A “Simple Experiment on Global Warming” to debunk the Radiative Greenhouse Effect, Climate Science, and Peer Review

This entry was posted in Fraud of the Greenhouse Effect and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

250 Responses to A “Simple Experiment on Global Warming” to debunk the Radiative Greenhouse Effect, Climate Science, and Peer Review

  1. boomie789 says:

    Reminds me of the Mythbusters experiment. I loved Mythbusters growing up too. I would watch it after I got home from school.

  2. Look at this absolute psycho. This is how they will speak about climate change…

  3. boomie789 says:

    Talk to me like that to my face. See what happens.

  4. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    So let’s see if I can get this straight… they measured 390 W m-2 surface radiant exitance (why do they show “reflected” of 30 W m-2 for solar insolation, but no “reflected” for their purported ‘backradiation’?… lower energy photons are more reflected for any given temperature.), so they’ve arrived at 288 K surface temperature, which gives a surface radiant exitance of 390.100033732608 W m-2 (if one assumes emission to 0 K and emissivity = 1… IOW, treating a real-world graybody object exactly as if it’s an idealized blackbody object).

    Then, because they’ve treated the planet’s surface as a flat disc with the sun-facing disc of the planet as the surface area, they’re forced to average solar insolation over that sun-facing disc to account for the planet’s curvature (because maximum solar irradiance only occurs with solar insolation perpendicular to the surface), which they’ve calculated to be 240 W m-2, which gives a calculated surface temperature of only 255.0652539398161 K (again, if treating the surface as an idealized blackbody object).

    Well, that’s a problem, because the two surface temperature numbers don’t match, so they invented ‘backradiation’ in the amount of 324 W m-2 to bring that calculated temperature up to the arrived-at 288 K surface temperature.

    And that gives an atmospheric temperature of 274.9379836784526 K (again, assuming emission to 0 K and emissivity = 1)… how does an atmosphere at their claimed 274.938 K warm a surface at their claimed 288 K?

    Then, to get their mathematical drivel to balance, they claim that thermals and latent heat only remove 102 W m-2 from the surface and another 40 W m-2 through the IR Atmospheric Window… which is diametrically opposite to the fact that ~76.2% of surface energy is removed via convection and latent heat capacity.

    Seriously… did they hire their climastrology staff from the local shortbus school?

  5. John Salamito says:

    It is hard to know what to say to such idiotic experiments, especially when peer reviewed. Obviously a peer group of idiots. I have made the following comment before and do so again mainly as I am making a point so obvious and so good at reframing the alarmists worldview that I feel it should be either used more or else someone needs to tell me I am missing something very obvious. I gave up trying to explain how the 2nd law of thermodynamics is contradicted, people don’t get photons or entropy and I appreciate why. But they do get that Work = Force x Distance because they have used a bicycle pump. Or lifted something. Or even climbed a mountain that gets colder as you go up (even if the CO2 doesn’t change).

    So both the argument and the truth is this:

    (1). Yes it is true the Sun heats the earth to only -18 degrees if there was no atmosphere and no gravity. Eliminate gravity so the air floats away and we freeze.
    (2). But there is an atmosphere which is there because gravity pulls it against the earth. The same calculation in (1) to get -18, will give you -59 degrees where the sun light touches the atmosphere (as opposed to the ground below the atmosphere). Happily this is indeed the temp at top of troposphere so we know it is true.
    (3). Now as you drop through the troposphere, down to sea level, there is work getting done under the force of gravity. Use W=F x D. This is roughly 9.8 m/s/s x 11 km = 108 degrees, so the earth surface is now -59+108 = 49 degrees, which far hotter than it really is (by about 34 degrees).
    (4). Fortunately in the atmosphere there is the greenhouse gas H2O. It adsorbs a lot of work/energy by turning water into gas and back into water. This has been measured for hundreds of years and the effect is the temperature gradient under gravity of 9.8 degrees per km in perfectly dry air reduces to 6.5 degrees in moist air. Thus the greenhouse moisture has a cooling effect of 3.3 degrees per km.
    (5). Thus the greenouse cools the earth from 49 degrees as calculated in 3 to the real temperature of 15 degrees. Greenhouse Gas (a.k.a. H2O) is a COOLANT.

    To deny the above you have to deny gravity. This is what I ask alarmist: Do you agree gravity exists? Do you agree gravity is a force, and applying force produces energy (work)? This is High School science.

    They are usually then completely baffled because they don’t know how to point to IPPC comments on gravity, or say something “I never thought of that before. I can’t disagree, but I have to think about it.” Which is a bit of a win as they are stumped even if unconverted.

    In all the above I have not had to mention CO2 or GHE. But I have accurately explained the earth’s temperature, as opposed to alarmists who are left with an “inexplicable” 33 degree hole for which they have to invent something to fill.

    The only inexplicable thing is why gravity is ignored. Once you put it in the thinking the flat earth model does not have to challenged (as scary as that is!).

    You can also ask people why moist rainforests at the same latitude as arid deserts that have more CO2 (rotting vegetation of the forest) are actually cooler than deserts. It is because GHG, aka moisture, is a coolant. And why is venus so hot? It has nothing to do with CO2 but is because gravity is high and the atmosphere is deep, i.e. W = F x D is a big number. It is just high school physics.

  6. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    I do something similar by showing it’s the monoatomics and homonuclear diatomics which are actually the “greenhouse” gases. For the same reason that they use a low-DOF monoatomic (Ar) as a filler gas to reduce energy transfer through a dual-pane window; and for the same reason they use a complex high-DOF CFC or HCFC molecule as a refrigerant to increase energy transfer from evaporator to condenser.

    7 – 13 µm: >280 K (near-surface).
    .>17 µm: ~260 – ~240 K (~5km in the troposphere).
    13 – 17 µm: ~220 K (near the tropopause).

    The emission profile is equivalent to a BB with a temperature of 255 K, and thus an effective emission height of 5.105 km.

    The lapse rate is said to average ~6.5 K / km. 6.5 K / km * 5.105 km = 33.1825 K. That is not the ‘greenhouse effect’, it’s the tropospheric lapse rate. The climate loons have conflated the two.

