In this video I discuss the nature of the enemy we face which seeks to end all life on Earth.
Support:
BTC: 1EeURvMjtGUxznP44cM6iSdDAqzjNUJFr8
PayPal:
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/joepostma
GiveSendGo:
https://www.givesendgo.com/ontologicalmathematics
Climate of Sophistry 
Human CO2 emissions have a negligle effect on the atmospheric concentration of CO2. The spectrum of radiation which is absorbed by CO2 is saturated a few meters above ground level. If CO2 concentration increases, then the radiation absorption is saturated at a slighly lower level, the distance is logarithmic, not linear. This energy is radiated upwards and also transferred to the surrounding air molecules and transferred upward via convection. It is not radiated downwards. In the stratosphere, CO2 radiates energy into outer space because the temperature of space is 2.73 degrees Kelvin. More CO2 will cool the atmosphere by radiating energy to outer space. Energy in equals energy out, and CO2 acts as a negative feedback to modulate the temperature of the atmosphere.
Joseph:
Thank you for your work, I grasp most of it although sometimes not until the third time I hear it. So I am quite glad when you combine new material with existing slides, I never tire of your explanations of light energy striking only part of the [obviously] globe planet. Cheers, Stanley FossAllentown, PA
Cheers Stanley!
Joe:
From Y.C. Zhong https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yc-Zhong
Why Is the 1st Satellite Observation Sidelined? | Independent Climate Research | 6 Nov. 2023
Transcript
Now. It’s high time to show the earliest reported satellite observation, called spectral radiance of the earth, namely, OLR. As you can see immediately, the observation range was remarkably similar to that reported by Dr Hanel six years later.
12. It could be argued that the observed OLR was dominated by the transmitted, and a bit of emitted, infrared rays inside and near the atmospheric window, as shown in this diagram.
13. Notice that the infrared detector was in space towards the ground, called the nadir direction, while, Hanel’s observation was on the ground towards space, called the zenith direction.
14. Who did this satellite observation? They are Louis Block and Alex Zachor. Interestingly enough, Block was in the Air Force Lab while Zachor was with Block engineering who built the Frourir Transfomr Infrared Spectrometer onboard for NASA. Could this Block be a family member of the Block whose company built this portable Fourier Transform infrared interferonmeter?
15. Compared with the IRIS spectrometer used in for Nimbus, the instrumental uncertainties were relatively high and the spectral resolution was poor, as openly admitted by the two authors in their paper.
16. Nevertheless, their pioneering work in exploring atmospheric infrared properties should not be underestimated and sidelined by climate researchers. Here are the reasons why.
17. First, this early satellite observation of OLR provides the first direct experimental evidence for the detectable spectral radiance of the Earth from the top of the atmosphere, although the instrumental range was confined to 1.9 to 15 micron.
18. To compare with Dr Hanel’s observation on the ground, I have digitally transformed the reported infrared spectrum, by Block and Zachor in 1962, into its wavenumber dependence, together with the theoretically predicted infrared spectrum, as shown in this diagram.
19. Second. The absorption by the ozone above the troposphere was evident, although the spectral resolution was poor, compared with the theoretically calculated ozone peak.
20. Third. It was directly observed that the spectral radiance of the Earth decreases dramatically to almost zero when wavenumber is less than 700 and larger than 1200 cm-1. This implies the Earth doesn’t radiate much, as it has been assumed. I will talk about this issue in the near future.
21. This becomes understandable some how, if we turn on the infrared absorption spectrum of water vapor, first observed by Rubens and Aschkinass. It could be argued that water vapor near the surface can effectively cool the heated surface during day time, together with nitrogen and oxygen molecules, outside the atmospheric window.
22. This observed spectral profile from a satellite is very similar to what Dr Hanel observed on the ground, if the two spectra are superimposed as shown in this diagram. Of course, some noticeable differences between the two infrared spectra can be seen, due to the different spectral resolutions used.
23. In essence, no CO2 signals were observed, which was also consistent with the calculated spectral radiance. I think that is the reason why this early satellite observation of OLR has been sidelined for over 60 years in climate research, dominated by the Greenhouse Effect hypothesis.
24. I hope you could understand this. In order to detect any infrared absorption by a particular gas in the atmosphere, the gas, say, CO2 at 15 micron, must be excited in the first place. In short, the absorption can only be worked out from the observed transmission of any infrared source.
25. Remember, therefore, whenever the transmitted infrared is zero, which could mean either the incident infrared ray has been completely absorbed or there is not infrared source at all. In both cases, no more additional absorption should happen.
26. Next year, I will discuss the most influential, but fabricated, spectrum of the upward radiance of the Earth, or OLR, over the past half century. Before that, more relevant backgrounds will be discussed. Please stay tuned and support this channel.
