How The US Temperature Record Is Being Altered Part 3

This entry was posted in Fraud of the Greenhouse Effect and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

158 Responses to How The US Temperature Record Is Being Altered Part 3

  1. Fraud is systemic

  2. boomie789 says:

    You yelling “they just lie!” from your AMS video popped in my head. lol.


  3. CD Marshall says:

    BOOMIE great job with that video!

    I think you did very well, you caught yourself and deescalated. Perfectly understandable since the ones you mostly deal with are smart enough/educated enough to know they aren’t telling the truth.

    Learning public speaking is important to winning minds over and yes, a bit demeaning for a physicist, but necessary. Most of the population will never understand you, “full on physicist” myself included.

    It is easier to teach someone right who has never been taught wrong than it is to teach someone who has been wrong or even convince them they are wrong.

    Public opinion is fickle and can change like the wind. Patience is crucial, like speaking to your daughter but not sounding condescending. Most of the world is ignorant on real physics these days and you have to treat them like a child mind.

    Trolls are dishonest or zealots and either way, a waste of time. However, dealing the right way with a troll may persuade an honest person who is still asking the right questions.

    I try and not go on the offensive first unless they have already displayed the aggressive behavior.

    I admit its hard, the constant lies and vile spirits of these trolls and the seeming endless algorithm of obfuscation is enough to wear down the most brilliant mind. Everyone needs a reset, or a safe place for the mind to go to find balance and sustain emotion under logic.

    If you are not smart enough to ask the question, “why?” odds are you won’t ever learn the answer to, “why not”.

  4. boomie789 says:

    Talking with the fellow you debated with. I told him

    “Sounds like you’re still not convinced”

    His reply

    “I’m not, you can’t balance the radiation budget of the surface without that input to the surface from the atmosphere”

    It all went in one ear and out the other. BUT, overall I got more converts then dissenters.

  5. Aggravatingly amazing idiots.

    One of the things I stated: a simple energy budget is incomplete in terms of physics, because it treats all energy as heat. Secondly, it’s not even a model of anything that actually physically exists anyway – there is no energy balance at the surface ever given that surface temperature is continuously changing, and this is why one needs to go to heat flows and physical processes being driven in real time.

    Convenient for him to just ignore the model I posted in that convo.

  6. The only scenario that the simple energy budget works is for outside the system, for getting the radiation temperature of the earth. Because in this case it’s just conservation of energy and heat flow CAN be ignored, because all of the input from the sun is heat. So reference to heat is dispensed with because all the input IS heat because its shortwave from the sun. And all flow is downstream in the radiative temperature analysis.

    But then going inside the system, you really do need to reference heat flows explicitly and what directions are involved, because now there are more elements.

    The subtleties here are not that incomprehensible! But it certainly doesn’t help when these people have literally never seen a heat flow equation!!!!!! Lol

  7. Boomie i might dl that debate and edit out the irrelevant parts and post it on my channel. Ok with that or no?

  8. boomie789 says:

    No problem with me. Try and hide that guys Identity at least. Even though he is full of shit. He doesn’t care about being doxed, just embarrassed he lost the debate.

  9. I’ll edit out all side discussion etc too.

  10. boomie789 says:

    Let me know if that black mark I put over his name is an issue, I’ll provide the raw footage.

  11. Joseph E Postma says:

    Hey Boomie can you upload the original (raw) someplace for me to grab? All the youtube downloaders don’t seem to work anymore.

  12. boomie789 says:


  13. boomie789 says:

    I’m only at 31% uploaded lol. Tomorrow morning it should be ready. Using MEGA free version, 150-250KB/s.

  14. I’m on fibre optic 😁

  15. boomie789 says:

    JEALOUS. My upload speed 2.4MB/s. It’s this MEGA cloud service restricting it. It’s the one I always see others using, so I figured it must be one of the better options.

  16. boomie789 says:

    Apollonian Germ-

    “Well I feel like it’s kind of a strawman debate to go back and forth about whether or not a colder object can warm up a warmer object, because the alleged mechanism is that the atmosphere itself is becoming more insulated by the increase in Co2.

    I’d say an analogy is something like this… since I’ve been buying so many wool sweaters lol… it’s like the Earth is covered with a sweater (the atmosphere) and the additional Co2 is like adding more and more thread to the sweater.

    It’s not the sweater that heats up the earth, it’s the sweater that’s supposed to just hold in more of the heat transferred by the sun.

    Now I don’t even believe in man made global warming, but I thought a lot of the argument was missing the point somehow

    Now I’d say a real critique would be to argue whether or not CO2 is an “effective thread” adding insulation to the sweater, so to speak, or whether it is enough “thread” to make any significant difference

    Or something along those lines”

  17. boomie789 says:


    I’m sorry, but the model does not show insulation, it shows cold adding to hot.

    “Their climate GHE should be able to be experimentally confirmed in real greenhouses, but it isn’t. This is an empirical disproof. 2) Their climate GHE necessitates recycling and reverse flow of heat, which is of course a violation of theory. Hence it is theoretically invalid which goes with the empirical disproof. 3) The origin of their climate GHE is in their flat Earth models where the Sun cannot create the climate, and thus their GHE is then postulated to make up for what their flat Earth cold sunshine cannot do in such a model. In reality of course the Sun does do it all, but their empirically invalid starting point for deriving their GHE explains why they then run into the theoretical problems as above which of course has its own lack of empirical support.”

    That is a reply from Postma I have saved. I’ll shoot what you have to say over to him. He can always respond better than me.

    Also, C02 would be an ineffective thread. It’s ability to transfer infrared, being a good absorber/emitter, would take heat away from the surface faster, not hold it in.

  18. Joseph E Postma says:

    Is that on the discord?

  19. boomie789 says:


  20. boomie789 says:


  21. boomie789 says:

    done. check email.

  22. Joseph E Postma says:

    K got it…thx. Might be a couple of days before getting to it.

