In this livestream I will discuss the cosmology of existence. In astrophysics we have the field of cosmology, which is the study of the physical universe at large, including its origins. With ontological cosmology, a field of Illuminism, we go one step higher, to the final level, and examine and research the properties of existence itself, which furnishes the ultimate theory of everything.
And to discuss something controversial, at the end we will also examine LGBT from the Illuminist perspective, so that people can understand why there are different points of view on this subject, and what the correct ontological view would be.
Climate of Sophistry 
Of topic, but I had a lenghty discussion about back radiation. Apparently team flat earth don’t have any experimental examples of back radiation. This seems to shut them up…
By just multiplying series of 1’s with itself it results in a perfect number sequence palindrome. A flowing movement of numbers going up from 1 until the highest number and then going back to 1 again.
Calculator can’t handle it but it works also with number of 1’s greater than 10. It even works with infinity. Infinity 1’s times infinity 1,’s gives a number sequence that goes from 1 orderly up to infinity and from there orderly back to 1
A short cut is drawing a virtual grid and counting the intersections. It beats the calculator
This sequence in relation to the virtual grid is the most simple way to describe thought.
When there is thought it builds a virtual grid up very quick to a completed certain point/number, and then fades away
Frisian dude is picked to perform at the EU song festival.
He can’t sing but is known for mixing music styles. And lets the audience shout “i am god”
Song is not known yet. But here is a style impression
e^(iπ) explained with velocities to positions and time, on a virtual grid
Hello, I recently stumbled onto this blog while looking for any information still available on the whole Pythagorean Illuminati thing that seems to have disappeared over the last few years. Your writing is quite interesting in its own right but I am curious if you could point me in the direction of any available writing from the so called ‘pythagorean illuminists’ or give me your own personal take on it all.
Love to you and many thanks
– Calvert
Hi Calvert,
You can still find Mike Hockney on kobold.com, and that’s really the best and essential source. Be sure to check out my books too, for example:
And yes, the real deal has left. Only imposters and hijackers remain. Stick to the original Hockney and my material. Classic Illuminism group also on FB.
Thank you! I have been studying the work of Nicolas Laos the past few years and now circling back to some materials I had previously dismissed. Now I’ve just got to find the time…
Have you come across Rudolf Steiner?
I know the name and have some books, but haven’t read them yet. Thoughts?
I’ve been interested in Steiner since 1976, when I saw an image of the goetheanum building which he began to design in 1922. I’d say try reading Philosophy of Freedom (more recently translated as “Philosophy of Spiritual Activity”) I personally prefer to change freedom to freehood as that more accurately represents the concept of inner freedom which is what i believe was intended. Also the book Knowledge of Higher Worlds and How it is Achieved which gives a set of excercises designed to promote strength of will, control over the realm of emotion and sharpening of the ability to think.
I’ve been very interested in your input to do with what is being passed off as science and how corruption and debasement of clear thinking has infiltrated and put “feelings” in charge of the drifting will. Noticing very much how when those who have been indoctrinated are questioned they invariably respond as if they were being attacked, rather than wondering if perhaps what they have been subjected to is highly questionable!
My background careerwise is in architectural design, so I have been aware of the false claim that there are greenhouse gases since it was first brought into my realm via building regs. (I think that began to happen in the late 1990’s )
Had further thoughts, I reckon the best translation of Philosophy of Freedom is the one by Michael Wilson in 1964. I hadn’t been aware of this one but found it while looking in the Rudolf Steiner archive.
You can see the whole thing here;
https://rsarchive.org/Books/GA004/English/RSP1964/GA004_c01.html