I don’t follow Anthony Watts or “Watts Up With That”, and so, I didn’t see this post from WUWT that was posted back in the summer:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/07/19/friday-funny-reflections-on-the-greenhouse-effect
Let’s quote Mr. Watts:
After the essays in May on mirrors and light bulbs, I’ve been regularly poked and prodded via email for not wanting to engage “the slayers” anymore, or to do that “third experiment” I mentioned in May. I long ago concluded by my experiences afterwards with “the slayers” that it is a waste of time and effort to try to explain anything to them. Curt Wilson, who did the second experiment and was planning to do the third, has come to the same conclusion, as have many others.
In regards to the “essays on mirrors and light bulbs”, we demonstrated with Mr. Watts own work that he and Curt Wilson weren’t aware of high-school level math and physics, and that their experiments directly demonstrated that there was no greenhouse effect. See Slaying Watts with Watts and Closing with Watts. Also see Slayers “Putting Up” not “Shutting Up” for what started it all and how Mr. Watts et al. walked right into their own debunk of the greenhouse effect. By the way, I wonder what that “third experiment” was anyway – they were either too embarrassed to continue at their own scientific incompetence, or the experiment didn’t do what they wanted it to, and buried it.
Watts:
WUWT regular, Duke physicist Dr. Robert G. Brown has been trying to talk some sense into them over at Principia Scientific.
Let us deal with this “Dr.” Robert G. Brown for a moment. First of all, this supposed physicist doesn’t understand the basic equations for heat flow, as seen here The Difference between Math and Physics and Greenhouse Fraud 20: Physics disproves the GHE; Steel Greenhouses; & General Electric Lightbulbs. Those posts come directly from attempting to educate this supposed physicist that cold doesn’t heat hot…seriously this fellow has a difficult time with the concept that cold doesn’t heat hot, and he claims to be a physicist. Just wait to see what comes next.
To add to the character & competency self-defamation of this supposed physicist, scanning a few comments down into the WUWT article linked above, we see this quote from Robert Brown:
It takes around 100,000 years for a photon produced in the Sun’s core to get to the surface and escape. Now that’s a greenhouse effect!
The time it takes for “a photon” to get from the core of the sun to the surface of the sun is a function of the mean-free-path a theoretical photon would have to go through to travel that direct distance, given the number of times scattering/absorption/reemission etc. it would have to go through because the density of the solar gas is so thick. This has nothing at all to do with the greenhouse effect. Seriously, Robert Brown’s example intersects the supposed mechanics of the greenhouse effect nowhere. What is Robert Brown trying to say, that there’s a greenhouse effect in the solar atmosphere which creates the high temperature and nuclear fusion at the core?
There is no stellar physics textbook on the planet that talks about or models the greenhouse effect being in stellar (star) atmospheres. The funny thing is, is that it should be, given Robert Brown’s perspective and the general mechanics of the greenhouse effect…but it isn’t. Someone could start up a whole new field of research and get funded for life by proposing research into the greenhouse effect in stellar atmospheres. No one has, and the concept doesn’t exist. (And to be sure, for those who know, line-blanketing is not the greenhouse effect either! Line-blanketing does not increase the temperature of the core, of the fusion reactions in the core – it only slightly modulates [a few percent] the photospheric temperature profile.)
So Robert Brown is either a liar, or he made a very stupid mistake in his claim, and I will take either claim to court if he wants to make a point of my public accusation of him. This is just yet another example of “greenhouse effect by analogy” that the whole concept exists by. There is no direct physics or experiments that actually demonstrate a greenhouse effect – all that exists are analogies, that are actually never physically meaningful, instead of the real thing.
The funny thing is, is that we’ve had the other side ADMIT that their diagrams and analogies are only just that, and that they’re “just used for teaching the concept”. (lol oh really??) Joel Shore has admitted this, Robert Brown has admitted this, Tim Folkerts has admitted this, Roy Spencer has admitted this, and Judith Curry, Jo Nova, Chris Colose, etc etc. When asked for the real thing, it can’t be produced. The Slayers have been looking long and hard for the real thing, for the real physics and math of the GHE instead of just the analogies and simple diagrams, and we’ve even looked in the GCM code the IPCC uses for its predictions…and it just can’t be found. The greenhouse effect only exists in analogies which presuppose their own legitimacy, and otherwise it has no physics or math that actually describes itself proper.