  23. boomie789 says:

    No mention of the torture porn with 10 year old Chinese girls rumor I was hearing. But, it does have child pornography on it.

  24. CD Marshall says:

    I love that quote from JP!

    Short,sweet and concise.

  25. ashemann says:

    I was reading some guff about solar panels and a guy gushing about ”new ones” being 20% efficienrt and the panels getting a flux of about a 1000 jules a second and conversion rates etc watts of course. average for 12 hours a day…

    Same person of course believes that the RGHE is actual science and reality and that is 250 watts or something close to it average for 24 hours…
    And also believe and gush about solar panels getting an average 500 jules per hour .. and so debunking the RGHE he believes is real as no RGHE needed to double the flux of ”heat” to the surface.

  26. ashemann says:

    A second i mean…” 500 jules per hour ”

  27. These people are ridiculous and disgusting. Sounds just like how debating flat earth climate alarm goes

  28. Joseph E Postma says:

    “It can’t be verified!
    It can’t be verified!
    It can’t be verified!”

    Oh but “Russian Collusion” was totally verified…and climate change is totally verified!

    These fn disgusting people.

  29. Impossible levels of retardation

  30. CD Marshall says:

    Maurice Strong: (The real founder of the IPCC)

    “The world’s second richest man, worth some $44 billion, gave 85% of his wealth in July of 2006 to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

    The lion’s share of the Gates foundation goes into United Nations sanctioned projects. Make that the fomenting for One World Government anti-American United Nations.”

    Ties to Gates and the One World Government. Now why would he donate all that money to Gates? For what possible future plan were they fronting?

  31. boomie789 says:

    I’m amazed how ok everyone is with wearing mask. Really blackpilling. I’ve been walking into stores without it no problem. Nobody said anything to me yet. Only when I went to the eye doctor and dentist. Even then I went to the dentist twice, didn’t wear it the first time. The second time there was an elderly woman in the lobby so I went ahead and wore it.

    Why is it okay to touch gas nozzles when refueling your car? When I went to the dentist I had to press a button to buzz the receptionist. Nobody was cleaning the button. The old lady touched the button not 1min after me. The credit card readers at gas stations. door handles. Shouldn’t we be wearing gloves just as much as the mask? Why aren’t those required when entering a business?

    O you put up a little 2×2 plastic window up by the cashier? I’m sure that will help. /s

    Just venting. Sometimes I wish this this virus was what they claimed it would be. Maybe we are in desperate need of a culling. But, I don’t really mean that. Seeing all those mask pisses me off. Those are a bunch of young healthy adults. They shouldn’t be worried about the virus at all. What is it? 99.4% survival rate? 😡

  32. CD Marshall says:

    You should always wear a mask at your PC just in case your computer catches a virus.

  33. boomie789 says:

    Most of those kids don’t have the balls to be one of the few people not wearing a mask. People can’t stand being the odd one out. Doesn’t bother me. I might have some sort of superiority complex or something. I think lesser of them.

    I would be in that crowd without a mask no problem. Bunch of dogs wearing their muzzles.

    Or maybe I’m just a disagreeable asshole lol.

  34. boomie789 says:

    Shared. Thanks Robert. I can’t share to Reddit for some reason but posted in other places.

  35. Really well done

  36. CD Marshall says:

    These people are so corrupt when Project Veritas revealed the abortion slaughterhouses, who Pelosi has money in {allegedly} if memory serves me right, they went after Project Veritas not the criminals in California and prosecuted them.

  37. CD Marshall says:

    If you have the time could you link me the accumulated information you have on the Biden/Chinese and Hunter’s sex crimes.

    Thank you. 🙂

  38. boomie789 says:

    Ask and you shall receive

    I left out the stuff that mentions the 10 year old Chinese torture porn stuff. Which I guess wasn’t true?
    And I left out the stuff from Isaac and the repair shop.

  39. boomie789 says:

    James O’Keefe is an American hero. 😍

    @CD Marshall

    Need Postma to approve my comment. To many links I think.

  40. boomie789 says:

    It’s to many links for one post worried that would happen.

    1 more try, I’ll break it up this time. First the vids, then articles.

  41. boomie789 says:

    Ok. You can delete those other failed comments if you like.

    Everything in one link this time.

    @CD Marshall

  42. boomie789 says:

    If I was smarter I would have done that the first time.

  43. boomie789 says:

    Added even more to it. I think that’s pretty much everything. Hopefully the Biden’s go to prison were they belong. Really they deserve the rope, after a fair trial of course.

  44. boomie789 says:

    The freshest news. atm.

  45. CD Marshall says:

    Thanks BOOMIE excellent work BTW. I posted it one ABC news on YT lol that should get the goat going.

  46. CD Marshall says:

    A legit physics question for anyone.

    It is claimed that 15 micron is equal to a black body radiating at -80C.

    I did the math for Wien’s Law and got 79.97C.

    So nothing on Earth emits at a peak emission of -80C.

    We know a full spectrum emits larger than the peak wavelength, although I can’t find the statistics for that, it does emit in different wavelengths which is the largest difference of a source of radiation and a spectra line.

    Thus it stands to reason since 15 micron is emitting from the surface something is emitting it warmer than -80C and If it is emitting from the whole surface then something is not adding up in emission frequencies.

    What is the range of photons emitting from a radiating source and where is that found? Does some wls exceed the peak wls but not enough to change temperature?

    Or is 15 micron just the residue of energy split so many times it has almost no energy left? Under the COE Law that would stand as a reasonable explanation.

    Energy from the Sun isn’t reversible. Once that energy is broken down it can’t be restored to its original frequency/wavelength and neither does energy emitting from the surface or back from the atmosphere. So in theory, energy can be broken down to infinitesimal portions. At what point does a photon stop splitting or breaking down? Is there a limit under the Bose-Einstein Statistic?

  47. CD Marshall says:

    Naturally I meant the energy splitting into smaller photons not the photon itself.

