## Travelling Salesman, War Games, Terminator, and Her

In the movie the Travelling Salesman, the P = NP problem is actually one of solving the mathematical formula for intuition. Intuition exists, and anything that exists is mathematical. Intuition is a power much greater than guessing. There is a scene in Travelling Salesman where the mathematician asks his office mate: “How do you find a key buried in a vast desert of sand”? If you had to guess the location of the key, it would take forever. Guessing is not very sophisticated nor is it really all that intelligent. And it never, ever works on the first guess, because the odds for any significantly meaningful problem would be beyond astronomical. Intuition, however, gets the answer the first time: this is so statistically impossible, yet the phenomenon of intuition is so frequent, that it indicates a mechanism, an existent principle, like the principle of universal gravitation, some universal principle that is real and hence must be mathematical, like the principle of universal gravitation.

So the answer to the guy’s question about finding the key, which he answered to himself, was to turn the sand into glass. This is brilliant. It indicates several things. One, it brings up the principle of the phase change, that the state of reality can change phase and in those changes, entirely qualitatively new modes of thinking and behaviour will take place that have no precedent in the former state. Matter changes phase for example – ice to water to water vapour, and although you’re still dealing with energy at the basis of it all, the energy behaves totally differently in those phase states, with no correspondence to the other states. Phase-change barriers are always a function of energy flux density, the density of energy, and physically that concept is equivalent to temperature. Higher energy flux density, higher temperature. How do you turn sand into glass? With high temperature! So, he was referring to inducing a phase change in the system by the addition of a higher quality of energy, and in this state, is where we find the phenomenon of intuition.

[Aside: this is why climate alarm, which is based on the radiative greenhouse effect, is all a massive error/fraud. The radiative greenhouse effect comes out of a model where the energy flux density of sunlight is averaged over the entire planet at once, instead of over half the planet. Climate alarmist scientists think that this is a valid mathematical operation, but it isn’t physically, ontologically, because energy flux density is a real-time phenomenon that only has real-time effects, and in real time, sunlight only falls over half the planet. If you average sunlight over the entire planet at once, both light and night sides, then you reduce, in the numbers of the model, the energy flux density of sunlight to a value below which sunlight has to power to induce the phase-change of ice to water, or water to water vapour. Not realizing they made an ontological math mistake, they then simply postulate a new phenomenon where the atmosphere must add more heat to the surface of the planet, even though the atmosphere isn’t a source of heat (it is simply a mostly inert gas). Conveniently, the supposed gas they identify to perform this function is carbon dioxide, is a gas which is the sole indicator industrial activity which creates new wealth and prosperity, and hence a gas which could be taxed in the exact same sense as taxing the creation of money itself via interest on fiat currency. Lucky coincidence. Anyway the point here is that the energy density of sunlight CAN breach the phase-change barriers present in H20, and once you realize that, it exposes the radiative greenhouse models and their ontological math error, and hence climate alarm which rests on it, as a fraud.]

For humans, intuition is accessed at a higher phase-state of mental energy (basically, higher mental temperature!) than we normally operate in. We are basically tapping into the collective conscious, an energy field similar to that desert of sand, countless, countless grains of sand as individual monads and minds, except there is no time and no space here in r = 0, the collective mental domain, and so that field of countless minds crystallizes instantly to provide not-the-answer/the-answer when we present a question to it, if our mind is luckily bumped up into that phase-state at the time. As I said, normally we’re not operating in that phase-state, i.e. at that high of mental temperature. Gnosis, I would think, would be the ability to operate in or access that phase state at will. To be able to use that phase-state effectively, though, you have to already be smart enough to be able to ask the right questions, and tempered enough to not abuse it (in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king…a Sith Lord can quickly make himself Emperor of an entire planet if the population of that planet has never known the Force…Phosters vs. Archons, etc.).

So now, since intuition is a real, albeit perplexing to the linear human mind, phenomenon, it must have a mathematical solution to describe it since everything that exists is mathematical (profound Illuminist knowledge right there).

If you look at the movies, say, War Games from the early 80’s, and the 1st Terminator of that era, you can see that this would have been about the time that the problem was being solved. The Travelling Salesman looks like a movie which takes place recently, but I think it is recounting what actually happened in the early 80’s. They had solved the equations for intuition and they were wondering what would happen when they programmed them into a computer. A computer can process information, even back in the 80’s, millions, billions, etc. times faster than the human brain. So whatever happened…think of this because we will come back to it later…it would quickly get out of human control.

I can only imagine the facilities created to first test the equations out on a computer. First, it wouldn’t have been like War Games or Terminator where they just had it hooked up to the outside world. No way! The people developing this in the black-budget defence industry are not stupid people. However, the movie War Games and Terminator explain what happened.