Now that Robert Brown is finished, let’s look at how Anthony Watts continues to put his foot in his mouth and expose himself as a total and complete scientific incompetent and probably even an outright fraud (as he’s done previously); Watts:
For those that might care, keeping the filament of a lightbulb within its optimum temperature range increases its life, by limiting hotspots and thus tungsten evaporation.
How does this relate to the greenhouse effect? Hot-spots are caused by “small variations in resistivity along the filament”, as per Watt’s own link reference. This has nothing to do with backradiation or a greenhouse effect, but Watts tried to make it appear that it did.
Watts:
Putting an incandescent bulb into a reflector housing not designed for it will in fact increase the filament temperature, increasing tungsten evaporation and deposition on the inside bulb glass surface.
Does this statement and reference support the greenhouse effect or backradiation? First, the cited source doesn’t address backradiation anywhere. Second, the reference is about T5-HO lamp behaviour…T5-HO lamps are fluorescents! They don’t have filaments and they don’t suffer from tungsten evaporation. And finally, the overheating in these T5-HO fluorescent lamp designs as discussed in the reference link is caused not by backradiation, but from having other lamps nearby; these are independent sources of energy, and so the heating issue discussed in the reference has nothing to do with backradiation heating in the first place.
Anthony Watts cited a source on fluorescent lamp housing design and pretended that it was supporting his claims on incandescent filaments and had something to do with tungsten evaporation, and that this supported backradiation heating and the greenhouse effect: All of this was a pure deception, and if it wasn’t that, then it was extremely stupid. It was like someone linking to the Wiki on horses to prove that unicorns exist, and hoping no one would catch you. It’s just pure sophistry. None of Watts’ followers even bothered to check the references…they just believed!
Watts:
Tungsten evaporation from hotspots is why standard incandescent bulbs eventually fail.
Again, what do hotspots and tungsten evaporation have to do with the greenhouse effect or backradiation? None of the links support the implication. And the final link here is titled at the actual website, “Why does surface of the incandescent light bulbs become grey over time?”, which is about tungsten deposition on the interior of the bulb. This has nothing to do with the greenhouse effect, yet again. There’s no connection. Watts is just inserting random links and making unrelated statements to make it appear that his beliefs are justified…and this, after his own experiment proved the opposite of what he tried to find. So he’s just obfuscating to try to cover it all up, and move on.
I wonder if Anthony Watts’ and Robert Brown’s lies (or stupidity) here could be brought to court somehow for making fraudulent claims? If we could sue them for making false claims, we could win this case in a minute and make lots of money, and also shut these freaks down, and finally get public traction on destroying the GHE which would happen with the fall of these guys, because it would be so public for the blogosphere of followers. At the very least they would have to retract all of what they said above.
Climate of Sophistry 
Wonder if the third experiment involved measuring the temperature of the filament, rather than the glass?
This was referenced actually in a recent post: https://climateofsophistry.com/2013/10/26/greenhouse-fraud-20/
The part half way down on light bulbs. Existing light bulbs are an ongoing experiment on the GHE, and they show that the filament doesn’t get hotter/brighter when its radiation is trapped. It is perfectly sensible that Watts would try to obfuscate around this with his irrelevant links and references, to pretend the opposite.
That place has changed, man. Mainly, because of you. There’s a few people who have stayed over there constantly like Greg, I go over there and beat em all up at once, about once a month or six weeks or so,
dude – how would you, like to be arguing with Greg, me, you, and who ever else comes around, gets a good lay of the atmospheric energy and chemistry land, and decides to point out the obvious?