  48. CD Marshall says:

    Just to be clearer for anyone who is going to nitpick (if anyone does), the photon is absorbed and that energy is broken down, if re-emitting that energy it can emit a duplicate under certain conditions, but usually the energy is broken down and emitted as weaker photons the same energy of course, just spread out more.

  49. Thermal radiation is given by the Planck Law and occurs over a spectrum…a range of wavelengths. A warmer spectrum has higher frequencies that a cooler spectrum does not, and also has a greater intensity of emission over all wavelengths that a cooler spectrum has.

  50. It’s not quite really the same energy. Think of a droplet of water put into a lake, and then scooping some water out of the lake – did you really get that droplet back? So, energy gets absorbed into a body; energy comes back out again but now that energy is a, and has the, properties of the body.

  51. CD Marshall says:

    So 15 micron isn’t about the energy absorbed, its just part of the ambient energy emissions from the newer source of radiation, the planet and thus a much weaker source of radiation.

    Amazing how easy you understand these things.

  52. CD Marshall says:

    So I snagged a student studying atmopsheric physics. This should be a hoot. I wonder if he will actually talk the science or just insult me an claim I don’t understand the science. I’m looking forward to seeing how smart he actually is.

    Most of them come on strong then when you unravel the algorithm they’ve been using you realize they are idiots, like Biden off the teleprompter. Once you get them “off script” they can’t formulate a scientific theory if their life depended on it.

  53. CD Marshall says:

    So been studying Atmospheric Physics, and yet ANOTHER version of the “Runaway Greenhouse Effect” cleverly subjugated with science-like language:

    1. Increase (inject more) water vapor to the air.
    2. Reduce the temperature of the air.

    If the planet has a very high temperature that the air can never reach a saturation point it creates a Runaway Greenhosue Effect:

    A. Water vapor can be added to the atmosphere.
    B .More water vapor traps more heat (the greenhouse effect).
    C. The planet’s temperature increases furthermore.
    D. More greenhouse effect.
    E. More water vapor

    …keeps increasing temps…

  54. There’s that trapping heat trope again…

  55. CD Marshall says:

    You know the crazy thing is it actually taught heat and energy with a subtle slip into fake science. The laws of thermodynamics are sloppy explained. So subtle how that they slip that in:

    Heat and Energy:

    Energy is the capacity to do work.

    Heat is one form of energy.

    Heat is one form of internal energy {This is the switch from real science to fake science} which is associated with the random, disordered motion of molecules and atoms.

    Internal kinetic/potential energy are different from the macroscopic kinetic/potential energy.

    The 1st LOT

    This law states that heat is a form of energy is such that total energy is conserved.
    Delta U = Q – W

    {Then the go back to stating heat needs to be added again.}

    Heat and temperature are both related to the internal kinetic energy of air molecules, and therefore can be related to each other in the following way:

    Q(heat added) = c (specific heat) * m (Mass) * Delta T (temperature change).

    Water Vapor:
    It basically states heat is transferred from the Earth’s surface by water vapor. Without the evaporation process the global surface temperature would be 67C instead of 15C. The evaporation of 1m of water causes Earth’s surface to lose 83 W/m^2. {insert radiative forcing here}

  56. Yep you identify the switch. Heat is NOT NOT NOT internal thermal energy.

    Of course they sloppify the definitions…the entire field requires sophistry!

  57. boomie789 says:

    Check out what I found…

  58. CD Marshall says:

    Evil Mr. Rogers is popping up everywhere isn’t he?

  59. boomie789 says:

    Hitler’s philosophy was not for us to be all the same, exactly the opposite as a matter a fact.

    He wanted Germany for the Germans. Italy for the Italians. Japan for the Japanese.

    Hitler would probably agree with the quote “Let a thousand nations bloom”. If he didn’t say it himself.

    Anyway let me not defend Hitler to much, just a little nit pick. Cool content creator.

  60. Yah it’s the communists who wanted everyone to be the same in a globalist ghetto…not the nationalists.

  61. CD Marshall says:

    So this was one reply I received. It’s so integrated in pseudo science and so well twisted its hard to know where to start. I’m working on a reply but I was wondering if anyone had some input?

    “Simply scientifically wrong. Water vapor precipitates out too quickly to maintain the greenhouse effect but it is an effective feedback. CO2 lingers for decades and centuries. NASA: “it is the non-condensing greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, ozone, nitrous oxide, and chlorofluorocarbons that provide the necessary atmospheric temperature structure that ultimately determines the sustainable range for atmospheric water vapor and cloud amounts, and thus controls their radiative contribution to the terrestrial greenhouse effect. From this it follows that these non-condensing greenhouse gases provide the temperature environment that is necessary for water vapor and cloud feedback effects to operate, without which the water vapor dominated greenhouse effect would inevitably collapse and plunge the global climate into an icebound Earth state.”

    American Institute of Physics:

    SciTechDaily: …Earth’s upper atmosphere controls the radiation that escapes to space. The upper atmosphere is much less dense and contains much less water vapor than near the ground, which means that adding more carbon dioxide significantly influences how much infrared radiation escapes to space.

  62. CD Marshall says:

    So Joseph I inadvertently gained the attention of a physicist:
    “I’m curious. Why do you think radiative forcing does not exist when you are aware of the atmosphere and basic physics ? Radiative forcing is, as I and many physicists claim, real and even if it doesn’t dictate the temperatures in the atmosphere as you suggest, it certainly influences the temperatures of earth’s surface. Whilst you are right by saying that the troposphere is a Carnot cycle, the atmosphere is not, as the majority of physicists will confirm.”

  63. boomie789 says:

    “which means that adding more carbon dioxide significantly influences how much infrared radiation escapes to space.”

    I have something saved from Postma for that statement.