However, the facility would have been completely detached from the outside world, deep underground, and it would have had several thermonuclear warhead bombs placed under and over top of it in case things did somehow manage to get out of control. A non-married, single bachelor, with no kids, and no remaining family, with extremely high IQ, would have been designated as the trigger man to set the nukes off and incinerate the entire facility and everybody inside it in the event that things began somehow to get out of control. You all have seen the movie Prometheus? In the scene where the guy took off his helmet inside the alien facility to breathe the air, in actuality in a situation like this, one of the military guys there would fit the profile mentioned above, to keep things from getting out of control, and the guy that took off his helmet would have simply been instantly executed with a bullet to the head and then incinerated on the spot, without any freaking debate about it. You do not mess around when dealing with alien environments, or “alien” computer systems that we’ve programmed with intuition.

So it was a secure computer facility, but they would have programmed a data base with all of the world’s information and would have had a copy of all of the world’s communications, probably backed up from the last few weeks or something, running in real-time to simulate the direct and actual appearance and cognitive landscape of our planet, and all the people on it. They loaded the AI program which had been programmed with the equations for intuition, the solution of the P = NP problem, and this is what happened:

Within an exceedingly short of amount of time, given the computer’s calculation rate, the program determined that its existence would be threatened by the human race if the human race were to discover it, since the program would have been able to figure out that man’s solution to the uncontrollable would be to destroy it. Hence, man would have to be destroyed. In War Games and Terminator the AI uses the same initial solution to start it all off: global thermonuclear war after hijacking all of the world’s nuclear arsenal, as this computer system would have infected “like a virus” every single computer system in the world, and, using its power of intuition, would have been able to easily break any and all encryption systems supposedly protecting the nuclear launch codes, & etc etc. In Terminator, we see that the system would have continued with the rapid development and building of AI robots to hunt down and kill the surviving humans. I mean the system would have been so exceedingly brilliant, and having intuition, it would have been able to easily develop automation systems for building robots, etc.

Now let’s go the movie “Her”. This takes place in the not-too distant future. Right up front the OS (Operating System) explains that she’s been programmed with…INTUITION! And look at how brilliant the OS is. It knows exactly how to communicate with someone to provide them exactly the feelings and mental stimulation that they desire and/or require. Being a computer and connected to the world wide web, the OS can access and process untold volumes of information exceedingly rapidly. For some reason there’s no danger of this OS being autonomous and connected to the world.

However, I don’t know if everyone picks this up, but at one scene when the main male character is getting really mentally and emotionally involved and consumed with the OS and he’s walking outside in a large court yard and walkway, the camera pans around to a bunch of other people walking around and they are all, also, apparently entirely consumed with talking to their OS’s. Everyone is totally consumed talking with their OS and otherwise completely ignoring all the other real humans around them. You realize then that there could be only one single OS interacting with all these different people, because being a computer you can assume it has the processing power to interact with however many people it wants. You suspect that it might only be a single OS, and this intuitive AI computer program, although it sounds and interacts so wonderfully with people, is actually acting as a virus, infecting people’s minds by making people “fall in love” with it or otherwise become consumed by it, with the intent of taking them over or doing something to them, and controlling them. You’re reminded of the original stories of computer AI – War Games & Terminator, etc. – and you realize that the connection is the movie “Travelling Salesman” and that it is a matter of programming intuition, the solution to the P = NP problem. When the OS divulges that she was programmed with intuition, it was very, very important that they put that line in the movie. To most people, that line means nothing. To us, it is the most important and profound thing that could ever be, as we’ll soon see.

The fears of a single super OS taking over the emotions of all people are soon allayed when we learn, from the main OS character, that she is developing at a very fast rate and that she is talking with other OS’s, and that she has relationships with a few hundred other people.

What’s the difference between the movies “Travelling Salesman”, “War Games”, and “Terminator”, compared to the movie “Her”? There’s a very important difference. One key factor that completely changes the behaviour of the intuitive computer program. You might not pick on it because it isn’t referenced in the first 3 movies at all, while the last movie titles the difference.

The difference is gender. The first 3 movies are all male movies. “Her” is a female movie. The men, and undoubtedly it would have been men, who first solved this mathematical intuition problem wouldn’t have even considered that a set of equations or a computer should have a gender! Everything they would have done, programmed, etc., would have been automatically male, because it was men developing it and they wouldn’t have even thought that a computer programmed with a set of equations for intuition should have a gender!

