This is something that I have thought about for many, many years on this issue. I never said a word about it at all because at the time, in the thick of it in the now-won argument over the non-existence of the radiative greenhouse effect of climate alarm, it would have just increased the parameter space way too much and allowed for more of the side-distraction sophistry that the disgusting idiot climate alarmist sophist freaks just love for generating their cross-bred weeds of distortion. The focus had to remain solely upon debunking the now-known-to-be-mentally-retarded radiative greenhouse effect. And now that that is done, I would like to draw you to a comment by RK from the previous post:
RK: I came across this:
From the epilogue of that paper:
The author would like to motivate experimental scientists to duplicate these experiments on the same, or preferably on a larger scale. At the same time, theoretical scientists are
also challenged to develop a theory explaining these findings.
If this will allow mankind to use, as Loschmidt foresaw,
“… an inexhaustible resource of convertible heat at all times…”, …only future will tell.
And my response to RK’s comment summarizes the aforementioned thoughts I have had about this possibility:
Is that what all this sophistry and the RGHE is trying to hide? A mechanism to generate unlimited free energy?
So instead of us discovering free energy and the liberation therein, they – the disgusting idiot goblins of the other spiritual faction – wanted us to feel bad about our existence and to be taxed for our breathing under this pseudoscience sophistry of the RGHE which nicely covers the real liberating mechanism up with a simulacrum. Imagine if this is the extent to which this debate revolved?
Is it not one of the strangest phenomena in human history this hysteria over “climate change”, where the very people who are hysterical about it cannot even use the term “climate change” in a logical and rational and meaningful manner in language, where one encounters so much of pseudoscience and sophistry that should never have made it into mainstream scientific discourse but yet did and became the star jewel of the relevance of modern science to man in a technological age? Nothing about this has been rational nor has made any sense…it has been pure hysterical emotion combined with sophistry, pseudoscience, and simulacrum from the start.
Something else has been going on, something generated by something sick, demented and perverted, and incredibly, shockingly stupid. The taxation of carbon dioxide, the life molecule, and then the fighting of the weather with those funds (among other disgusting things that they’re really doing with that money)…on the very face of it you know that you’re looking at something quite sick, demented, unsalvageable, and dark and retarded.
WHO or WHAT in the “f” came up with this idiocy!? LOL
Anyway…that would be a discontinuous step-function in the mode of existence of man, would it not? There would be a before and an after, and it would be the only before and after that ever really mattered to man. Gravity has seemed to remain the strangest of the forces.
One can only imagine the possibilities, and that’s great to do just for its own sake.
I am not at all certain about all this and that is also the reason I never wanted to get into it, but at this point it is definitely fine to give this post as speculation and imagination. I don’t know, and I cannot say one way or the other.
BTW, you following Q?
“The World is about to change.