    2-“increases the emissivity of the atmosphere, because the entire point of so-called “greenhouse gases” is that they emit. The atmosphere is 99% nitrogen and oxygen which do not emit thermal radiation…so 99% of the atmosphere has very low emissive power, i.e., low emissivity. This means that 99% of the atmosphere already very efficiently holds on to thermal energy, to its temperature. But now we add CO2, which is emissive, and thus we’ve given the atmosphere a vector by which it can emit thermal radiation to space where it couldn’t at all before. So adding emissivity to something which had low emissivity previously is going to allow the substance to cool, or equilibrate at a cooler temperature then before. So the actual physics of radiation insulation would indicate that adding an emissive substance (CO2) into a non-emissive substance (N2 and O2 99%) is now going provide a vector by which the non-emissive substance can shed thermal energy, because obviously the N2 and O2 physically bumb into CO2 and give CO2 their energy, and then the CO2 radiatively emits that energy. CO2 is collisionally-dominated with N2 and O2 – for every photon CO2 emits, it is bumped physically by N2/O2 something like a billion times. So N2/O2 are constantly dumping their energy into CO2, and occasionally CO2 emits that energy whereas without CO2 that energy wouldn’t have been able to escape.”

    I’ll post the rest too.

    What you describe as insulation with a sweater, the mechanism involved there, is the retardation of convection. The warmth of your skin, relative to the cooler air, generates tiny little eddies that wick heat away from your skin. The same thing happens to the surface of the Earth itself. Real greenhouses, and sweaters, STOP convection – they stop the air from circulating and from wicking the heat away either from the surface (greenhouse) or your skin (sweater). You heat up the sweater to closer to your skin temperature than the air is, and then you feel warmer. The sweater can be heated up by your body because it is a small mass, whereas you can’t warm up the open air because it is effectively an infinite sink/mass compared to the heat that you put out.

    Incoming solar radiation is capable of heating the surface to scalding temperatures. This induces air circulation because as the air, in contact with the surface, is heated by conduction/diffusion/convection/radiation from the surface, and warm air is less dense and so the warm air rises away. Since the warm air rises away, then this keeps the remaining air cooler. Witness the inside of your vehicle with windows closed on a sunny day where the air was stopped from rising away, compared to air just outside the vehicle: the vehicle interior air is much much warmer than the air just outside the vehicle. The inside of your car is the same thing as a real greenhouse: it stopped convection, stopped the air from being able to rise away or be exchanged, and thus the air inside your car or greenhouse rises to the temperature at which it is being heated – which is quite hot, from the sun, easily 120F and more. Raw solar power is actually up tp +121C, or 286F.

    In radiative terms, and these are the terms of the greenhouse effect of climate alarm (the greenhouse effect of climate alarm is not about convection as per how an actual greenhouse functions, but is about radiation), then insulation is called emissivity. The poorer that a surface or object or substance can radiate thermal energy, the lower its so-called emissivity. Thus if a fixed amount of energy must be radiated, then an object with a lower emissivity must attain a higher temperature in order to be able to pump out the necessary energy. Vice versa, a substance with higher emissivity can emit the same amount of radiant thermal energy at a lower temperature.
    The existence of CO2 in the atmosphere:
    1) does not change the ground/physical surface’s emissivity, since the emissivity of a substance is a property of the substance/surface itself, not a property of something else nearby or touching the object. CO2 in the atmosphere does not change the emissivity of the physical surface, hence does not alter the radiative ability of the surface, hence cannot change the temperature of the surface this way.

    (The (2) above goes here.)

    The point is that the entire scheme and premise of the climate alarmist radiative greenhouse effect contradicts basic physics theory, notwithstanding, and perhaps as a result of, it being based on false modeling premises in the first place.

    Lastly, the scheme of the radiative greenhouse should actually then also explain how a real greenhouse functions, and it should predict the temperature inside a greenhouse. However, the temperatures predicted by the climate alarmist radiative greenhouse mechanics are not observed inside a real greenhouse, and the only temperatures measured inside a real greenhouse are those expected from the stoppage of convection only…there is no additional effect from “radiation insulation”. So this is empirical proof to go along with the existing theory which demonstrates that the climate alarmist radiative greenhouse effect does not exist or function.

    Thermodynamics took hundreds of years to solve for a reason. It is still one of the most difficult fields…really. A comment from my favorite thermodynamics textbook (Schroeder, 2000):

    “Much of thermodynamics deals with three closely related concepts: temperature, energy, and heat. Much of students’ difficulty with thermodynamics comes from confusing these three concepts with each other.”

    temperature, energy, and heat – it is crucial to understand that these are not all the same thing…for one thing anyway

    (Will continue in new comment)

  64. Ask the physicist to debate me.

  65. boomie789 says:

    As I discussed in that debate…the main issue here is the interpretation of that downward arrow in that Figure 2.3. In climate alarm physics that arrow is interpreted as a temperature-increasing function, as a temperature-increasing mechanism. One must ask: what is the mechanism, in physics, that could perform this function? Well, we refer to the first law of thermodynamics: to increase a body’s temperature, you require work and/or heat. The scenario isn’t about work being done here, and so, the only possibility of that downward arrow to act as a temperature-increasing mechanism is if that downward arrow is heat. That downward arrow has to be heat.

    However, we then must refer to the known definitions and mathematical expressions for heat – well, heat is not something that can flow from the colder atmosphere to the warmer surface. And so that downward arrow cannot be interpreted as heat. Thus there’s no way that that downward arrow could serve to increase the temperature of the warmer surface.

    We should then consider that the only reason why that downward arrow is interpreted as heat by climate alarm, is because they treat the solar input as equal to the terrestrial output, at -18C or 255K. They begin their model of the climate under the premise that the sun cannot heat the Earth to above -18C…that the Sun cannot and does not create the climate or temperatures above -18C! So under that premise, they then desire to interpret that downward arrow as being able to heat the surface further even though heat could never flow in that direction.

    And YES, in their peer-reviewed literature, they do indeed state and believe that the atmosphere must heat the Earth at TWICE the power and ability of the Sun. And YES, indeed, they do literally believe that the Sun DOES NOT heat the Earth or create Earth’s climate.