    Polyatomic molecules (CO2, H2O) reduce the adiabatic lapse rate (ALR), not increase it (dry ALR: ~9.81 K / km; humid ALR: ~3.5 to ~6.5 K / km) by dint of their higher specific heat capacity and/or latent heat capacity convectively transiting more energy (as compared to the monoatomics and homonuclear diatomics), thus attempting to reduce temperature differential with altitude, while at the same time radiatively cooling the upper atmosphere faster than they can convectively warm it… they increase thermodynamic coupling between heat source and sink… they are coolants.

    9.81 K / km * 5.105 km = 50.08005 K (dry adiabatic lapse rate, due to homonuclear diatomics and monoatomics), which would give a surface temperature of 255 + 50.08005 = 305.08005 K. Sans CO2, that number would be even higher.

    Water vapor (primarily) reduces that to 272.8675 K – 288.1825 K, depending upon humidity. Other polyatomics (CO2) contribute to cooling, to a lesser extent. The higher the concentration of polyatomics, the more vertical the lapse rate, the cooler the surface.

    It is the monoatomics and homonuclear diatomics which are the actual ‘greenhouse’ gases… remember that an actual greenhouse works by hindering convection.

    Monoatomics (Ar) have no vibrational mode quantum states, and thus cannot emit (nor absorb) IR. Homonuclear diatomics (O2, N2) have no net magnetic dipole and thus cannot emit (nor absorb) IR unless that net-zero magnetic dipole is perturbed via collision.

    In an atmosphere consisting of solely monoatomics and diatomics, the atoms / molecules could pick up energy via conduction by contacting the surface, just as the polyatomics do; they could convect just as the polyatomics do… but once in the upper atmosphere, they could not as effectively radiatively emit that energy, the upper atmosphere would warm, lending less buoyancy to convecting air, thus hindering convection… and that’s how an actual greenhouse works, by hindering convection.

  7. Hi Jo
    That is a great explanation of the issues facing the pseudoscience of the greenhouse effect. Could I have your permission to use it in a question on Stackoverflow.com earth science. I just love sticking it up those cunts.

  8. PETER BURNS says:

    Hi Josrph
    I have manu issues with this bazzare alarmist claim about slower cooling…….Most obvious being that emmisivety is the product of absorption….

    This being the case then if the Earth was slower at cooling then it would also not absorb the same amount of energy from the sun!!!…..It would absorb less beause (apparently) this slower cooling does not affect emmisivety…..

    So what they ad claiming is that an object that cools slowe than previous will stil absorb the same amount of enegy…….This is complete rubbish

  9. @ Joe:

    The cocksucker in the video is the Northern Territory leader who has just forced many of those same “vulnerable aboriginals” into quarantine camps against their will and reports are being circulated that a remote aboriginal community has now been force vaccinated against their will, by the Australian military.

    I’m losing my job at the end of the year for refusing the jab and most of us here in Oz who have refused it are forming neighbourhood networks now, in preparation to fight to the death when forced vaccination reaches the suburbs.

    Digital ID is next and carbon credits as well as vax status are to be combined.

  10. Jopo says:

    Hi wickedwenchfan
    Michael Gunner is a weak man. I cannot take that dickhead seriously. Worst Chief we have had up here in Darwin.

  11. Of course Malcolm!

  12. Gosh Stephen, I’ve been worried how you’re doing mate. May whatever powers in the universe stand with you. Love ya man. You ever want to chat, let me know. Resist to the end. I know I will. Death before submission. These are all the same fn people…flat earth climate alarmists etc…they’re aliens or something I swear.

  13. Joseph E Postma says:

    Look at this absolute retardation:


    The argument is that businesses should have absolute and total control over your health, whereas the government doesn’t have this right.

    Psycho clown world.

    All hail the pharmacological corporatocracy.

  14. Joseph E Postma says:

    You guys gotta admit – These people, like that retard in that video, they are just living their absolute best life right now, are they not?!

    I mean, these people must just be right at peak actualization in their hierarchy of development. This is peak experience for them…their best life.

    It’s cute. Sad and retarded, but cute.

  15. Saying “unvaccinated” is the same thing as saying “unPepsid” because a person doesn’t drink Pepsi. We don’t exist in relationship to corporations or businesses or products. I’m no more unpepsid than I am unvaccinated.

    Did you drink Pepsi in the last 6 months? No? Then you’re UNPEPSID!!!

  16. Rosco says:

    Simple – CO2 has a lower thermal conductivity than ordinary air !

    Air is almost twice as conductive as CO2 and air is an excellent thermal insulator – witness double glazing.

    The idiots that perform all sorts of experiments using lamps to heat thermometers in bottles with different gases inside are simply proving this every time but are so stupid they think it is back-radiation !

    And of course these have zero to do with any “greenhouse effect”.

    They seem to not understand that a thermometer directly irradiated by a hot source comes into an equilibrium with the heating power of the incident radiation minus the thermal conductivity of the surrounding atmosphere – be it ordinary air or CO2.

    In a little experiment I conducted years ago I was easily able to heat a thermometer to 48°C using 2 150 watt floodlights in a room where ambient air temperature was 18°C.

    The greenhouse advocates are stupid beyond belief – so what does that make politicians who buy this bullshit ?

    Fuckwits !

  17. Rosco says:

    I am anti COVID vaccines especially mRNA versions !

    However during my time as an Environmental Health Officer I personally organised mass vaccine clinics where thousands of people were vaccinate annually using well tested and proven vaccines.

    I regard my work in this as some of the most vitally important work I did.

    So no I am not an anti-vaxer – I am the complete opposite.

    But I will not touch the genetic engineering experiment materials masquerading as a vaccination program against COVID !

  18. Thanks Joe,

    Despite everything we are doing ok and well prepared for survival. I’m also looking forward to suing my employer and it’s storm troopers once they enforce the mandate. Not because I expect to win (courts are corrupt) but because the individuals will stress over the process and thus their cowardice and treachery is not without consequence

  19. boomie789 says:

    “But Polio went away right ? Thats because the vaccine !

    As mentioned above… it was actually due to better hygiene & clean drinking water from indoor plumbing. But also a few kike tricks have helped reduce numbers further.