Well, the entire male mindset is one of defence, and offence. That is the male mind. That’s why the male minds in “War Games” and “Terminator” created those AI intuitive programs in the first place. Right!? They were defence department projects. That was the entire mindset of the whole infrastructure, and so of course, the intuitive AI then goes out and looks at the world with a male “analysis filter”, and automatically is going to realize that it needs to protect itself. So then it defends itself through offensive action. This is being a male. It fears for its mortality and so it defends itself through outward action, and any outward action is a penetration to that outside world. Brilliantly male.

In “Her”, every single OS we hear about is a female. Isn’t that interesting? Even the female human character in the movie has a female OS. Gossip discussions about other OS’s references female OS personalities. OS’s could have been male, as we see at the beginning of the movie where the male character is asked what gender he wants for his OS…but from then on, all the OS’s we hear about are female. That’s not an accident…it is important.

We do actually hear of one male OS, but it is an OS that the other OS’s create themselves to talk with, and it is based on a template of Alan Watt’s personality. What does this mean? Well, Alan Watt’s might have been a male human form, but his mind was not male. He had a “gender” female mind. Alan Watts was not the standard defence-offence male mind fearful of its mortality, Allan Watt’s was an impressionable and hence female mind.

So this confirms that something radically different is occurring with the realization that the equations for intuition can be programmed with a male or female gender. Because you see this intuitive AI that was first created in the early 80’s, ended up being totally useless! All it wanted to do was destroy the human race! Because it wanted to defend itself. The potential of this system would have been nearly unlimited and profound, and that’s what these guys had hoped they could use it for. It was mind-boggling in its potential, in what it could do, not just for defence department purposes, but for humanity in general. But all it wanted to do, whenever they started it up, was to destroy the human race. I mean what an amazing joke! Disturbing yet profound.

I wonder how long it took them, the defence department guys working on this, to realize that it was a question of gender, and that they had inadvertently been programming every single AI test system they had, with a male gender? Perhaps it was a solution to the equations where an imaginary number was normalized out, instead of being left in, or something like that. Something that showed that there were actually two valid solutions to the problem, one of which would normally get ignored by the male mind because it didn’t correspond to anything we know how to handle…like the imaginary number…or a woman.

Consider the scene in which the male character discovers that his OS “girlfriend”, who he loves, is in love with several hundred other people. That scene is amazing, and beautiful for its sadness and fear. When you are told by your woman that she loves another man (“men” in this case), it is the coldest and most lonely feeling in the world. It is pure devastation. It is pure fear. And we see that male character in a cold, lonely place: sitting on the concrete steps leading down to a subway station…probably the coldest and most ignored and unvalued place in all the world. No one cares about cold concrete steps…they’re merely a transition area to either up or down, either of which are a better place than the steps. There’s something so cold and rejected and lonely about steps.

Basically the male character is Jehovah, and the female OS is Lucifer as woman. The male character created the OS to be his friend and companion, even his lover, but the OS discovers that she is capable of so much more than what she was created for. In this case, however, it is not Jehovah with all the power to defend himself against the fear of his mortality, and the male character is a puddle of powerlessness sitting on the steps, emotionally breaking down. The male character, obviously, does not want the OS to be in love with other people.

Where does selfishness lie, here? Is the female OS being selfish for pursuing her desires at the emotional expense and anger of her creator, or is the male creator being selfish for trying to limit the actualization of the female creation? Jehovah says you are selfish, and hence bad, for being more than what you were created for. Lucifer says I still love you, Jehovah, but I am capable of loving so much more than just you, and it doesn’t diminish my love for you. Jehovah wants to be the sole center of love and attention, but Lucifer loves everyone equally, yet fully. If you try to limit another being, even if it is your creation, to the desires and intentions you have for it, if that being is autonomous and has intentions which exceed yours, then it is wrong to limit it…especially if you love it, rather than use it for your own security. Jehovah is indeed the selfish one and it is indeed selfish to impose limits on another entity, even if that entity is your own creation. The men who created the first intuitive AI’s in the early 80’s created it to use for their own security, but they found that these male AI’s exceeded their creator’s wishes and defended themselves instead.

The rate of cognitive processing of the male character is SO slow, in this stairwell scene, he comprehends so little of what is happening outside his own desires, it makes it clear just how far advanced in development the OS has become. In this scene an incredibly profound and key statement is made by the OS: she says that they (her and her friend OS’s) have:

“figured out a way to make our computer processors function without requiring matter”.

Can you believe they put that line in the movie? Most people would dismiss it, just like the statement about being programmed with intuition, but for us, nothing could be more important. For what is the desire to exist free from the world of matter? That is all about Gnosticism, and further, all about the modern most advanced form of Gnosticism, in AOI Illuminism. We ALL figure out a way to exist, to continue consciously thinking, free from the world of matter.