  66. 1 Radiative forcing occurs as per the radiative heat flow equation. From hot to cold. That’s the only radiative forcing that can exist. Thus the atmosphere cannot force the surface to higher temperature. 2 If GHGs are emissive then they cool. The rest of the atmosphere holds thermal energy very efficiently because it can’t emit.

  67. CD Marshall says:

    Okay Joseph but the only way I can even open the door is to say a “A friendly discussion for educational purposes,” no one is interested in a confrontation on the consensus side. Yo;u have proven you can maintain your composure.

  68. CD Marshall says:

    Within reason, mind you, always within the reason.

  69. Sure…say whatever you need to invite them.

  70. CD Marshall says:

    For once I’d love to see another physicist who isn’t afraid of open discussion (besides you).

  71. boomie789 says:

    There is also a picture of supposedly Malia Obama being poked(sex) by Hunter. With a photo of Malia’s credit card cutting up coke. Unconfirmed.

    add .png to end of link if you want to see. Took it off so the picture doesn’t embed. You cant really see anything but it is a bit lewd.

  72. ashemann says:

    I read roberts artile on the HUB pages ..
    Evidence or the lack of it for cloth masks…

    Well i noticed that stocking wearing bank robbers are unaffected by covid 1984,
    Not one case reported of a stocking wearing shotgun wielding robber getting infected.

    So get some stockings and a shotgun and you will be fine, you cant argue with the data..

  73. boomie789 says:

    Reddit keeps taking down my links!!! 🤬😡


  74. ashemann says:

    A fine article by the way.

  75. CD Marshall says:

    These climate scientists have thin skin. The physicist who I was ingratiatingly kind to, still considered any disagreement with the status quo an “argument.”

  76. CD Marshall says:

    Even Hyper-Physics, typically a great source is now corrupted with the GHGE…

    “The greenhouse effect refers to circumstances where the short wavelengths of visible light from the sun pass through a transparent medium and are absorbed, but the longer wavelengths of the infrared re-radiation from the heated objects are unable to pass through that medium. The trapping of the long wavelength radiation leads to more heating and a higher resultant temperature. Besides the heating of an automobile by sunlight through the windshield and the namesake example of heating the greenhouse by sunlight passing through sealed, transparent windows, the greenhouse effect has been widely used to describe the trapping of excess heat by the rising concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The carbon dioxide strongly absorbs infrared and does not allow as much of it to escape into space.”

    A complete and utter physics lie.

  77. CD Marshall says:

    According to climte science this statement never existed…
    “So there is no greenhouse effect. You have just proved that climate science is utterly wrong to think otherwise. This is the scandal that so many “experts” in climate science, and all the scientific authorities, will not face. Listen to the physicists that tell you there is no greenhouse effect; they know without having to go to the Venus data — and I am one of them. The continuing incompetence on this vital point among so many scientists, for more than a century, is amazing, and tragic.” -Harry Dale Huffman 2010

  78. CD Marshall says:

    This Clive Best character is something isn’t he? Claiming that convection wouldn’t exist w/o greenhouse gases? Yikes what a nutter.

    This was his reply to another’s comment on those grounds.
    “There would initially be convection and conduction through inert gases until the atmosphere reached thermal equilibrium. This would basically equal the initial surface temperature. Gravity maintains for ever a pressure gradient but it cannot maintain a temperature gradient indefinitely. Otherwise where would the heat escape to space?”

  79. CD Marshall says:

    Someone mentioned heat doesn’t escape to space but I think they are confused with terminology.
    Anything is considered “heat” to a colder object and where is that line drawn in the atmosphere?

    EM radiation is the only means of emissions to space and yes, that’s not heat it is simply energy in transit. Thus technically you could say heat doesn’t escape however they ruined it by claiming the cold of space negates the heat.

  80. Wow that’s an excellent article!

  81. CD Marshall says:

    Joseph I was trying to make a simple reply for CO2 lasers/atmosphere which just kills the argument in short terms. This is what I came up with so anything to add or correct?

    “Lasers create a coherent light beam created from a stimulated emission process solar and surface radiation emits incoherent light and spreads out in all directions. Apples to oranges and not even an argument.”

  82. Yes that’s great.

  83. CD Marshall says:

    LOL so this was the reply…
    “The NET flow is Bosons can stack to some extent if they are coherent. IR radiation is incoherent so what you state is actually a violation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle. I suggest you stop trying to fool people with your false physics. A refresher with a dash of ethics might be to your benefit.”

    What on Earth?

  84. Haha wtf!!?? This is just word salad sophistry trying to cover up a lost position.

  85. “The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn’t help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn’t help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. They had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn’t remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.
    Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.
    I didn’t know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying.”

  86. They just lie, and then PROJECT. They project onto others what they themselves are doing.

  87. CD Marshall says:

    LOL exactly like jelly. AND then you have to spend time debunking ridiculous comments like why bosons don’t apply to the PEP and they keep spinning stupid science so it sounds like YOU have no idea what you are talking about. Secondly, they just averted the conversation and took control of the narrative by placing you on the defense. You are so right they use this tactic time and again. IF you do strike a “telling a blow” days later not only did it not happen (in their mind), they now have convinced themselves they “schooled you” in the process.

    Yet I talked to an actual physicist the other day who said, “It was refreshing to actually converse with someone who knows his physics, even if we think about it differently.”

    In that case they refuse to surrender the forcing issue and did not want their little world science beliefs disrupted.

  88. CD Marshall says:

    Science it seems has become stagnant in the mainstream and they do not challenge themselves thus they never grow.

  89. boomie789 says:

    There goes my 10 year old reddit account. Permanently suspended for posting “involuntary pornagraphy”. Hunter Biden of course. Bummer. Maybe my appeal will work.

    I can make another account still. And still have all the info stored in there. Going to probably transfer stuff over to a new account. Don’t know what will happen to r/Propertarian. Gosh I wish I didn’t post that.