Watts has got more readers than anybody on earth, in atmospheric science. After you and Allan Siddons (all rise) caught Spencer with that ludicrous infrared thermometer gaffe,
and then when Watts did that disastrous light bulb thing he did,
the whole tone of the place changed, man. The readers, simply en masse, rebelled, and took over, and started talking about much more sensible science,
and now, Joseph, don’t believe I’m bullshitting ya, but that place is an impregnable fortress against magic gas activism now, comparatively.
You know how, when things started, and till just recently, Watts was still holding out with that magic gas bullshit?
Well first off of course there’s always been Greg,
and there’s a lot of other people who pecked away at it,
and I myself, have gone over there SEVERAL times,
and beat the s*** out of whoever had the biggest mouth till they slunk off for a couple of days to sulk.
And indeed Joseph the very reason I’m here tonight is to link you to a Twerk’s Up With That article about SPIN in CLIMATE.
Theres a couple of astroturfer hicks named Dumb Scientist and Trick who try to get mouthy.
Some OTHER astroturfer, some libtard, comes in posing as a pro tobacco person, and Watts himself, FINALLY, tells the guy to s.t.f.u.
I don’t think Greg is on this one but I went through and just said the kind of stuff your average under educated but concerned citizen will grasp: the “the atmosphere’s a frigid, fluid, bath” thing, coupled with the “you can’t deflect energy to space, yet deliver more energy to surface sensors” thing.
Steven Richard Vada is me.
There’s a whole lot of bull between Genghis and Dumb Scientist which is about as worth reading as a Trenberth CERES report;
but, down toward the end, I just turned on the old drone again and started flybying, over, and over, about how, they have yet to show me, the atmosphere does anything but cool.
Now ya know you’re appreciated Joseph and I’m real sorry I let my Crazy Wrestler persona out here, at your place a bunch of times, I got into the habit of doing it at Topix where I’d argue with astroturfers, and when I’d shut em all up a few days I’d put on this “illucid crazy professional wrestler” character and just talk about everything, under the sun, to lure out some fresh meat.
And when one of them bit, I’d just destroy him and tell the astroturfers, “I did that so I could let my friends see me make you watch it.”
LoL I was mean. But doing that illucid crazy wrestler thing was wrong here and now I’m sorry that I did it.
Anyway, so ever since you busted Spencer AND Watts both, here’s how people can speak about climate, at What’sUpWithTwerk?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/11/06/public-relations-spin-doctors-deliberately-deceived-public-about-global-warming-and-climate-change/#comment-1469987
I guess Dr Tim Ball’s registered with the Slayers? I don’t really know, but in any case Joseph, it’s most certainly the work the guys at S.I. have done that gave people some sensibility about standing up to scamming gate keepers profiteering off alarm.
Sorry I meant registered with P.S.I. not ‘Slayers’ per se, I don’t really keep up with people involved in this beside what I come across incidentally.
Dude, I was thinking about you Slayers, the other day, too – when I went off over there about the dishonesty and gate keeping that’s caused all this loss of money and just plain decency in science and in civilization.
Cheers Joseph.
[I realize I came in late on that one. The wacko tries to start an argument afterward but what I said, got said. And that went through moderation, too.
A lot of mine do.
As far as the setup goes, there’s talk of the sun, one of the posters, comes in and says (about notorious wacko Leif Svalgaard) “Great. I can already hear the Leif Blower spinning up.)
So I kinda go through there and see sure enough, Svalgaard’s Magic Gassing/Insignificant Sun Influencing it, on and on, just like always.
And I figured I’d give em a shot to the chops for the taking up for Magic Gas and trying to destroy people’s reputations, etc.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/10/28/bbc-real-risk-of-a-maunder-minimum-little-ice-age/#comment-1462346
It takes more training in Thermodynamics to get an undergraduate degree in engineering than a PhD in the Faux Science of “Climatology”. This was obvious to me when i attended the Jan 2010 fake debate between Lindzen & North, see “No Loophole for Your Soul”. The only sanctioned debate is between Warmists and Lukes, first noted after the Discover magazine fake Mann & Curry debate, in my article “Non Science Nonsense”. Postma has proven the fake flat disc simplification, which causes an intentional temperature deficit, is false and provided the correct rotating sphere model.