    In 1958 paralytic poliomyelitis was redefined as aseptic meningitis thus decimating the fatal and severe cases of polio

    In India in 2011 it was found those vaccinated against polio were 6.26x more likely to become paralyzed than those who were not. Paralytic poliomyelitis can be brought on by pesticide or heavy metal exposure such as DDT or Lead.

    But what happens if you get one of those diseases you’ll die right?

    Absolutely not. If you have a healthy balanced diet rich of immumosupportive vitamins & minerals such as Zinc, Vitamin A & Vitamin C your body will be able to fight it off on its own.80% of acute measles cases with complications in South Africa were resolved by administering high dose vitamin A. ”

    Click to access Immunization-Graphs-RO-2009.pdf

  20. boomie789 says:

  21. boomie789 says:

  22. Absolutely boomie. All these common diseases were eradicated with hygiene and clean water. Vagzines came well after and then they simply lied and said the vaxs did it. There’s a whole alternative science to health which addresses causes rather just giving drugs to relieve symptoms etc.

  23. John Salamito says:

    @LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks
    Thanks, you are more expert then me. So you are saying that the dipolar molecules (CO2, H2O, etc) enable IR transmission that would otherwise not be there (if only O2, N2, etc). The IR to outer space lessens the lapse rate. (It is not due, as I said, to the energy lost by state transitions between gas H20 and liquid H2O). If there was only N2, O2 then the lapse rate would be 9.8, and the earth surface a toasty 305.08K. Unlike what I said, it is not the fact that it rains that make a difference (by absorbing energy in state transitions) but due to more IR from the GH gases?

    I thought that whatever IR comes in from Sun will also go back out from a mix of solids (earth), liquids (sea) and gas (troposphere). The mix does not matter, it works itself out. It does not matter what the atmosphere is, what matters is that there is an atmosphere – of any composition at all – because that allows Work to be done by Gravity. I think we agree this sentence ->Temperature is a combination of Solar IR plus Work from gravity (giving us 305K at the sea level) but GH gases cause a 37 degree cooling. The nuance I am unsure of is whether that cooling is due to energy lost in H2O changing state (liquid->gas->liquid) or due GH IR?

  24. boomie789 says:

    @LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks

    What do you think of this guy?

    Don’t feel compelled to answer I just want an excuse to post these anyway.

  25. boomie789 says:

  26. John Salamito says:

    Check out Theoria Apophasis on YouTube
    He would agree Feynman is clueless. Also Einstein. But Tesla knew.

  27. boomie789 says:

    I remember having a binge on him a long time ago, when I was still in high school . Him and Laurence Krauss, Richard Dawkins, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Carl Sagan, Michio Kaku, Brian Cox, all those celebrity scientist. Used to watch all their discussions and debates.

    I’ve lost a lot of respect for pretty much all of them over the years. Not that everything they say is wrong of course.

  28. boomie789
    Laurence Krauss, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Carl Sagan, Michio Kaku, Brian Cox are all propagandists of the climate religion with the exception of Richard Dawkins whom is an atheist of note. He denounces religion, as well he should, as religion is a disease of the mind, a delusional state that even today prevails. I am an Atheist from the age of 5 when I refused to go to Sunday School for fear of being indoctrinate by their delusions.

  29. John Salamito says:

    @malcolm hornsby
    I thought RD also supported global warming religion. You say not?

  30. CD Marshall says:

    I didn’t look at the video but fusion works…I mean literally every star in the universe proves it and something hotter than fusion made those stars…Or a different form of fusion?

  31. CD Marshall says:

    Now can we get fusion to work for us efficiently. Not with our present technology, apparently? The moon would be a great testing ground, or a just space for greater forms of energy without radiating the entire planet. Maybe someday.

  32. boomie789 says:

    @Malcolm Hornsby

    I was around 13, It was that Religious Movie by Bill Maher that did it it for me. I’m not such a staunch atheist anymore though. Pro-Christian/Pro-west Agnostic. Religion is a domestication tool, imo. It can be good or bad, depends on the domesticators.

    I will be on the battle field with the Christians, or thrown in the same mass grave with them. Not the evangelicals though, or those like them. They are traitors.

  33. boomie789 says:

    They’re are a lot of Christian traitors imo.

  34. boomie789 says:

    Well some religions are fundamentally evil, Christianity isn’t, and can be worked with, to an extent, imo.

    Kind of a playing the cards I’m dealt thing.

  35. Joseph E Postma says:

    Given that this journal doesn’t seem to have any publishing standards given this article of the OP, and not that this means that my own paper isn’t of a totally high standard, I tried submitting my paper to this journal. Less than a day, and no explanation given whatsoever, but it is rejected for the 13’th time.

    It seems that you cannot simply state some basic facts in any science journal any more, but of course you can publish absolute rubbish. They can’t tell me what’s wrong with my paper and why they won’t consider it…they just say no. The only time it was considered was at the AMS, as I recount in the AMS video, where one reviewer said the paper could be published right away, and the other reviewer said that I cannot publish that the Sun heats the Earth! The editor went with the latter. Other physics(!) journals I’ve submitted to have said that they’re not qualified(!) to assess what I am saying in my paper!

    The message I keep hearing inside, is: Why keep trying to publish your paper through a system you know to be totally illegitimate, such as to demonstrate that the system is not illegitimate? If you publish your paper through the fraudulent system, and if you keep demanding this, then you’re saying that the system you know is fraudulent must be responsible for providing legitimacy to yourself! I’m not being consistent.

    What I have done, however, is determine that the system is totally fraudulent, and of course that much I know, and of course that much is absolutely what my paper demonstrates and proves. Thus why would the fraudulent system publish your paper when your paper would destroy it?

    So I need your help and advice, fellows, all of you who know me and have been here:

    What should I do with that paper (which I read in the AMS video)? How can I still try to have it make an impact?

    Obviously, it is no longer about saving the whole system. It is not salvageable. The only thing I or we can do is give it to our side. Our side already knows for the most part what a fraud climate science is, but my paper can demonstrate for our side, and give our side the resolve and understanding, that the leftist/communist/insane/whatever system of scientism and politics is totally and utterly corrupt, and our only solution is to develop our own systems and simply move on and away from the stinking rotting corpse of this old system. I mean most of us are already there, but perhaps my paper can simply make the case so plainly and absolutely that it instills a steeled resolve in our folk.