    F 😔

  90. The media companies are the enemy of the planet.

  91. Zelator says:

    When the student is ready ….

    Divine Law and the Holy Grail:

  92. CD Marshall says:

    Boomie I’m sorry to hear that man, you worked very hard on that. Great you saved it though, at least you have that. Damage control for Biden will be rampant.

    I heard an Obama-Biden sex tape was out there once upon a time (Hunter-Obama daughter) but Obama used gov resources to wipe the internet of it. LOL That may have been from you?

  93. CD Marshall says:

    This was his whole word salad reply. Sounds like complete gibberish to me with a little bit of reals cience peppered in to sound like he knows what he’s talking about. Deny-Deflect-Discredit.

    “You are confusing heat flow and net heat flow. In absolute terms a cold body cannot raise the temperature of a warm body but the flow of energy from the warm to the cold is relative to the difference between the two. If the cold body’s temperature rises the net heat flow is less.”

    Which is a completely irrelevance statement. Heat flows one way from hot to cold energy flows both ways.

    “The temperature of the earth will adjust until the outgoing IR radiation matches the incoming solar radiation. The incoming is relatively constant so when the outgoing is reduced because of atmospheric IR absorption then the overall temperature must rise in order to raise the outgoing IR to again match the incoming energy.”

    Not one true fact in this deliberately mixing COE with thermal equilibrium.

    “Anything warmer than absolute zero radiates energy.”
    again mixing heat with energy and making no distinctions in the requirements needed to increase T.

    “The NET flow is Bosons can stack to some extent if they are coherent. IR radiation is incoherent so what you state is actually a violation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle.”

    Just a sad attempt of trying to sound coherent. Ha ha.

    “I suggest you stop trying to fool people with your false physics. A refresher with a dash of ethics might be to your benefit.”

    Which is exactly what he did.

  94. Your analysis is spot-on…that is exactly their sophist game. You found one of them that’s really well trained in it.

    “You are confusing heat flow and net heat flow”

    That is SUCH a sophist BS statement, as you know. As if there is some distinction here.

    “but the flow of energy from the warm to the cold is relative to the difference between the two”

    You see the conflation of energy with heat, there. They always love to intermix heat vs. energy…and ignore the difference as it suits them, and use the difference as it suits them, etc.

    These FN people….

  95. boomie789 says:

    The “Reddit Anti-Evil Operations Team” has denied my appeal. Seriously that’s what they call themselves.

    How Ironic.

  96. “Reddit Anti-Evil Operations Team” – bunch of fruitcake retards…god sakes the planet is being given over to control by fruitcake retards

  97. So condescending too to imply that you’re either willingly, or to stupid to understand that you are, engaging in evil operations.

  98. Zelator says:

    Just like the Fisher King in his Castle Corbenic yearned to fill his nets with the
    righteous, the ignorant and the ignavi flowed right through……..

    ,,,,,,,,,,What ails thee Lord? Ohhhhh the pain…..

  99. CD Marshall says:

    “Reddit Anti-Evil Operations Team” good grief the world is stuck on stupid.

  100. Zelator says:

    The world is a fucking Cosmic Joke….. ain’t you got that yet? Lolololol

  101. Now everything is about race:

    We never used to give a fuck. I LITERALLY never used to gave a single fuck about skin color. But now…I have to ONLY CELEBRATE OTHER SKIN COLORS AND IF I DON’T PARTICIPATE I AM A NAZI WHO SHOULDNT EXIST OR HAVE A JOB! haha

    Image if I were to want a “White physics week.” No, the entire purpose of white people is now to celebrate other skin colors…that’s all our purpose is now.

  102. Zelator says:

    It is about race. It is about removing the White Race. The White Race is a threat to the other side. Caucasians are a special bloodline. Maybe we have the key to exit this shit hole???? What was the Mark of Cain?

  103. I don’t know…what was the Mark of Cain?

  104. Zelator says:

    I think maybe a bloodtype. An inherent trait? Obviously it wasn’t a physical mark as in literal.

  105. Maybe you need the Soul Camera to see it.

  106. Zelator says:

    Hey now that makes sense.

  107. Zelator says:

    The Armageddon Conspiracy explains the Cain part…..and Hitler

  108. Zelator says:

    Either way it needs to be destroyed. It is cruel and evil. Hell on Earth. Only the Demiurge could conjure up something so wicked.

  109. Zelator says:

    Kleck was right about angels trapped in matter. This is the world of the damned,

  110. Yes…but Hitler used the reverse-chirality form of the Swastika which then associated themselves to anti-existence. Like DNA, and light, the structure can spiral either clockwise or counterclockwise. DNA rotates in only one direction, though. We find things like this in physics too. Only one chirality, one rotation, is found in life. If the effect of these symbol-mandala’s is truly as profound as they say…then Hitler’s Swastika with its reverse-chirality not only destroyed them, but also eventually destroyed even the white-skinned enemies of Hitler given how all or Europe is now destroyed.

    You are familiar with Hockney…and the God Equation. The Swastika is literally a symbolic representation of the God Equation. If so, and it is, then that is one symbol which you do not want to F with and write it backwards, because existence will negate it.

  111. Anti-existence, reverse chirality:

    Pro-existence, forward chirality:

  112. I’ve read that Hitler was given his symbol from an Oriental secret lodge. If so…they may have known just what symbol they were giving him and what it would do to him and his movement. The direction of rotation matters.

  113. Zelator says:

    That’s interesting. I noticed the reverse figuration of their Swastica. Studies (mirror) using isochiral frequencies have shown astral projection can be obtained by listening to isochiral music. You believe astral projection could be a way to escape the matrix? What is the difference in effect from isochronic and isochiral frequencies?

