An Experiment to Demonstrate Ontological Mathematics

In this video I discuss an experiment which will demonstrate that a new interpretational paradigm is required to understand the fundamental nature of reality, which therefore requires Ontological Mathematics to explain. It is an experiment which has been conveniently left out of the scientific discourse, because its likely result would not be conducive to the prevailing Copenhagen Convention of probabilism, paradox, and incomprehensibility of existence.

You can help fund this experiment, and be one of the contributors to solving the spookiness of Quantum Mechanics! Your name will be remembered for the rest of human history when we pull this off! The results of this experiment will usher in Ontological Mathematics and a new era for humanity, and will lead to a Star Trek-like future!

Support:

BTC
1EeURvMjtGUxznP44cM6iSdDAqzjNUJFr8

PayPal
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/joepostma

GiveSendGo
https://www.givesendgo.com/ontologicalmathematics

This entry was posted in Illuminism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to An Experiment to Demonstrate Ontological Mathematics

  1. boomie789 says:

  2. Jopo says:

    A little of O.P but relevant. Stay with me. First I need to explain my understanding of energy transfer via the “photon” / electromagnetic field.

    I really struggle with term photon where it is used as a real tangible item. For me the photon is nothing but a concept to quantify an exchange of energy. The photon does not store the energy but is term used to explain the phenomenon of that transfer of energy. 

    The energy is provided from the electromagnetic field that is set up by the charged moving particle.

    Once a molecule’s electron passes through that electromagnetic field it may well decide to accept that energy and get excited to a higher level. This energy exchange comes from the stored energy in the electromagnetic field from the charged moving particle.

    And conversely the now the excited molecule is considered to be a charged particle and thus it is emitting it’s own electromagnetic field and the process cycles again.

    There certainly is not net gain of energy. Although work is expended in setting up the electromagnetic field.

    So I have no idea what my rant supports. But it is my rant. The photon annoys the sheet out of me. Perhaps the term photon is used to explain an event that has occurred.

  3. CD Marshall says:

    The only paper I found on thin mid-level clouds over the tropics. TMLCs are in reduction, this changes tropical albedo, which increases ocean warming. The paper however cannot explain “why” it is occurring. At least I didn’t see one.

    Ubiquity and impact of thin mid-level clouds in the tropics (nature.com)

  4. MP says:

    Gave your theory some time to gain traction. Since it does does not. How about my theory ?

    Can show actual machines that can perform molecule weight and size measure based on this scientific principle

    Were we fooled by a electrode interference magick trick? where a close camera with opposite field stops the electron flow, and as a result no more scattering?

  5. MP says:

    How to demonstrate electron diffraction in the classroom

    Interesting is that when light hits smaller particles, the scattering angle becomes wider. Electrons are very small particles

    The diffraction pattern of light hitting electrons is round but when pushed through a squared slit it becomes squared

  6. MP says:

    This is a nice setup. It starts with a laser beam, directed at a piece of metal. The photoelectric effect converts the laser light into an electron beam.

    After that diffraction experiments can be done

  7. CD Marshall says:

    Before climate models were politically weaponized what were they actually used for?

  8. donaldgisbey says:


    CD Marshall; This one is still in use,

    http://www.weatheraction.com/pages/pv.asp?p=wact45

  9. CD Marshall says:

    Used for crop predictions makes sense.

  10. CD Marshall says:

    So, this post of mine seems to be drawing blanks from the Climate Cult “experts”.

    Thermodynamics:

    In order to heat a system, you need work or higher energy occupying more quanta at lower wavelengths in greater order than the radiating body. Occupying higher wavelengths with more energy will not change the temperature in a system.

  11. CD Marshall says:

    Or perhaps “will not increase the temperature in a system.” is better.

  12. donaldgisbey says:

    Also The Maria Thun bio-dynamic planting calendar gives the timings, a year in advance, of conditions which will give the highest yields for different crops.
    The Piers Corbyn one would also be useful for any weather dependent activity, like construction.

Leave a comment