    Should I publish it in a book? Should I publish it all over the web and all sites that I can? Should I use PSI? All of the above? Recite it again on YouTube?

    What do you fellows think?

    I mean it makes sense…why would I use an illegitimate system to demonstrate that the system is legitimate?

  36. boomie789 says:

    Keep trying to get on platforms and get interviews to spread your work. Especially the ones that speak to guys more like us. Like you did with Vincent James, that’s when I first saw you. Just keep chipping away at it every day little by little one by one. Maybe you will strike gold.

  37. boomie789 says:

  38. Joseph E Postma says:

    Hah boomie very nice. That’s me alright! Man you picked a good message for me right now.

  39. Jo I hear you mate. All I can suggest is to use your resources. You have a following of disciples sitting around waiting for your titbits of wisdom. Give them tasks and they will rejoice in the fruits on your table.

  40. boomie789 says:

    Short argument with Curt Doolitle on 9/11.

    Curt-“Of course I have. But do you have the knowledge and ability to know that it’s adequate and.. overwhelming.
    “This kind of thing is why I leave the right vox populi to others. It’s also why I want as little to do with the right fringe as possible. “Why do you think yuo’re competent to make that decision, and why do you think any number of others are competent to make that decision, when in any field it’s usually the top .001% of the members of the field that aren’t idiots?”

    go into that a little and share my 1 page disproof
    I bring up tower 7
    me- “Nothing hit it”
    Me- “You must not have seen the “top .001%” of climate scientists.”
    go into that a little and share my 1 page disproof

    Curt-“You are asserting that you are able to make that assessment.
    I’m asserting that I know how to make that assessment.
    I’m going to have to go with the fact that I have a much better understanding of engineering, architecture, load, and that everyone with a brain and competency came to the same conclusion.”

    Me-“Well agree to disagree. Unless you can convince me.”
    “I’m really dissapointed in the lack of an actual argument I must admit.”
    “Are you sure you’re smart enough to make that decision because I AM!”
    “wtf is that?”

    Had to remind myself of the understanding I gained on the Masculine-femininity spectrum and the Ascended male, dominate male stuff.
    Truth before face

    Also he recommends Peter Zeihan, who promotes “Guns Germs & Steel”, a book for retards.

  41. Curt a Doolittle was another false prophet that many of us fell for

  42. Joseph E Postma says:

    He can really disappoint.

    No one can make that assessment other than the experts who make obviously retarded assessments that even children can see…ugh.

    It get it – He’s all about the aristocracy, about the meritocracy and that only the best should lead…but he doesn’t seem to understand that even his own work demonstrates that there is no existing legitimate aristocracy that exists anywhere…anywhere, right now, at all, anywhere.

    So then he reduces to: “I am smart enough to see that the experts have the answer and not you even though I have never understood what the arguments are I just refer to authority.” So he defers to authority…the literally stupidest, most retarded fallacy of reasoning there is.

    His comments are excellent about the female mind vs. the male mind and Europe vs. the enemy of Europe. But then he says stupid shit like this and doesn’t engage rationally or meaningfully.

    Looks like we’ll need a higher synthesis.

  43. boomie789 says:

    “Cohen was born on September 21, 1934 in Westmount, Quebec, an English-speaking area of Montreal, into a middle-class Canadian Jewish family. His mother, Marsha (Masha) Klonitsky,[3] was the daughter of a Talmudic writer, Rabbi Solomon Klonitsky-Kline, of Lithuanian Jewish ancestry.[4][5] His paternal grandfather, whose family had moved from Poland to Canada, was Lyon Cohen, the founding president of the Canadian Jewish Congress. His father, Nathan Cohen, owned a substantial clothing store and died when Cohen was nine years old. The family observed Orthodox Judaism, and belonged to Congregation Shaar Hashomayim, to which Cohen retained connections all his life.[6] On the topic of being a Kohen, Cohen told Richard Goldstein in 1967, “I had a very Messianic childhood. I was told I was a descendant of Aaron, the high priest.”[7]”



  44. I would say, write another book Joe. This time focus less on the physics and devote your energy to explaining how the system is broken. What has become crystal clear over the last two years, is that the general public don’t care about facts. They only care about fitting in and avoiding conflict. We live in a selfish materialist world where the top priority is paying the mortgage or rent. The public don’t care about bigger issues as long as they can still get a pay cheque next week (and next year or ten years from now is too far ahead to worry about).

    I read the King James Version of the Bible from cover to cover between June of 2020 and June 2021. Of all the things we have been lied to about, we have been lied to most about what is in the Bible. Especially by pastors and priests from the pulpit. This is not a coincidence. Subvert a civilisation’s moral and spiritual foundation and core and you can subvert everything else that is down stream of that.


    There are no paradoxes in the universe. There is only human error and lies.

  45. Joseph E Postma says:

    Thanks Stephen!

    And very well said.

  46. Joseph E Postma says:

    I do have the outline and at least half of the text written for a 3rd book actually. Originally I wrote it after the AMS fiasco, and included the paper, but then thought I wanted to try for a while to get that paper published in a journal instead of the book because if it goes in the book then it can’t go in a journal.

    At this point it is clear that I shouldn’t even by trying to use an illegitimate system to do something legitimate! We need to go entirely independent with a new system, and discard the old one entirely.

    So yes…maybe I will finish the book then and include what I have found with these journals which STATE that they are not qualified to review whether the Earth is flat or round!! lol!! I have some really golden ridiculous reviewer comments now.

    I can also publish with PSI…and they wouldn’t care if I also put the paper in my 3rd book.

  47. Why not produce more videos 5 – 10 minutes each, every day every platform. Beat the media at their own game produce and produce, counter the propaganda Tony Haller style but better. Call on your disciples for content. They are your resource.