Block, L.C. and Zachor, A.S., 1964. Inflight satellite measurements of infrared spectral radiance of the Earth. Applied Optics, 3(2), pp.209-214.
https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-3-2-209
Have you ever seen such a stupid comment as the first.? If the sun didn’t heat the earth in the first place how would back radiation work.
Cheers.
justgivemeall ,
How does back radiation work?
Joe, with the Globalists and Greens and Communists and Jihadi Muslims making significant advances, your articles are badly needed. They should be part of science curriculum in every school in every country.
I know. It’s such great stuff for teaching critical thinking. Maybe this world is supposed to be destroyed? Many people make a good argument for it. But no…this world could be great, and then again, what’s the point of existing if you’re not struggling to the death.
That’s the point it doesn’t work. And even if you think it did where would the energy come from in the first place.
Joe, good points. The world will not last forever, nothing does, but we can certainly make life on this planet better if we can drive the Globalists out of power.
justgivemeall, OK, I didn’t see a comment claiming that back radiation works. We are in agreement.
Totally agree Joedoes a great job of dispelling this myth. And no back radiation just does not exist.
@justgivemeall @TEWS_Pilot
Back radiation is a fictious radiation representation of a real atmospheric mass-motion process. The real process is adiabatic convection whereby solar energy is distributed across the surface of the globe by atmospheric air mass downwelling in anticyclonic pressure systems .
See Figure 3. The Thermal Radiant Opaque Atmospheric Reservoir Energy Recycling Process in The Application of the Dynamic Atmosphere Energy Transport Climate Model (DAET) to Earth’s Semi-Opaque Troposphere.
They’re going ahead with the TELE
https://www.fastcompany.com/90979568/in-californias-central-valley-a-massive-carbon-removal-factory-is-pulling-co2-from-the-air
Totally agree Phillip M , seems odd we need to make up ferry tales when we actually know how wx works.
Thanks Barry
These videos are a continuous onslaught to my intelligence.
God it’s so fn mixed up and stupid. They just mix up everything. And don’t explain anything. But the idiots love the quirky stupid production effects.
In the end he did the classic “If it vibrates more it has to increase heat” as if the atmosphere is a static isolated function.
I don’t want to pee in your watering hole, so I’ll only do this the once. I think your presentation contains some truth and some perversion of truth. This represents one of two possible situations: either you have some truth and in the interest of pursuing truth have delved too deeply and need to resurface, or you are knowingly spreading falsehood using a veneer of truth or else doing so on behalf of others with this intent.
Evidence and truth do not overlap perfectly with scientific materialism, as you say. But spirituality and esoterics have always been a trap set by those who oppose truth. Magic is nothing more than hypnosis or self-hypnosis to turn the mind against itself, and away from reality. Any thing that is real will leave evidence, and does not require mental self-exploration to be discerned.
For example, a spiritual or psychical truth could be validated if multiple people without any connection can report the same details and evolutionary psychology is ruled out. That is, if spiritual entities communicate in a way to prove their existence, and the channel for this evidence is properly documented and tested – yes, with the scientific method.
This has never been demonstrated, which I know doesn’t disprove it, but in the absence of proof, there is plenty of evidence that a lot of spiritual knowledge is hypnosis, psychological suggestion, and self-hypnosis.
Reality is seen via the epistemological integration of two things: Logos, and the liminal. Logos is not exactly what you refer to as Ontological Mathematics, however, I believe that what you aspire for O.M. to be, I would aspire for Logos to be, so let’s treat them as potentially or effectively the same thing. In addiction to Logos, is the liminal, the incomplete.
Ken of reality is the integration of these two. Logos is self-evident through mathematics, which is quite a mystery, but then again the existence of a real universe capable of generating experience and information from the realm of the unknown beyond ken is also quite a mystery. Taking each for granted, integrating them (no-contradiction, assigning weights so that the liminal door is left open), is ken of reality. Common sense realism.
There is a parallel structure which is used to create falsehoods in the mind. This is synthesis. Where mental knowns are integrated with mental unknowns. This becomes an epistemological synthesis. It is not validated through Logos. It is not integrated with material evidence. Thus, synthetic knowledge is easy to manipulate to create mental untruth.
For instance, a person’s own ignorance can exploit mental liminality where material liminality doesn’t exist (open the damn box Schrodinger!). Simultaneously, previous mental synthesis can replace Logos. This is where we derive concepts such as goalpost shifting or the Overton Window. Previous untrue synthesis can stand as true without being logical validated.
This allows for cognitive dissonance, since social pressure causes someone to emotionally prioritize mental syntheses that produce an outcome that leads to emotional rewards. High IQ is correlated with good material outcomes and its easy to see why logic checks fight cognitive dissonance to a degree.
Magick literature defines epistemology from the realm of mental synthesis. Do what thou wilt. Manifest. This rejects and disparages Logos.