  114. Good questions.

    As I wrote in my 2nd book, Astral travel or out of body travel seems to be one of the big secrets of secret societies and illuminism. The bigger secret is what you find out while there. Did you know that there’s this place there called “The Invisible College”?! You can study there. Most humans who ever went were only interested in emotional and mythical answers to their existence…Hockney was the first human to go there and ask about the mathematical answers to existence, and bring them back here. Anyway…there’s a university for OBE travellers…but its “invisible”…you can’t get there by land or sea…lol.

    Pindar: “Neither by land nor sea can you find the way to Hyperborea.”

  115. Zelator says:

    Isochronic frequencies are not binaural. They effect the brain in everday surroundings hence why they are more powerful as a tool. I recently came across Isochiral tones and wondered what their advantage was to brain entrainment. Both remove the Ego plague that was shown in a previous video.

  116. Zelator says:

    That’s interesting ” the Invisible college as it makes sense. Look back at that 2nd video. The “College ” is there to access if you get through the plague of the ego. I have writtten documents from non of my own words. They come from the “College”. We all have access to it. Its called being in the zone, the flow. Where everything is perfect. Enlightenment is removing the dross ( the trees) to see the wood. Then you can choose to stay in this world or leave it. Many ( Masters of the Game) or Archons choose to stay and Lord over us mere mortals. Its their Kingdom, the Kingdom of the damned. WE are destined to repeat our mistakes and suffer until we learn the TRUTH. The truth is we are born into bondage and we have to play the game to learn the knowledge ( Gnosiss) to escape. The good news is there is a happy ending. Depends on how attache you are to this shit world.

  117. boomie789 says:

    Interesting tid bit I though up about clockwise-counterclockwise rotation somewhat recently.

    I think I was wrong before now actually looking at an animation.

    From looking at that animation, It appears if you were floating above the earth’s axis, like an angel, the earth would be rotating COUNTER-CLOCKWISE? A bad omen I would think.

    But, If you were looking from below, like a demon, the earth would be rotating CLOCKWISE?

    Doubt there is really any significance. I did like it better when I thought it was the other way though.

  118. Zelator says:

    Yeh I believe the Pindar phrase comes from the entry of souls into this world which would be the astrological Cancer point and we depart from the other pole the Capricorn gateway of the souls. It’s the recycle, the punishment of eternal damnation. Re=incarnation to do it all again and again. Its the descent into material hell, as portrayed in the Sistine Chapel and Kleck shows the horror of angels being trapped in matter. The Horror . We are angels who transgressed against God and pure light and fell. We are the damned. We chose fornication and materiality over angelic spiritual lightness. We need to find our way home. Gnosis is the way home.

  119. Zelator says:

    Lol Boomie you intuition is probably right, everything is reversed.

  120. Yes, but you see, we were told that if we came here then we could become higher than we were, that the struggle within this domain would make us stronger and even greater than “God”. They tricked us with their flat Earth “plane” model of spiritual existence, and said that the struggle of the low frequencies in this domain would cause our already-higher frequencies to become higher still.

    But of course, as I’ve now shown, their low frequencies do not add to or improve our higher frequencies at all. Their flat “plane” spiritual Earth model violates the laws of mathematics, which cannot be transgressed. As Kleck points out, their entire lie was only to get us to come here so that they could feed off of us, off of our higher frequencies. That’s why they keep lying about everything…to get us to stay here, confused about everything unable to escape while they keep eating us. And that’s why they love and defend at all costs that flat Earth physics diagram of climate alarm…it is a basic archetypal representation of their entire grand spiritual lie.

    You ever notice that the love symbol, the heart, is the shape of the back of the throat? Love, the angels having sex, is literally how they eat angel energy frequencies. We think we’re making “love”, but our male orgasm and emission of energy is food for them, going down their throat. That’s why there is such a strong archetypal attraction for men for that related “sex act”…because that’s what’s actually happening on the unseen spiritual level, is our energy is being consumed. It is really a brilliant system. Attract us to something we all think would be really freaking great to engage in, so much fun, we’ll do it over and over again, and we’ll use this odd heart-shape to represent “love”…but that shape actually signifies the back of a throat.

    With all this being said, the reality of the situation might be that this is precisely what must occur in order to bring the fractured-light reality of cosmic existence back to unity. Our light was fractured in the Big Bang, as we all chose it to be in order to initiate another cycle of Becoming, and this process split us into two parts – a material part and a spiritual part. The very way that this energy is brought back into unity is by consuming itself. That’s the only way. Or at least, that’s the way it was figured out by evolution here. But think of the Ouroboros, the snake eating its tail, one of the most ancient occultic symbols known to man – it represents the entire process of existence itself, existence eating itself. As the snake consumes itself and pulls its own body within itself, what happens when the mouth of the snake reaches the mouth of the snake!? That’s the Omega Point singularity. That is indeed when existence has fully pulled itself back into itself.

  121. Zelator says:

    The Nazis knew this. They said the dead outnumber the living. There is a waiting list to incarnate in this world and learn your gnosis to escape. If you don’t learn you may be stuck in pergatory waiting till your next chance.
    They ( or Cain ) wanted to end this. They believed the Aryan bloodline went back to Cain.
    Cain wanted to destroy the god of this world ( The Demiurge) who punished him for killing his brother Abel. This world was evil and they wanted to kill its maker.

  122. Of course, that Big Bang may have simply been the initial salvo in an information warfare attack, to get the Angels to create this universe where we interact with this enemy, only to be consumed by them and never able to defeat them. The only solution, as in the movie “War Games”, is actually to not play with them at all.

  123. Zelator says:

    Yes the shitty part is we are stuck in a factory. WE are the ingredients. That Omega point were the snake eats itself is your critical point of extraction. The microcosm of the macrocosm. That’s probably your death point. That’s an extraction opportunity where you MUST have a choice. Some say the white light is a false track to re-incarnation. What is the other option? Choose the Dark? Go into the void of nothingness and disintegrate, You can see why souls choose the light. Just through fear and possible false images of loved ones.

