Says Greenpeace co-founder and former president of Greenpeace Canada Patrick Moore: “Fear has been used all through history to gain control of people’s minds and wallets and all else, and the climate catastrophe is strictly a fear campaign — well, … Continue reading
Categories
-
Join 499 other subscribers
- Follow Climate of Sophistry on WordPress.com
Recent Comments
- CD Marshall on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism
- CD Marshall on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism
- boomie789 on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism
- Joseph E Postma on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism
- boomie789 on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism
- boomie789 on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism
- Joseph E Postma on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism
- boomie789 on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism
- Joseph E Postma on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism
- CD Marshall on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism
- In different context we hear; “You’re allowed to believe what ever you want!” But for example science isn’t about what people chose to believe, in fact it’s only about what the data shows, raw, unadjusted, real world empirica on No Peer Reviewed Evidence for Climate Science
- In different context we hear; “You’re allowed to believe what ever you want!” But for example science isn’t about what people chose to believe, in fact it’s only about what the data shows, raw, unadjusted, real world empirica on No Peer Reviewed Evidence for Climate Science
- In different context we hear; “You’re allowed to believe what ever you want!” But for example science isn’t about what people chose to believe, in fact it’s only about what the data shows, raw, unadjusted, real world empirica on No Peer Reviewed Evidence for Climate Science
- CD Marshall on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism
- Joseph E Postma on Explaining the Double-Slit Experiment without Probabilism