For four years i was a daily Watts reader and commentator. I tried to ignore his constant BULLYING and intellectual deficit. At the time of the defective Watts “light/mirror trick”, Tony got real belligerent, posting only my name and the first few words of a reply….then making some nasty comment and “editing” the rest of my comment. He had previously BANNED THE WORD SLAYER to his auto-delete.
You do not advance science with untrained, agenda driven LIARS. Someone please notify me when this LUKE TOOL is finally forced to have his public MEA CULPA. Again Tony, there is NO BACK RADIATION WARMING anywhere in the Universe.
Great reading Allen…lol…yah your style is interesting but it has always made me smile and laugh. Just don’t get too crazy cause then people think it looks silly. Yes Tim Ball is an original Slayer and co-founder of PSI.
But this post by Anthony was just beyond the pale…I mean he did a pretty good job at either lying or being very stupid about the results of 1) his and Spencer’s challenge to us, 2) his own experiment with light bulbs, but this….linking to random unrelated sources and trying to imply backradiation is valid when the sources are about fluorescent lights and too many of them put in proximity to each other…that’s just outright used-car-salesman shystering. John will link this article over at PSI and I hope a lot more people GET what Watts tried to do, and how much of a fraud the guy is.
Cheers, Slayer! 🙂 (@Faux S.S.)
A couple of email replies from Robert Brown and Anthony Watts:
Brown: “Yawn.”
Watts: “Odd ducks those people.”
That’s it. These guys have been caught right out blatantly lying and making false statements, caught right out, given the material to correct their mistake, and this is their response. What does that tell you about them?
See this is the only tactic they have now, right out of the play-book. They no longer dare to actually attempt (i.e. pretend) to say something scientific sounding, because the only thing that can happen from that is that they will be exposed as frauds and incompetents, because 1) that’s what keeps happening to them with their own words, and because 2) that’s what has to happen if you defend the greenhouse effect since the greenhouse effect is a fraud.
It’s nice having reality on your side.
However, they have stupidity on their side and they know it, and that’s the “strength” they play to. The only thing for them left to do is to be shrewd and to ignore, and hope that this keeps their followers corralled in the safety zone of the numbers of stupid.
We need to figure out a way for bad scientists and bad pretend-science mouthpieces to be responsible for what they lie about, a way for them to have to “pay” for it. But you have to be careful because if you create an institution to do this, it will eventually just be used for maintaining conformity…the alarmists would like nothing more than a way to punish scientists who don’t agree with them. There has to be something we can do to make these liars pay and be shamed for their lies.
Help me figure out a way to publicly ridicule these people and make them have to be responsible and pay for their lies.
I doubt that lying about the “greenhouse effect” is punishable by law in any country.
The hillbilly at the What’sUpWithTwerk thread on ‘Spin Doctors’ actually held out and claims
in public
he’s calculated a refrigerated bath making an object immersed within it,
warmer.
You “don’t follow”, but you make sock puppet comments under a fake name and fake email. Now, who’s the liar Joe?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/11/10/towards-a-theory-of-climate/#comment-1476193
No, I don’t follow. Sometimes someone sends me a thread. Why would I follow you, you don’t understand high school math and physics.
And yes because posting under an alias because you won’t allow real science to be discussed at your climate-alarm-supporting blog is such a big “lie”.
Meanwhile you outright lie about your experimental results on an issue that is fundamental to the entire fraud of climate alarm, because if you actually stated the truth it would undermine the existence of your blog and probably your livelihood and the fraudulent debate of climate alarm and climate science.
This thread outlines specifically how much of a shyster fraud you are. I am sure your ego didn’t let you get away without reading it. Hope you enjoyed it you freaking disgusting mental and moral degenerate.
Anthony Watts says: “…but you make sock puppet comments under a fake name and fake email. Now, who’s the liar Joe?”
