Meritocratic Power to the People from Illuminism & Propertarianism

Propertarianism is how you give the power to the people.

This isn’t the “muh power to the poeple!!” like we have experienced with communism and socialism and predatory capitalism which is merely absolute power to the dictator/corporations and slavery and death for everyone else; this isn’t the power for power’s sake and the power to rule only if you are the perfect political sociopath and psychopath and parasite.

No, this is the power of TRUTH, the power of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, the power of Reason, the power of real science and not fake pseudoscience, given to every individual to rule with.

By establishing the basis of the rule of law through the entirely rational definition of Reciprocity and Property in-toto, by having to justify why something should be one way and not another in the light of how it actually tangibly scientifically affects somebody and society, the Principle of Sufficient Reason is thus CENTRALIZED as the core pillar of society and the nation’s psyche as a whole.

This is the power of truth to the people, for the people to rule with. This is an entire phase-space change in the psyche of man and of the society which adopts this. A phase change. This is currently the latent phase boundary where nothing is changing although lots and lots of more energy is building up inside. Eventually, the boundary is broken and the entire state of matter/mind/etc. changes to an entirely new and higher-order phase regime of physics where an entirely new set of rules now applies.

In this case the phase change marks a drastic reduction in entropy and disorder, a massive stoppage of the leaks of corruption, a brand new ultra-frictionless lubricant for the gears of law and societal interaction, a super-refined fuel for the rockets of the mind.

Propertarianism FAQs – How to Punish Parasites FOR PROFIT (and more…)

Gallery | This entry was posted in Illuminism and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Meritocratic Power to the People from Illuminism & Propertarianism

  1. I’ve been having a good think about how to actively achieve this without violent revolution. My biggest concern with John Marks and Curt Doolittle is their apparent fatalism in a coming Civil War (Societal war across the Western World?) They talk about separation and segregation from the Left, but seen out of ideas when it comes to actually getting to such a point peacefully.
    Looking at history, the US war of independence only succeeded because the Colonists had already implemented the society they wanted BEFORE the rebellion. So that the Declaration of Independence simply affirmed the society they wished to defend, not that which they wished to create from scratch. It was King George and the English Parliament’s attempt to increase control, not keep the Status Quo that sparked the rebellion.

    So the question becomes, how can we increase reciprocity and reduce lies and parasitism NOW?

    My thoughts are that we must first utilise the concept of energy density and higher flux in our battle for civilisation. At the moment we are spread thinly all over the globe and our energy is being ever further diluted by immigration and consensus democracy. Imagine if every Slayer and every Propertarian lived in one city or State. Imagine what laws would be passed to reduce parasitism and hold liars to account.

    Is this practical? Obviously not completely. Neither you or I is willing to simply up and move Continents. But focus IS the key. Truth density like energy denisty is the key to greater power. So identifying or creating pockets of control and places of concentrated Truth and accountability is key. Identifying where we currently have most of it and focusing political activism within the current system to get more of it, makes more sense than just turning everyone into doomsday preppers. To begin with we each start where we are. But which enclaves of Truth and freedom will flourish and atttact more people of honesty, I wonder? Now that we know what to defend against, immigration of people willing to defend against it, will become easier to select for and attract.

  2. Wicked,

    I like your phrase, “truth density”.

    At the moment, with regard to climate knowledge, we have “falsehood density” in major loci of power, such as US Congress, NASA, NOAA, major educational institutions, major elite science journals, major science organizations, and major international governing bodies (IPCC).

    The problem is that masses of divergent integrity are trying to co-exist on the same continent, unlike the US and England, before the Declaration of Independence, where a whole ocean physically separated the disagreeing masses.

    What we have now are small pockets of “truth density” that look like specs in the larger mass of falsehood.

  3. Christopher Marshall says:

    Doesn’t history prove that any government given too much power even with the best of intentions by it’s very nature of that power in turn will ultimately become corrupt? Look at the idea of the United States in the beginning pilgrims and Native Indians lived peacefully with each other and benefited each other in free trade. The intentions of the foundations of the U.S. was a nation for the people all property was to be owned by the people and for the people. The original intent was for the federal government to be an entity protecting our sovereign nation but as a general rule never interfering with the mundane day to day life of liberty and the pursuit of happiness without a reason. Look at it now.

    The Federal Formula:
    Good Intentions + Time= Corruption.
    Corruption + Time= Socialism.
    Socialism + Time= Communism.
    Communism + Time= Totalitarianism.
    Totalitarianism + Time= Civil War.
    Rinse & Repeat.

    The Free Market Formula:
    Good Intentions + Time= Small Business.
    Small Business + Time= Company.
    Company + Time= Corporation
    Corporation+ Time= Board.
    Board + Time= Corruption
    (The Board removes the original founder and steals the business for themselves.)

    Is this assessment cynical? Yes? Is it plausible? Very much so. Any entity (in my opinion) that becomes so large that it loses it’s identity will eventually become ambiguous in it’s morality. Look what happened to Eon Musk (a poor example perhaps) but he was booted from his own company if I’m not mistaken? Or did he keep it in the end?

  4. From a broader perspective:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s