What happens if science is actually uncorrectable, or becomes uncorrectable? This is the response I get from other scientists who I ask to consider the skeptical arguments which debunk climate alarm: “since we expect climate scientists to trust our own … Continue reading
Categories
-
Join 535 other subscribers
- Follow Climate of Sophistry on WordPress.com
Recent Comments
- donaldgisbey on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on The Infinitesimal Slice – The Lapse Rate is Natural and Necessary without Convection
- donaldgisbey on The Infinitesimal Slice – The Lapse Rate is Natural and Necessary without Convection
- Joseph E Postma on The Infinitesimal Slice – The Lapse Rate is Natural and Necessary without Convection
- Robert Kernodle on The Infinitesimal Slice – The Lapse Rate is Natural and Necessary without Convection
- Alex Janssen on Despite Recent Results There is Still No Greenhouse Effect – Fourier was Right
- Joseph E Postma on Despite Recent Results There is Still No Greenhouse Effect – Fourier was Right
- Alex Janssen on Despite Recent Results There is Still No Greenhouse Effect – Fourier was Right
- Alex Janssen on Despite Recent Results There is Still No Greenhouse Effect – Fourier was Right
- Alex Janssen on Despite Recent Results There is Still No Greenhouse Effect – Fourier was Right
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Alex Janssen on Despite Recent Results There is Still No Greenhouse Effect – Fourier was Right
- Alex Janssen on Despite Recent Results There is Still No Greenhouse Effect – Fourier was Right
- Alex Janssen on Despite Recent Results There is Still No Greenhouse Effect – Fourier was Right
- Joseph E Postma on Despite Recent Results There is Still No Greenhouse Effect – Fourier was Right