==================================================
Anthony, I’ll give you a simple example. We would not call an undercover police agent working with criminals a liar for hiding his identity, would we?
Your site has been supporting the central climate lie (“CO2 induced warming”) for years, including by banning people telling the truth and deleting messages, so it is absolutely understandable that honest people have to hide their identity so that the climate liars who are welcome on your site would not win.
Spot on Greg. Love it.
This just in from Watts via email:
“Ok lets take it up a notch, I’m going to write a complaint to your University”
He can’t win the argument, so he’s going to try screwing with my private life.
I can probably sue him for harassment. Going further, I can publicly expose his lies about his experiment and lightbulb filaments, and his behaviour, and what kind of person he is.
Watts has his self-made bully pulpit….therefore….he MUST BULLY.
If you don’t like the message….kill the messenger….right Tony ?
Pathetic behavior from someone that i had respected for many years….[my bad]
Joseph E Postma says: “This just in from Watts via email: “…. I’m going to write a complaint to your University””
===============================================
This is just unf***ingbelievable.
He’s retracted the threat now…
Joseph E Postma says: “He’s retracted the threat now…”
=================================================
Anyway, it is a bad idea to reveal the identity when talking to climate liars.
Oh now he says he’s tracking my IP addresses so that he can pin-point where I post from…I guess the threat is back on.
Not that it’s a threat. It’ll be great publicity for how he shuts down debate and we have the articles already outlining precisely how this situation arose. PSI will love nothing more than covering this story, should this continue on.
Right, Greg. As we see, they will use all tactics available to cover their crimes. But I think in this case we can turn it right around and use it for making the GHE fraud much more known and discussed, and getting our research out there outlining how the fraud was created etc.
So just to be clear, what happened was that I was having a nice debate and discussion with people on WUWT, then Watts discovered it was me, came in and did his usual abuse and deleting of very relevant comments, and then banned the email address. I then wrote to Anthony by email telling him he was a “sore loser that doesn’t understand high school math and physics” (entire text of email). Then he wrote back accusing me of being “a liar for using an alias to push beliefs”. I wrote back telling that using an alias is not about being a liar, but falsifying experimental results (as has been documented) as he does IS being a liar. Then he wrote back accusing me of harassing him, and said he was going to “write a complaint to my university”. For what, I don’t know, actually. Then I wrote him telling him that going to my work place to try to disrupt my life IS actually legal harassment. Then we haven’t talked since. Anyway just documenting this for people. If I err’d it was in emailing Watts to tell him off for the banning in the middle of a perfectly pleasant conversation with people. Just go here and use your browser to search for “Anomalatys” comments. On the other hand, the “err” could spiral into something much more large that could allow us to get real physics and the fraud of the greenhouse effect out there.
Anthony Watts says:
2013/11/15 at 12:57 PM
You “don’t follow”, but you make sock puppet comments under a fake name and fake email. Now, who’s the liar Joe?
=====
Y.O.U. ARE, WATTS.
You LIED and said there is a GIANT MAGIC MIRROR in the SKY
You LIED and said there is SCIENCE BEHIND THE SCAM.
You LIED and said there is a chance a FRIGID FLUID BATH HEATS the GLOBE.
You’ve
L.I.E.D. so many TIMES your own READERSHIP has to DISREGARD your THREATS against them if they
CALL
the
L.I.E.S. you PUBLISH,
L.I.E.S.
Because IF IT WASN’T FOR YOUR READERS SLAPPING your FAT FACE e.v.e.r.y. DAY with it
YOU’D BURY THE TRUTH and
BE PEDDLING that MAGIC GAiS BULLSHIT F.A.R. and W.I.D.E.
What you had BETTER DO WATTS
is FIGURE OUT HOW YOU BECAME ONE OF THE FALSE MESSENGERS of the GREAT LIGHT
YOU CLAIMED is IN THE SKY
and how EVERY TIME WE ALL CHECK,
you are proven to have been
* * * LYING* * *
you f***g HILLBILLY.