The Zeta parasites can largely be explained through understanding the systems of hypnosis and magic employed against middle and lower IQ people. The cognitive dissonance of higher IQ people is explained by powerful mental syntheses which include tremendous social pressure and expertly designed narratives.
As an example of magic: the dialectic. A well-crafted dialectic will cause an inattentive person to sort information into categories which will subsequently hide the truth. It will harmonize mental and real liminality using powerful mental synthesis, but disparage Logos. People will perceive that their mental categories sufficiently answer for the real evidence they perceive in the material world. They do so within the mental system. The application of Logos takes work and intelligence. Well-designed dialectic narratives draw energy away from Logos.
This talk of Ontological Mathematics is interesting but slightly disturbing. It prioritizes Logos, which is good, but then introduces the falsehood of ignoring the liminal. Thus, the liminal is necessarily replaced. Here, with some sort of mystical notion of the mental soul which is upheld as a spiritual and ontological truth which cannot be substantiated with evidence. Aha! Here is our manipulative dialectic.
Note that magick systems typically come with esoteric orders that have hierarchies, veils of secrecy, rank, loyalty systems and so forth. This social mechanic uses game theory to enhance the effect of a hypnotic dialectic in a person’s life.
I appreciate the emphasis on Logos, pointing out cognitive dissonance in abuse of mental synthesis common to our manipulated world of today. I don’t appreciate the emphasis on truth obtained without reference to scientific evidence, and the invocation of the esoteric and magick, which as far as I can tell is little more than a system of hypnotic manipulation that actually abuses or disparages Logos.
Anyway, perhaps I have it wrong.
I don’t think a mental, otherly parasite inhabits the souls and brains of others.
Rather, I think real humans who are possessed by a powerful and intergenerational dialectic have propagated systems of magic and mental hypnosis to pursue an agenda which is more or less the one you describe. It is rebellion against reality. It is certainly a memetic parasite.
Is that the same thing effectively as a mental parasite? Maybe. However, in my view not so, if that also means astral projection, telepathy and telepathic immortality because someone did drugs once and after various instances of chaotic regrowth of important neural prunings, became convinced of an unreal thing and now lack the ability cognitively to disentangle the neurological damage.
@CD Marshall
“In the end he did the classic “If it vibrates more it has to increase heat” as if the atmosphere is a static isolated function.”
He does not even begin to mention flexure while holding a model that is continually flexing! It is as if he has never heard of Shear Waves and why polyatomic molecules absorb and emit thermal radiant energy.
Not knowingly spreading falsehood – only what I have found and been led to discover, conclude, and make sense of things. Delved too deeply or delved to the depth required to find the answer, which in fact no one else has ever provided. I’ve discovered reproducible facts, and those facts have a telos, and the telos has a source, reason, and motive. Simply sharing what I’ve found through experience, and through speculation and intuition which then became confirmed through experience.
Re: magic/esoteric/obe/etc/ There is certainly scientific evidence, but it is not the science you find in academia (although some has been performed there, but shut down). It is the evidence of countless people having independently discovered the same things and experienced the same phenomenon.
Re: mystery of existence – I have actually shown in the video and in the Illuminism book that existence itself is no longer a mystery. However, what has led to our human experience and why our human experience is the way it is, that certainly may remain a mystery, especially if there are way more advanced entities running this place for who knows what purposes.
Not sure that there is a conflict between logos and will power. Will is built in, and everything falls under logos – there is a reason for everything.
Yes, that is exactly how the Zetas operate. And yes, all sorts of mental manipulation can take place. That is exactly the game, especially when a parasite is running the world.
Any information at all could be couched as a manipulative dialectic – the truth would not be exempt from that, as it would “manipulate” you into truthful thinking.
Ontological Mathematics accepts the liminal and definitely justifies the existence of magic and other esoteric effects.
Yes, the Illuminist writers openly admit to playing the “Glass Bead Game” with the readers. Well, what else is there to do here?
I do not feel that I have resorted to anything outside of scientific evidence – I have presented the evidence, and then facing impossible paradox, found a solution which seems to explain things, through a method of liminal communication which itself was tested and confirmed for two years to provide confirmed results before moving forward with it and accepting it.
As you say – it reduces to a parasitical form of some method or another.
There are any number of books on the esoteric/magic/astral projection/telepathy/etc., from independent people from all over, and, you can learn to do some of these things yourself, reliably.
How do you test communicating with the Astral plane with the scientific method? Maybe let’s both find Hermes or St. Peter and ask for a code word.
Do they know the lottery numbers in the Astral plane?
Lol sorry
Haha.
I tried to leave a link to Rudolf Steiner on the Asuras, Ahriman and Lucifer. (equivalent of what you refer to as Zeta) It didn’t work for some reason but I really do think you’d be interested. The name is not important but rather the concept ascribed to it.