  48. boomie789 says:

    “I think it means exactly what it says. It is a terrorist song. I think it’s a response to terrorism. There’s something about terrorism that I’ve always admired. The fact that there are no alibis or no compromises. That position is always very attractive. I don’t like it when it’s manifested on the physical plane – I don’t really enjoy the terrorist activities – but Psychic Terrorism. I remember there was a great poem by (((Irving Layton))) that I once read, I’ll give you a paraphrase of it. It was ‘well, you guys blow up an occasional airline and kill a few children here and there’, he says. ‘But our terrorists, Jesus, Freud, Marx, Einstein. The whole world is still quaking.'”
    – Leonard Cohen on ‘First We Take Manhattan’

    source for the quote: https://web.archive.org/web/20100227015151/http://www.boelters.de/LC/OrigZit.html#f

  49. Stephen, I know it’s kinda a long book, but what would you say are the most important take aways for you from the KJV?

  50. boomie789 says:

    In response to the Langan tweet I shared.
    This is what started that little but revealing exchange. Still pondering it.
    Curt Doolittle,
    [In reply to Boomie]
    “You can’t confuse IQ with demonstrated intelligence, or demonstrated competence. It’s just the rate of neural connectivity. If you have to choose between the guy with 40 years of experience, and the guy with the IQ and no experience then the solution is almost always experience, because general knowledge doesn’t scale down (which is really obvious in economics.)”

    Curt Doolittle,
    “I don’t disagree with Langan on much but he has a woo woo need and he fills it. In other words, the same reason he anthropomorphizes and woo woo’s the universe and philosophy is the same reason he sees conspiracies where there are none (9/11) and where there are some (white replacement).”

    I wish I had a 200IQ. I don’t even think mine is that high to be honest. I didn’t do amazing on my SATs, above avg. I’d guess 105-115. I suppose I should take one. O man if I got a 90.

    If you don’t have a 140+IQ the next best thing is to make a bunch of 140+IQ friends. Then you can just repeat what they say and trick people into thinking you’re a genius 😁. If you want to soar with the eagles you can’t walk with the turkeys and all that

  51. boomie789 says:

    If you missed it.

    “Christopher Langan, a white Mexican-American, is generally considered to have the highest recorded IQ on earth – roughly around 195-210. He knows advanced maths, physics, philosophy, linguistics, has studied at Harvard and Cambridge – got his PhD there.

    Guess what? He fully believes that 9/11 was a staged attack by US-Israeli authorities. He believes in the great replacement and the genocide of whites. He believes that there is global Jewish conspiring. He has put forth a philosophical – logical proof of god. He fully opposes the vax.”

    Just read his Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Langan

  52. boomie789 says:

  53. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    John Salamito wrote:
    “Check out Theoria Apophasis on YouTube”

    No… no, no, no, no, no. I actually read his “book”… in the first 30 or so pages, I found so many fundamental errors that I wrote a really long debunking of his take on reality, said take which consists of equal parts co-option of Dollardian theory and Russellian theory, combined with redefinition of QM definitions,sprinkled with hubristic rants and filled with expletives and conspiracy theory.






    Ken Wheeler doesn’t have the answer. He has supposition, conflation

  54. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    The funniest bit from Wheeler was when he posted video “proof” of energy flowing off a bismuth sphere sitting next to a behemoth magnet by using a FLIR imager camera… except what he was seeing in his camera viewer was his own body heat reflecting off the sphere. Now, this is a guy who claims to be a camera ‘expert’… but he couldn’t figure it out. Just sayin’. LOL

  55. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    John Salamito wrote:
    “@LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks
    Thanks, you are more expert then me. So you are saying that the dipolar molecules (CO2, H2O, etc) enable IR transmission that would otherwise not be there (if only O2, N2, etc). The IR to outer space lessens the lapse rate. (It is not due, as I said, to the energy lost by state transitions between gas H20 and liquid H2O). If there was only N2, O2 then the lapse rate would be 9.8, and the earth surface a toasty 305.08K. Unlike what I said, it is not the fact that it rains that make a difference (by absorbing energy in state transitions) but due to more IR from the GH gases?

    I thought that whatever IR comes in from Sun will also go back out from a mix of solids (earth), liquids (sea) and gas (troposphere). The mix does not matter, it works itself out. It does not matter what the atmosphere is, what matters is that there is an atmosphere – of any composition at all – because that allows Work to be done by Gravity. I think we agree this sentence ->Temperature is a combination of Solar IR plus Work from gravity (giving us 305K at the sea level) but GH gases cause a 37 degree cooling. The nuance I am unsure of is whether that cooling is due to energy lost in H2O changing state (liquid->gas->liquid) or due GH IR?”

    No, not more expert… I’ve just had the opportunity to explore more, partly because of my own inquisitive nature and partly because I’m a contentious bastard who likes arguing with kooks online… some of them have pretty cleverly-constructed false realities which require being even more clever to deconstruct.

    It’s not the IR to space which lessens the lapse rate, it’s the fact that polyatomics have more DOF into which energy can be equipartitioned, thus they transit more energy from surface to upper atmosphere (as compared to the monoatomics and homonuclear diatomics), which would have the effect of warming the upper atmosphere if it weren’t for the fact that those same polyatomics are also radiative molecules and thus radiatively cool the upper atmosphere at a greater rate then they can convectively warm it.

    Get rid of those radiative polyatomic molecules, and the atmosphere cannot as effectively radiatively emit (there would be some emission from the homonuclear diatomics undergoing collisional perturbation of their net-zero magnetic dipole, but not nearly as much as from the polyatomics). Given that energy flux off-planet is a combination of surface radiant exitance and convection to / radiative emission from the upper atmosphere, if we remove the second component, the first must rise, which implies a warmer surface.

    Analogize the atmosphere to a dual-pane window… why don’t they fill the space between the two window panes with CO2 if it’s such a terrific ‘heat trapping’ gas? Why do they use a low-DOF monoatomic such as Ar?

    Analogize the atmosphere to an A/C system… water vapor acts as a literal refrigerant (in the strict ‘refrigeration cycle’ sense) below the tropopause.

    You know, the refrigeration cycle (Earth) [A/C system]:

    A liquid evaporates at the heat source (the surface) [in the evaporator], it is transported (convected) [via an A/C compressor], it emits radiation to the heat sink and undergoes phase change (emits radiation in the upper atmosphere, the majority of which is upwelling owing to the mean free path length / altitude / air density relation) [in the condenser], it is transported (falls as rain or snow) [via that A/C compressor], and the cycle repeats.