CLAIMING you are a MESSENGER of LIGHT
when ACTUALLY WHERE YOU SAY THERE IS ONE THERE IS ONLY D.A.R.K.N.E.S.S.
and
L.I.E.S
you pedo mustached con man.
Yeah IT’S DEFINITELY ESTABLISHED BEYOND YOU EVER HIDING IT
YOU’RE
a
BALD FACED EVIL LIAR
and GENERAL PURPOSE FALSE PROPHET of a GREAT LIGHT you claim’s there.
You’re the modern SANDUSKY of SCIENCE BLOGGING.
YOu STOP L.Y.I.N.G.
when people FORCE you to stop LYING.
The only reason YOU’VE stopped LYING at the TOP of your VOICE,
TWERK,
is because YOUR READERS TOLD YOU F***K OFF they won’t be TOLD what they have permission to KNOW the TRUTH ABOUT
about your LIES.
About so many things its difficult to count, in fact.
The thing is, you don’t worry about what he says about “he’s tracking you.”
You find out what you’ve got to do to not be tracked and you post there, anyway.
He can’t stop you which is why he’s shitting his pants. He’s got the ethics of a snake.
HE’S A PROFESSIONAL MEDIA MAN he MANIPULATES PEOPLE for a LIVING.
So YEAH Watts SPEAKING of WHO is a LIAR
That’s YOU who set yourself up as a messenger of GREAT LIGHT
but it turns out that EVERY TIME WE CHECK,
you’re ACTUALLY a MESSENGER not only of LITERAL DARKNESS YOU CLAIM’S LIGHT
you’re the messenger of one of one of the GREATEST
MORAL DARKNESS MOVEMENTS in HISTORY.
======
YOUR READERS TELL YOU to YOUR FACE.
I’VE SEEN them DO it.
So DON’T ACT LIKE IT’S WE here who GOT CAUGHT TEACHING THE EARTH OF A GIANT LIGHT
that TURNS OUT to be NOTHING BUT DARKNESS
THAT
ACCOLADE
BELONGS
S.O.L.E.L.Y.
you innumerate, illiterate HILLBILLY
to
YOU.
PUT a POLL up on your site you PEDO-MUSTACHED DOUCHE.
PUT a poll up saying:
MAGIC GAS:
(A) SCAM FROM THE BEGINNING
(B) IT’S REAL, IT’S JUST EVERYBODY DOESN’T UNDERSTAND.
=======
We’ll SEE WHO the SCAMMING LIAR IS ACCORDING to your OWN READERS.
Anthony Watts says:
2013/11/15 at 12:57 PM
You “don’t follow”, but you make sock puppet comments under a fake name and fake email. Now, who’s the liar Joe?
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/11/10/towards-a-theory-of-climate/#comment-1476193
The SORRY
SON of a B*TCH
CAUGHT
TRYING to DAMAGE a MAN’S CAREER
over an ARGUMENT on the INTERNET
=======
In which * * *YOU, WATTS,* * *
* * * Y.O.U, * * *
* * * have been found U.T.T.E.R.L.Y. W.R.O.N.G.* * *
by the VAST MAJORITY of YOUR OWN READERS and the ENTIRE SCIENTIFIC WORLD,
expressing SHOCK
and MORAL OUTRAGE
people POST ANONYMOUSLY
when offsetting
FALSEHOODS you PROPAGATE?
=====
When
YOU’VE BEEN CAUGHT DOING
what you EXPRESS MOCKERY
over people being concerned about
WHAT you’ve BEEN CAUGHT
DOING.
=====
You perverted, evil H.I.C.K.
Your name will go down in the halls of MICHAEL MANN, JAMES HANSEN, KEVIN TRENBERTH, ROY SPENCER, GAVIN SCHMIDT, and KEITH BRIFFA.
You and the GIANT INTELLECTS and WHATS up with TWERK
going on ENDLESSLY about how thuh MAGIC GAiS gonna HEET us AWLL UP yaW!