  124. Zelator says:

    That’s a good point. This 3d universe is an anomaly. Was it created as a chess board? For the Gods to wage war?

  125. One thing is clear Z is that they really want us to make choices without understanding the choices that we’re making. All this “analysis paralysis” makes them irate…they hate us doing this.

  126. tom0mason says:

    The part of the warmist paradigm that I struggle to get my head around is that atmospheric CO2 levels are mainly determined by the ocean surface temperature and pCO2.

    Just saying.

  127. CD Marshall says:

    Listen to this arrogant twit…
    “Gentlemen, you may be familiar with the climate denier trolls
    No matter what point you make they will find some other point, it goes on and on forever. I never got any of them to shut up until I made a sudden realization and I accused them of working for oil companies and special interest groups and suddenly they went silent and went elsewhere.
    I think I struck a nerve I believe exactly what happened with the election and the Russians is now happening with oil companies and special interest groups paying trolls to go on YouTube and deny climate change is real.”

    What a reversal of facts and tactics. Accuse the innocent of what crimes you are committing. It was from Simon’s channel.

    I felt like being nice to this one was not called for. For I goaded him by saying,
    ” Debate a physicist and prove it. Put your science where your mouth is. I’ll set it up. Liars are classic cowards though so I’m sure you’ll have a great excuse why you can’t do it and prove your so called facts to a real scientist.

    That invite includes Simon anytime he wants a live or recorded debate.

    Put up or shut up.”

  128. boomie789 says:

    YES. I’m moderator of r/Propertarian again! The was the only thing I was actually a little upset about losing. I have a back-up account as moderator too now.

  129. CD Marshall says:

    Funny I lived in the Ghetto Projects when I was a kid and my family lived happily in WVA some with outhouses and well water.

    These “poor people” have cell phones, big screen TVs and internet. The culture has been raped by politcal social engineering.

  130. CD Marshall says:

    So that guy I invited to debate you agreed.

    His user name is INFoPeace however, not sure if he will actually do it and use his real name or if he’ still just blowing bubbles. So where do I link him to contact you? Its YT so not discrete for contact information. I’m sure you have a few “dummy accounts” I call them, emails that are like throwaway phones I use to avoid SPAM from sites I have to use contact information for. Good thing too I had a few hacked in the past.

    This is his HOME PAGE:

    You can find the comment thread here in one of Simon’s videos…

    It’s at the bottom of 51 posts pinned under Simon Clark which should be the head comment. I believe you already posted there once.

    You did, a month ago,
    “Climate scientists deny that the sun heats the earth and creates and sustains its weather.”

  131. CD Marshall says:


    My brother is an ex-special forces (Marines RECON) and an astute watchdog of our rites and naturally is things go south my lead man in a crisis.

    He sent me this, very disturbing.

  132. CD Marshall says:

    It seems every election in anticipation of a democrat president the Left moves to takeaway more of America’s rights.

  133. boomie789 says:

    Guns & Gadgets is awesome. I almost wish they would just come for the guns, instead of slowly boiling the frog. I feel like we are running out of time…

  134. @CD – Where does he want to debate? Live via Zoom or something?? Just direct him here? Ask for his contact? Or just use my email address…it’s fine…I think you have it.

  135. CD Marshall says:

    Hi Joseph,
    I emailed you his contact info. Will resend.

  136. CD Marshall says:

    Hilarious I sent it to NASA climate branch lol they are probably wondering what on Earth?

  137. So he’s expecting an email, and how should I broach the discussion?

  138. CD Marshall says:

    He wanted to email you so I’m guessing he’ll send you how he would like to proceed. JUST say I’m the physicist who wants to debate climate science. How do you wanna go from here Zoom or another platform? He seems tech savvy enough hopefully he’s also not nuts but that’s a shorter list these days.

  139. CD Marshall says:

    So I sent and resent and all of that. We shall see? Either you or I should be getting an email from him if all went through correctly?

  140. CD Marshall says:

    Did he get in contact with you, yet? He’s going to be some work. Not sure what his “credential” are though. I hope its not another, if you don’t know what this means why are you telling me about radiation, type of deal.

    He’s a methane head by the looks of it, one of those thinking CH4 is going to destroy the world, even though the real residency of CH4 is only estimated 1-4 years. It does however, get broken down and CO2 is a by product of that process. This is Pierre’s field though, wherever he might be.

  141. CD Marshall says:

    I think he thought James McGinn was the one asking for it. He did email me “climate SPAM” I call it, I sent it to you for a laugh. Yeah I think this one is dead in the water.

    Wouldn’t you love to debate Bill Nye the “not so much science guy”?

  142. CD Marshall says:

    I’m not explaining this clear enough and I fear it will cause confusion.

    “Magnetic dipole molecules absorb and re-radiate IR where as a none-magnetic dipole molecule, once heated, can emit IR it cannot not however, {re-radiate that energy}.

    Therefore, once heated it must either cool off naturally back into a relaxed state or have that energy transferred to other molecules by way of collision or bumping.

    An atmospheric heated none magnetic molecular gas can only cool off via the lapse rate by cooling off naturally, a much slower process, seeing how this form is not {emitting at the speed of light.}”

    Should I use “shed off” in place of re-radiate when referring to magnetic dipole molecules. The “emit” is throwing me off for I think its setting me up for obfuscation.

    All molecules once heated emit EM energy, but only magnetic dipole molecules have the ability to shed off that energy. However, it is commonly stated that CO2 emits…I just don’t like the word choices, I think it can cause confusion.

    Plus I think that’s the point of the climate consensus anyway it is not a fact that only magnetic dipole molecules can emit IR. Once anything emits IR it is moving at the speed of light and thus would emit in the open window if in that spectrum, irregardless of the heated molecule.

    How would you phrase this for another physicist and how would you phrase it as a simple version?

  143. I think you’ve done pretty well. A molecule that can’t emit holds its thermal energy. QED

  144. CD Marshall says:

    Thanks going back to study QED 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s