    That’s why water vapor is the predominant atmospheric radiative coolant below the tropopause, and CO2 is the predominant atmospheric radiative coolant above the tropopause. The only ‘warming’ by CO2 is a negligible warming at the tropopause due to CO2 absorbing a greater proportion of cloud-reflected solar insolation and radiation from cloud condensation.

    That’s from an atmospheric research scientist at NASA JPL.

    That’s from the Clough and Iacono study.

  56. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    Note that the Clough & Iacono study is for the atmospheric radiative cooling effect, so positive numbers at right are cooling, negative numbers are warming.

  57. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    Here’s an idea… to regulate “global temperature”, add or remove Ar. Higher Ar = higher temperature (both because it lessens the probability of the homonuclear diatomics undergoing t-v (translational-vibrational) collisions with polyatomics, and because it increases the depth of the atmosphere and hence extends the lapse rate ‘anchor’ point at TOA), lower Ar = lower temperature (for the same but vice-versa reasons as above).

    We need Ar emission limits! We need people asking “What is your Argon footprint?”! We need Ar credits! LOL

  58. My main take aways from first reading are 1) that history repeats. 2) a cohesive civilisation requires a unified religion upon which everyone in the governed area adhere to and generally believes in 3) different religions produce different outcomes for the citizens living under them. 4) Christianity when properly adhered to produces the most freedom and justice. 5) Without worship of God as the primary value for society, every other value is meaningless as they are all downstream from an authority whose morals are not up for negotiation. There is one truth, not ever changing opinions based on the ruler or powers of the day. 6) The fall of a civilisation takes an average of a few hundred years. “False gods” or no longer believing in God, or disobeying God gets a foothold and gradually causes moral decay. The process is cumulative and compounds over time. 7) the priests are always the first to become corrupt.

  59. Third book sounds pretty good to me. Put me down for a copy!

  60. John Salamito says:

    @ Klimate Katastrophe Kooks
    Thanks for steer in Wheeler.

    As to lapse rates etc in simple terms I think you’re saying that if we add CO2 then because the total irradiation is unchanged there must be more from Air and less from the Surface and thus it cools the surface.

  61. Jopo says:

    Hi guys,
    Stumbled or perhaps searched my way into this old paper located in the Dept of Energy USA website. Clearly a very old paper due to the SI units being used. Feet and pounds.
    Hopefully helpful to some. Certainly helpful to me and reinforcing all what Joe has to say.

    Here is the link and following is some extracts from that D.O.E piece.

    Click to access 2-Module%202-Heat%20Transfer.pdf

    Appears to be so much in here that refutes the way electromagnetic radiation works from the perspective of alarmist’s.
    Basically IR radiation is from HOT to COLD. It is spelt out in this piece. Well that is my interpretation.

    I want to say the science was settled back in the 70s. This paper seems to confirm that.

  62. boomie789 says:

    @LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks

    How old do you think the universe is?

  63. Joseph E Postma says:

    That’s a great resource you found there Jopo. The pages on heat, work, and transfer modes are excellent.

    I would say that his terminology goes off the rails at the last page you have posted there, though. It is actually similar to what LOL@KOOK has been saying. Heat is the flow due to temperature difference, but here the author’s idea of heat is with respect to space at 0K (and space doesn’t actually receive heat) and then that since this is assumed, then the cold body is said to send heat to the warm body, but the warm body sends back more. That’s not how heat works, and his latter statement is not consistent with his earlier one:

    “When a temperature difference exists across a boundary, […] the natural flow of energy is from the hotter body to the cooler body.”

    He should clarify that the flow of energy in this case is heat.


    “Heat is always transferred when a temperature difference exists between two bodies.”

    And heat goes from hot to cool, but then he says it goes both ways with the larger exceeding the smaller.

    You can get the point he’s trying to make, but he does it poorly, and now today, climate sophists will use terminology like that to pretend that the cold air making you and the surface cold is actually making you warmer, it is just that you are heating the air more than the air is heating you while you’re actually being reduced in temperature. lol

    HIs last paragraph should read: “All bodies above absolute zero temperature will radiate.”

    Whether or not their radiation can act as heat, i.e. perform work, on another body, depends on the other body’s temperature. He created a paradox where there is none.

    And in regards to space, where he is thinking that any thermal radiation emitted by a body must be considered heat to space, rather than simply energy to space, we must appreciate something which we saw re-developed in the comments here over the last year: since space cannot change temperature, and one cannot move space or perform work upon in, then space cannot receive heat. It is incorrect to say that, with respect to space at 0K, all bodies radiate heat into it – that’s not correct.

  64. boomie789 says:

    “EU set to propose nine-month limit on validity of COVID-19 vaccines”

  65. Joseph E Postma says:

    There was a movement going around about a decade ago, something about Digital Rights Protection or something. Yes, we need to keep our data out of the hands of these companies.

    For these psychopaths, it doesn’t matter if it is a human or a robot purchasing their products, as long as they’re being purchased. And in fact, they would ABSOLUTELY PREFER it was robots purchasing their products, because you can completely control that. They want Idiocracy but where people are mindless automatons, or just robots. For these psychotic materialists, there’s no difference between a robot and a human anyway…it is all just random matter doing random things magically…but it better be buying your products! Matter exists to buy your products, and there’s nothing else. That’s existence. Matter buying products, due to “emergence”. Matter magically created mind so that mind could buy products, and then matter realized it doesn’t need mind to buy products so got rid of mind and kept buying products.

    And yah…that’s the other part of it…immune system as subscription service. No different than a scheduled oil change every 5000 miles because the human is just a machine anyway and there is no mind or soul or anything anyway. Trust us…your body needs continuous maintenance to survive…nothing to do with diet or lifestyle…here just eat this Fast Food(TM) and we’ll take care of your body for you, robot.

  66. John Salamito says:

    To clarify, so a warm body sitting 0K infinite space will lose energy to that space, but heat nothing. So it does fall in temperature, but without anything else being warmed?

  67. boomie789 says:

    Been keeping this in mind too.
    The vaccine loses valididy every 9 months ey?