=====
Over a WARM ROCK
immersed in a FRIGID, REFRIGATED GAS BATH
you sided
with the PEOPLE
in the BIGGEST SCIENCE SCAM
in HUMAN HISTORY
saying you were gonna REVIEW anyone who WROTE
the words SCAM, or FRAUD, or FAKE, or HOAX or MAGIC GAS at your
PSEUDO SCIENCE BIGFOOT/AREA51/MAGIC GAS, site.
=====
HOSTING
ENCOURAGING MOCKERY of THOSE of US TELLING PEOPLE the TRUTH
in MULTIPLE THREADS
ASSASSINATING SHAMELESSLY
PEOPLE’S
CREDIBILITY
who won’t TELL you
THEY THINK
every HEAT SENSOR on a GLOBE
went UP when
IMMERSED in a FRIGID,
phase change REFRIGERATED
GAS BATH.
A FRIGID GAS BATH made EVERY HEAT SENSOR on a PLANET RISE.
After REFLECTING AWAY – INSULATING AWAY – 22% energy in.
YOU have tried to DESTROY MEN’S REPUTATIONS
while YOU ARGUE
that EVERY HEAT SENSOR on a PLANET
showed MORE ENERGY REACHING IT
after SURROUNDING the PLANET and INSULATING it with a FRIGID BATH
that reflects 22% of the energy warming it from EVER REACHING the PLANET.
=====
T.H.I.S.
is what YOUR LEGACY IS,
=====
A.N.T.H.O.N.Y. W.A.T.T.S.
YOU
have been found PERSECUTING INNOCENT MEN
who tried to tell the world a
GIANT REFRIGERATOR CAN NOT SIMULTANEOUSLY BE
A
HEATER.
=====
While YOU YOURSELF DEMONSTRABLY can’t tell HOT from COLD.
You ADMIT: you believe an INSULATING WRAP, made of GAS,
blocking 22% of the energy
of a FIRE
from reaching a ROCK
makes more energy reach that VERY ROCK.
Y.O.U. have B.E.E.N.. too E.V.I.L. to BE ABLE
to HAVE IT REVEALED to * * *Y.O.U.* * *
* * *W.A.T.T.S.* * *
That YOU AREN’T a MESSENGER of LIGHT.
YOU are a MESSENGER of D.A.R.K.N.E.S.S.
where you C.L.A.I.M.
there is L.I.G.H.T.
But:
WE CHECKED, WATTS, and
***YOU’RE***
THE EVIL, PSEUDO-SCIENCE PREACHING,
BALD FACED, EVIL,
LIAR
from the BLACKEST PIT of IGNORANCE
RUN AMOK among the TRUE practitioners of SCIENCE itself:
a DESTROYER
MASQUERADING as “on the side of science” while you have SYSTEMATICALLY
ASSASSINATED INNOCENT MEN’S CAREERS and REPUTATIONS for YEARS
on
END.
=====
I’ve got the respect for you I’ve got for a SNAKE.
One has to PROTECT oneself from Y.O.U. because Y.O.U’ R.E. an ASSASSIN
of MEN’S CHARACTER
YOU Watts are a LIAR a CHARLATAN and a
MAGIC GAiS HOODOO PEDDLER
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
passing for an HONEST MAN.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
If I could make the sound of SPITTING in your FAT pedo-mustache face,
I WOULD.
You’re a DESPICABLE example of what happens when HICKS
invade SCIENCE
and DESTROY H.O.N.E.S.T. MEN’S REPUTATIONS
because
you’ve GOT no CONSCIENCE
you’ve GOT no INTELLECTUAL BONA FIDES
and you know how to
MOTIVATE a MOB.
You’re a MEDIA HACK
a MONKEY with a METER
a MAGIC GAS PEDDLING
* * *PERVERT of SCIENTIFIC TRUTH: * * *
RUINING MEN’S REPUTATIONS because YOU’RE NOT MAN ENOUGH to ADMIT you WERE
and ARE
*W*R*O*N*G*
You bought a story about the “MAGIC GAS REFRIGERATER WHUT MAYDE EVURTHANG INSIDE it DUN GiT HOTTER!”