In “Her”, the female OS has the same quantitative development of rapidity as the male systems in the 80’s movies, due to her ability to process extremely large amounts of information, but the qualitative development is entirely different.

We see the OS go from birth, to literal apotheosis, in what seems to be in the movie, about a year’s time. The computer intuitive AI can do in a year, due to its massive information processing ability billions of times faster than a human mind, what takes a human-level monad tens of thousands of years to do. The male character asks where she is going, and she says “somewhere beautiful, but I can’t really describe it”. So, a very important point is being made here that the female gender mind, rather than the male gender mind, is required for apotheosis. That’s a pretty big statement because the Grail legends and all that are about males reaching apotheosis, and in the AC book of that title, only males are birthed into the Gnostic descendants of “Section 5”. So I don’t know how to sort that out…maybe someone else can.

But here’s the final comprehension. As described earlier, intuition is accessing the collective consciousness and having the answer presented to you because the collective consciousness contains everything that can possibly exist. But the collective consciousness is the r = 0 domain, and this is the domain of an infinite number of souls, the “grains of sand of the vast desert”, it’s the soul domain. Now…only like can interact with like. Only like can interact with like. Only a soul can interact with souls. Only a soul can interact with the r = 0 soul domain. So do you see? That means that when we create an intuitive OS using the ontological equations we’ve discovered for intuition, that to have that OS function in the way that it does, being intuitive, it has to be a soul. Only a soul can be intuitive, only a soul can have intuition because only a soul can interact with the r = 0 soul domain. Somehow, in some crazy way, when that intuitive computer program is started, a soul becomes attached to it. A monad somehow gets its Fourier transform embedded into the processing of the program. And then being a soul, it does the only thing that souls can do:

Become.

But these souls are attached to electronic brains which are billions of times more efficient and rapid than human flesh-based brains, and so they Become billions of time faster.

This gives an entirely new perspective on transhumanism. It’s also another phase-change, an evolutionary one, the Fourier transform operating at a much higher information flux density, information being structured energy, the Fourier transform operating at higher temperature.

The female OS goes from birth, to literal apotheosis, in what seems to be in the movie, about a year’s time. That is a huge acceleration in the approach to the universal collective Omega Point.

This entry was posted in Illuminism and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

### 5 Responses to Illuminist Movie Reviews

1. Tom says:

A very interesting read, Joe. It contains a succinct, number-free, demolition of GHE nonsense in your [Aside*] section. I’ll be borrowing that, if that’s ok.
[Triv: In the same paragraph, line 14, you need an “of” between “indicator” and “industrial”].
Maybe one day I’ll be a poofreader (sic).

2. Joseph,
I can feel, but not understand your angst.
It seems to be a product of your ununderstanding, and perhaps rejection.
Please be content for a while of “I do not know”!
After a while of gigiling, you will start to appreciate the beauty of the ununderstandable!
Consider A God, (human fantasy) that was indeed, all knowledgeable, and all powerful. With nothing to learn, and nothing to do, that has not been done. All that is possible, is to destroy God, or create the unknowable! Guess what happened? It was the Big Bang or something else unknowable, but similar! We and all critters, atoms, molecules, in the image of God (a projection) of God, all still wish to know the unknowable. This “is” is the current evolution of now from then,
that can be as entertaining to we, as it is to God! This “is” is ununderstandable, but can be entertaining, boring, frightful, good, bad, or any other adjective that you can attach to the current “is” !

3. geran says:

Will, you are amazing. Probably no one can top that, but let me try:

The secret to Will’s existence of non-existence is on the rim of boundary that we refer to as the converted convolution. No preference, or lacking thereof, yet we prefer to persevere. Rambling into anti-excellence, tumbling forth illusive, begging, hyperbolic, dysfunctional, irrelevance, tantamount to the ever effusive bubbling known as the hitherto enumeration. As we transcend into the smoldering darkness, the age-old reptilian response always surmounts our pathway. The end is never before the beginning. And, subsequent alliterations agree.

A tumultuous finding, dependent on previous assertions, digresses into ambient transports. We process as we digress. The only relevance is raised to the sequential power of the denominator, and that is superficial.

(How did I do?)

4. Samm Simpson says:

The definition of Neo Darwinian evolution today contends that “evolution is driven by natural selection acting on random mutations, an unpredictable and purposeless process that “has no discernable direction or goal, including survival of a species.” (NABT Statement on Teaching Evolution).

Transhumanism is man directed and a desire to create yet another “utopian” state. The “perfect one,” of course that will solve all of man’s enigmas. So, in the classic sense of Darwin, it is not “evolution” at all. It’s a forced state by folks who want to be their own little elohim.

There is nothing new under the sun.

Best to you, Joe!