation-determined_state
“We show here that, within the stochastic electrodynamic formulation and at the level of Bohr theory, the ground state of the hydrogen atom can be precisely defined as resulting from a dynamic equilibrium between radiation emitted due to acceleration of the electron in its ground-state orbit and radiation absorbed from zero-point fluctuations of the background vacuum electromagnetic field, thereby resolving the issue of radiative collapse of the Bohr atom.”

[4] https://web.archive.org/web/20180719194558/https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20150006842.pdf
“The energy level of the electron is a function of its potential energy and kinetic energy. Does this mean that the energy of the quantum vacuum integral needs to be added to the treatment of the captured electron as another potential function, or is the energy of the quantum vacuum somehow responsible for establishing the energy level of the ‘orbiting’ electron? The only view to take that adheres to the observations would be the latter perspective, as the former perspective would make predictions that do not agree with observation.”

I use the same concept above, just taken to its logical conclusion… rather than just suppressing resonant quantum vacuum wavemodes such that bound electron orbital radius is reduced in order to induce the bound electron to emit a photon, I suppress it completely to cause induced electron capture decay.

104. Nepal says:

“ Second, you should feel honored that you’re acquainted (however remotely) with the one person in history who’s ‘connected the dots’ to make possible that which has been claimed to be impossible “since the 1400s”. LOL”

Oh sweet summer child. There are 10s of thousands of people who felt the exact same way as you, thought they had secret to infinite energy or alchemy, and zero of them were correct. You’re good at maths, let’s do some probability. Is it more likely that you’re part of the zero percent, or just another of the 10s of thousands?

You keep referring to your stochastic electrodynamics as “standard quantum theory.” It is not. First it is not quantum. It tries to replace quantum electrodynamics with classical electrodynamics and classical vacuum. Your paper [1] is titled “Random electrodynamics: The theory of classical electrodynamics with classical zero-point radiation.” Second it is not standard, it is fringe theory with no convincing experimental support.

I’m sorry I let this bug me so much, but perpetual motion and alchemy? I just can’t stand it. It’s nonsense.

105. Zelator – I see you found me. I try to stay low-key in this group because the intellect here is off the charts. I observe and learn. Joe has taught me so much since I started my work. Much of what you hear me talk about comes from Joe’s teachings. Math and nature are the physical representation of ONE. They are the plumb line for us. Regarding the blue and yellow related to chakras. I reject the common teachings of chakras. Every atom of our bodies is a chakra. The 8 spinning colored balls inside us comes from religion, which comes from zetas. They dumb everything down. I will say that based on magnetism, yellow and blue are lower frequency colors. The highest frequency color we can see with human eyes is violet, right before ultra-violet. But to your point, I am very sure there is a reason they are using yellow and blue and it centers on holding us back. Thanks for following my work. Some days I think I have lost my mind, but Joe confirms that what I get makes sense. So I keep going. It is great to meet someone who understands the enemy we face on Earth.

106. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

You’re reaching, Nepal. Which tells me you’re out of your depth… your depth apparently being your inability to even understand the fundamental physical laws, let alone anything deeper. LOL

Who says it’s solely stochastic electrodynamics? All theories are just means of explaining physical phenomena. You’ll note that the third and fourth papers are standard quantum theory.

In point of fact, SEDs not only covers all phenomena explicable by QED, but several which aren’t… the physical origin of the ZP field, the neutrino rest mass anomaly, the origin and quantitative treatment of 1/f noise, and the high-energy tail of cosmic rays.

So while the ZP field may be modeled as a classical Lorentz-invariant radiation field (because the quantum nature of the source of that field (ie: every single atom in the universe, every single physical phenomena which causes emission of EM radiation) is ‘smeared out’ macroscopically), quantum theory still comes into play because bound electron photon emission is still quantum in nature, still dependent upon the bound electron having an integer number of de Broglie waves at any given orbital radius.

And it is that orbital radius in all cases discussed which we are manipulating.

So, are you going to now claim that manipulating bound electron orbital radius won’t result in the emission (for a downward quantum jump) or absorption (for an upward quantum jump) of a photon?

Are you going to now claim that a bound electron (a point charge) undergoing angular acceleration in relation to its electric field won’t emit Larmor radiation in the form of virtual photons? If so, how then do you explain the fact that every single element in the Periodic Table exhibits some form of magnetism (dia, para, ferri, ferro), virtual photons being that which mediates magnetism?

For instance:

https://i.imgur.com/k9DMAl3.png

Yeah, I built my own Periodic Table.

Are you going to now claim that a bound electron with no energy to sustain its orbital radius will somehow just continue orbiting, rather than being attracted to the oppositely-charged nucleal proton(s)? Do you deny that electrons and protons attract? LOL

What sustains bound electrons at their orbital radius in your kooky world, Nepal? Because in the real world, it’s the energy density of the local quantum vacuum.

107. Zelator says:

Beverly, you won’t go wrong with Joe as your friend, He is fully switched on, and your work is equally important. I am glad to have found you. Cheers Z

p.s I am also going to look at the chakra teachings, I have heard the same thing also that you pointed out.