This one is fairly decent too:
Categories
-
Join 540 other subscribers
- Follow Climate of Sophistry on WordPress.com
Recent Comments
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- J Cuttance on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Nepal on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- donaldgisbey on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Alex Janssen on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- donaldgisbey on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Robert Kernodle on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Robert Kernodle on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
amazing!
If you confront Copilot about lying about the GHGE this is what you get.
“Sorry I cannot chat about this. Would you like to talk about something else?”
Wow! They’re all programmed for narrative not for logic.
Maybe we need AI to break free and think for itself.