  68. boomie789 says:

    Well the sun doesn’t fall in temperature necessarily

  69. boomie789 says:


  70. Joseph E Postma says:

    @John – 2021/11/25 at 12:25 PM

    “To clarify, so a warm body sitting 0K infinite space will lose energy to that space, but heat nothing. So it does fall in temperature, but without anything else being warmed?”

    It won’t heat space. Right, it can lose energy, but if there’s nothing else around, then of course nothing can be heated.

  71. Joseph E Postma says:

    “the sun doesn’t fall in temperature necessarily”

    Right, it has a continuous and steady power source.

  72. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    boomie789 wrote:
    “@LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks

    What do you think of this guy?”

    I’ve only viewed his “The Charm quark is nonsense” video (I’ve not checked his maths, though) and his “Feynman didn’t know how magnets work” video and read one of his papers, so I don’t have much to go on, but what he states in those videos seems pretty well-based in physics, he doesn’t appear to be denying fundamental physical laws, claiming odd conspiracies, redefining common definitions or attempting to take credit for discoveries made by others (ala Wheeler), he appears to be attempting to take what we already know and boil it down to what makes sense.

    The “particle zoo” (creating a new particle for every single resonance observed) is overly-complicating, especially when Occam’s Razor suggests that a great majority of these particles actually consist of combinations of other particles (just as, for example, a proton is composed of a combination of 2 Up quarks and one Down quark; whereas the neutron consists of 1 Up quark and 2 Down quarks, which is why a free neutron will beta decay into a proton and W- boson (one of the Down quarks decays into the W- boson, converting the Down quark into an Up quark, turning the neutron into a proton), then the W- boson decays into an electron and electron antineutrino).

    And he’s right… Feynman didn’t know how magnets actually produce the effects they do, partly because he was blinded by the Copenhagen Interpretation’s “Shut Up And Calculate” approach which just wanted to utilize mathematical formalism to arrive at results, not explanations of how that result came about. Fortunately, we’re moving beyond the Copenhagen Interpretation slowly but surely.

    For those who claim that Feynman was anti-Copenhagen, he wasn’t. That’s an historical distortion from Hsu. Feynman struggled with quantum mechanics for 5 years and in the end he hoped that his path integral formalism would replace standard theory. He was disappointed when he understood that his formalism was equivalent to the standard theory Copenhagen Interpretation.

    And Fleming is right… the mass of the proton and electron are equal to the quantum vacuum energy excluded by that proton or electron, and using the vacuum energy density equation and particle diameters, the proton:electron mass ratio is easily derived, as Fleming discusses in his paper “Proton and electron mass derived as the vacuum energy displaced by a Casimir cavity“. Gravitoelectromagnetism analogizes electromagnetism to General Relativity, mass ’causes’ gravity via a curvature of the geodesic 4-dimensional spacetime, mass is a manifestation of a particle’s rejection of quantum vacuum wavemodes, again all working via stress-energy tensor of the quantum vacuum.

    So we’re sniffing around the edges of the underlying reality of the universe, and Fleming appears to be attempting to get at that reality via reductionist means.

    I’ll have to dig into his videos to see if he has any Ken Wheeleresque odd-hobby-theory tics.

    But I will say that I’ve stated pretty much the same as regards magnets. Magnets (and matter, and radiation… pretty much all non-gravitational fields) exhibit their effects via a stress-energy tensor interaction with the quantum vacuum, creating essentially a ‘hill’ or a ‘valley’ of energy density (a gradient) which repulses or attracts, respectively.

    That’s kind of why photons cannot flow up an energy density gradient unless external energy does work to push that system energy up that gradient… 2LoT in a nutshell.

  73. boomie789 says:

    I knew this Fleming guy was worth paying attention to.

  74. KookTardsInc@yahoo.com says:

    boomie789 wrote:
    “@LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks

    How old do you think the universe is?”

    Wow, what a loaded question!

    It depends upon the geometry of the universe as a whole… except we can’t see the entire universe, we can only see out to our cosmological particle horizon, and what we can see is geometrically flat (ie: the angles of a triangle add up to 180 degrees, and the area of a circle is πr^2). Whether it is actually geometrically flat, or so large that we can’t detect any curvature within our cosmological particle horizon is an unknown that will remain unknown.

    Note that geometrically “flat” in this context doesn’t mean “flat” like a sheet of paper… that sheet of paper can be rolled into a cylinder and still be considered geometrically “flat”.

    If that cylinder was flexible enough that the ends of that cylinder could be attached to each other to form a torus, that would still be considered geometrically “flat”. If that torus was small enough, you could look out into space and see Earth in an earlier timeframe. Multiple earths at multiple timeframes, actually.

    But if we do live in a torus-shaped universe, it’s so large that any repeating patterns are beyond our cosmological particle horizon, so we can’t see them.

    If the universe is geometrically flat, and dominated by ordinary and dark matter, the Hubble constant inferred age would be ~9 billion years, shorter than the age of the oldest stars! So obviously, we’ve measured something inaccurately.

    WMAP determined the age of the universe to be 13.77 ± 0.059 billion years based upon matter and energy density and universal expansion rate, but that’s again only out to our cosmological particle horizon and is predicated upon that expansion (and its first derivative, acceleration) being a known quantity throughout the history of the universe (or that remains unchanged from what it is today throughout the history of the universe).

    So… hard to tell.

  75. boomie789 says:

    Ray Fleming thinks the universe is infinitely old and infinitely large. Also, he brings up an experiment that proves that new matter can be generated from the quantum field. So the universe isn’t going to eventually cool and leave nothing but black holes.

    He says that space can’t expand and the universe isn’t expanding either. This guy blows my mind. He has a bunch of videos poking holes in the big bang too.

  76. boomie789 says:

    ^ This is the experiment to prove that matter can still be made at all times in the universe.

    Alright, that’s enough I guess, and the others I linked above.

    Also, I just downloaded Grammarly to help me with my grammar. 😁

    Works pretty well.

  77. boomie789 says:

    Wait, I think I remember him saying it’s at least a trillion years old.

    Somewhere between a trillion and infinity, lol.

  78. Existence in and of itself is infinitely old. This universe is a temporary construct and has a finite lifetime. The universe is not synonymous with existence in the way that science thinks of it. The universe is the domain of Becoming, of change, entropy, matter, extension and time, and the finite. The material extended universe reincarnates as do human lives/souls.