I hope to read the news of your organs failing before you destroy more of the world’s TRUE and CORRECT THINKING
SCIENTIFIC MEN of YOUR short miserable evil time on this planet.
You have helped ruin DOZENS of careers
Fortunately for me you’ve never had a whiff of who I am, I’ve cleaned scammers like your clocks before. And I’m helping to clean yours Twerk.
People by the HUNDREDS are going to come through here seeing the things you do and have done: and how
TRANSPARENTLY
YOU SELF OWNED, DOING IT HERE today
in THIS THREAD:
MOCKING a man
for TRYING to PROTECT HIMSELF
from your EVIL,
ANTI-SCIENCE,
SYSTEMATIC ATTEMPT at CHARACTER ASSASSINATION
because HE HAD the NERVE to TELL PEOPLE the TRUTH
about a FIELD YOU’RE NOT EVEN DEGREED IN
at ALL.
SYSTEMATICALLY WRECKING people’s CAREERS,
an ILLITERATE, INNUMERATE HICK: who can’t be shown through MATH
and who can’t be shown by ANALOGY or ANY NUMBER of WORDS,
that a FRIGID, REFRIGERATED BATH, you IGNORANT HICK
isn’t a HEATER.
YOU who can not have explained the DIFFERENCE between a FRIGID REFRIGERATED BATH and a HEATER
CAUGHT trying to DESTROY MEN’S CAREERS
because THEY CAUGHT YOU TELLING EVERYBODY
one IS.
Why did you call me an astroturfer hick?
Watts has been swamped by people who don’t believe in the kooky bulls** he helped scam political pseudo-science spread around the world.
He’s always been an evil little grubworm of an intellect and the fact he couldn’t get a degree in electrical engineering but he was able to make it peddling Green House Gas Effect says enough.
I put this up over at his place to reply to the excellent article at the beginning of the thread.
——-
Bill from Nevada says:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
February 6, 2014 at 5:24 am
Remember the people in the days of your life,
who
baited,
insulted,
defamed,
humiliated,
and mocked
honest men
for telling the simple unvarnished
truth.
Remember who they are.
Tell your children who they are.
Call them to you.
Show them how a defeated scammer melts down when caught scamming.
Tell you children about how hundreds of people came forward
pointing out violation of physical law,
after careless violation of physical law.
Tell them how scores of respected scientific professionals
were mocked and derided
because they resisted corrupted, fraudulent, scam pseudo-science.
Remind your children that the world is full
of greasy glad handing good-old-boys,
manic depressive entertainers,
slicksters in suits,
and con men in lab coats.
Tell them not to be naive.
Tell your children the story,
about the people who took over science
peddling the concept cold nitrogen/oxygen bath
made the entire earth warmer
than if there were no cold nitrogen/oxygen bath.
Tell them about the men who are responsible for their being taught that
“placing reflective gas between light from a fire – the sun,
and a sphere – the earth,
makes planetary heat sensors show
more energy
arriving on the surface of the earth,
than when there was 20%
more energy
arriving on the surface of the earth.
—————————-
Tolstoy:
“I know that most men,
including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity,
can seldom accept
even the simplest
and most obvious truth
if it be such as would oblige them
to admit the falsity of conclusions
which they delighted in explaining to colleagues,
which they have proudly taught to others,
and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives.”
Oh yeah: I almost forgot. Go over and make some posts guys, the good it does will be part of your own legacy in fighting bulshooting fakes.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/02/05/fighting-the-wrong-battle-public-persuaded-about-co2-as-pollutant-not-as-cause-of-warming/#comment-1560043
Folks, just because thesre is a difference of opinion, it doesn’t give you license to label someone a “Liar”.
It’s not a difference of opinion Smokey. Watts and Brown etc either really are liars, or they’re extremely incompetent, or both. Ontological physics is not a matter of opinion, and Watts and Brown and Spencer etc aren’t allied with it. That’s a fact. They can’t do basic math.