Ontological Mathematics & the T.O.E. Part 1c: When Did Existence Occur?

Did existence come into being at some point, or has it always existed? Did thought come before movement, or movement before thought?

This entry was posted in Illuminism and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Ontological Mathematics & the T.O.E. Part 1c: When Did Existence Occur?

  1. It’s all fun! Thanks for another piquant lesson.

  2. MP says:

    Is The Wave Function The Building Block of Reality?

  3. Yes it is. Will discuss soon.

  4. CD Marshall says:

    Are you going to submit a paper on this at some point?

  5. MP says:

    Was The Universe Born From Nothing?

    The docu explores the possibility of the universe being a temporarily fluctuation of a vacuum

  6. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    According to the Gödelian Incompleteness Theorem, the universe is complete (ie: the set of theorems describing the system doesn’t depend upon external inputs), which implies that these monads must exist within our universe.

    Can we detect them? Is this monad you speak of just the wavefunction of the primordial universe?

    I’m attempting to reconcile this philosophical / metaphysical approach so my clockwork mechanistic brain can grasp it… can one say that the circling of the monads (a movement) was transformed to translational movement which separated positive and negative potentials, allowing something to exist within net nothing? Would that be an accurate assessment?

    If so, what caused that transform of circular monadal movement into translational movement which separated positive and negative potentials such that something could exist within net nothing?

  7. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    Matt Drudge (Drudge Report), Andy Katz-Mayfield and Jeff Raider (Harry’s Razors (and Warby Parker for Jeff Raider)) and now Gabriel Weinberg (DuckDuckGo)… all swerved leftward in a short period of time.

    What makes them abandon their principles with such haste? Blackmail? Payoff? Too weak to stand up to feeble woketard pressure?

    It’s like moths to a flame, they can’t seem to help themselves, they develop some compulsion to go woke, knowing full well it’s highly likely they’ll go broke shortly afterward. Don’t they know that the woketards pressure them to go leftward knowing full well it’ll destroy their business, that that’s their intent? Why give in to that? And why double down on that particular brand of stupid when your business starts collapsing around you?

    I’ll admit, I don’t understand people very well, but this is especially incomprehensible.

    I now read the Noah Report, use Brave search and use Jeremy’s Razors (at least, I will once they’re delivered… projected shipping date 15 Jul 2022), rather than Drudge Report, DDG and Harry’s Razors.

    From my “People and Companies to Avoid” list:

    DDG purport not to censor, but the CEO tweeted that they would be “downranking” Russian sites which didn’t fit DuckDuckGo’s definition of “credibility”… they’re going Drudge. They’re setting it up so they can censor just like Google, removing the sole difference between them and Google, all while setting the terms of their censorship so that they are the arbiters of “truth”. It is only a matter of time before they have mission creep, and soon enough they’ll be censoring just like Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc. (10 Mar 2022)

    A white male programmer with 12 years of programming experience applied to work at DuckDuckGo… he was immediately rejected. As a test, he applied for the same job as a black female who could not program or even spell simple words properly (he intentionally misspelled simple words in his application and resume)… he was immediately moved to the second round of hiring. (10 Mar 2022)

    They also lowered the page rank of realclimatescience.com for the search term “realclimatescience”, putting in place leftist woketard sites. (11 Mar 2022)

    Well, that escalated quickly… 5 weeks. DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg announced that the search engine will begin purging all independent media outlets from the DDG platform and will replace them with “trusted” mainstream media outlets instead. (16 Apr 2022)

  8. Richard says:

    You believe in the big bang and also in black holes. You cannot prove there was a.big bang and this means your ontological mathematics is not true because of its dependence on it, you state existence is forever and our universe began with the big bang.
    You should not believe everything the teach you at school, especially not that black stuff.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s