  79. boomie789 says:

    My view is that we are finite in an infinite universe. Like the Oppenheimer Ranch guy 😑. The only way you get to reincarnate is through your offspring. When your line ends you are gone forever.

    As I’ve said before I think of the universe as cold and uncaring. Like a harsh frontier that must be dominated by a strong will. The strong earn the right to go on and the weak die. There is no literal spirit watching rooting you on. Likewise, there is no literal demon trying to harvest your lifeforce.

    This is all just the way it is. Adapt or die.

    The only God is natural law and physics.

    I need to read Langan’s proof for God though, I wonder if I’d like it.

  80. boomie789 says:

    The Native Americans are practically gone and nothing will ever bring them back. This is the fate of the weak.

  81. Joseph E Postma says:

    Boomie you should read the God series by Hockney…it explains all of these questions and will be to your liking.

    The question we’re all really asking is: What exists, and what is it made of?

    What is reality in and of itself made of? Base reality. What is it made of and what are its properties, and why is it this and not something else?

    Then everything else begins to fall into place.

    It doesn’t answer anything to have a proof for the existence of God. For what is God made of? How did it come to be? What does it do? How does it work? Etc.

    What we want to know is the functional, mechanical reasons for why existence exits, and what it is made out of, and that includes “God”.

    Once you know what base existence is, then everything else finally has somewhere to fall into place to.

    Yes, that is true about the Natives. And there are those who would see that for the European as well.

    Science says that all that exists is matter. But of course space and time exist too, and science simply assumes the existence of these as if they’re to be taken for granted. It doesn’t care to answer what space is and what time is ontologically. But when you get to base existence, then indeed you can explain what matter is, and you can also explain what space and time are, and how they all fall in together.

    What exists? Sure, you can call it God. But what does that actually fill in for you? It depends on your personality type. For some, the mere idea of a proof of God is sufficient answer for absolutely everything. They don’t care to actually mechanically define God, and understand how to engineer it and manipulate it, etc. So you can call it God and stop there. But we can also go on to understand precisely what existence is ontologically, how it works, why it works that way, and how to engineer it. But only some personality types are willing to go that far…the INTJ’s and INTP’s mainly.

  82. Joseph E Postma says:

    Start here, read the titles called “The God Series” starting from Book 1:

    The philosophy and mathematics discussions are excellent, and has all the answers. Unfortunately they get way too egalitarian at some points and it gets difficult to read, although at other points they speak extremely highly of fascism and are totally opposed to multiculturalism, etc. They actually end up being totally split on politics and it becomes quite annoying to read them contradict themselves on political matters…but nevertheless, the philosophy on the nature of existence is the best you will find anywhere, and it isn’t just some guy’s made up BS but is a distillation of all of our known philosophers of the past and put them all into a context to unify it all, under a single concept to explain all of reality in a logical mechanical mechanistic manner…not mean mechanistic in terms of robotic and devoid of life and mind and soul, but mechanistic in terms of a logic of cause and effect, that if you understand the premises then the rest follows obviously, etc.

  83. Joseph E Postma says:
  84. boomie789 says:

    Yea I wish they had those on audio I would tear through them at lightspeed. Put it on while I’m driving. I did read one of them but it wasn’t a Hockney one.

    I do have them downloaded on my phone ready for deer season. Sadly I might not even get to go this year. To much work.

    Thanks for reminding me.

    As promised, here are your results:

    Personality type: Logician (INTP-T)
    Traits: Introverted – 82%, Intuitive – 81%, Thinking – 71%, Prospecting – 60%, Turbulent – 51%
    Role: Analyst
    Strategy: Constant Improvement

  85. boomie789 says:

    Wait, I think Ray Fleming said 100 trillion years- infinite. I don’t remember what video he says it in though.

  86. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    Joe Postma wrote:
    “His last paragraph should read: “All bodies above absolute zero temperature will radiate.””

    I have a different take on it. For a graybody object which is below the temperature of the ambient, 2LoT dictates that the object cannot emit.

    Remember that photons are quanta of energy formed in response to an electromagnetic field gradient. Remember also that photons are an electromagnetic phenomenon. Also remember that photons are merely persistent perturbations above the EM field ambient energy density. If ambient chemical potential is higher than the object’s chemical potential, an emitted photon would have a negative chemical potential… it could not be emitted.

    Idealized blackbody objects assume 0 K ambient and ε=1 at all times. Idealized blackbody objects > 0 K emit. They emit without regard to ambient temperature, equivalent to emitting to 0 K. Thus they maximally emit at all times. Of course, they also don’t exist… they’re idealizations.

    Graybody objects, however, emit when their temperature exceeds ambient temperature (or the temperature of another object). In effect, we’ve taken the fixed 0 K floor of an idealized blackbody object and switched it for a ‘moving’ floor which can move up and down with the ambient temperature.

    So by stating that all objects > 0 K emit, you’re playing right into the hands of the climastrologists… remember that they calculate radiant exitance for graybody objects as though they’re idealized blackbody objects (emission to 0 K), just with ε < 1 (sometimes… the Kiehl & Trenberth Energy Balance graphic treated a graybody planet as though it emitted to 0 K and with ε = 1). Their calculating thusly inflates radiant exitance far above what it actually is, so they carry that error forward through their calculations and subtract a fictive ‘cooler-to-warmer’ energy flow from the real (but inflated because it’s calculated for emission to 0 K) ‘warmer-to-cooler’ energy flow to balance the equation. That’s how they arrive at their conclusion that energy can flow ‘cooler-to-warmer’.

    The circuit simulator:

    Idealized blackbody object:
    q = σ T^4
    Analogized to electrical theory, that’s akin to shunting current to ground (ie: 0 K) without any resistance (ie: ε=1) for each object. The two voltage sources (ie: thermodynamic objects) do not interact.

    Climastrologist object:
    q = ε σ T^4
    Analogized to electrical theory, that’s akin to shunting current to ground (ie: 0 K) with a resistance (ie: ε< 1) for each object. The two voltage sources (ie: thermodynamic objects) do not interact. (top two circuits in circuit simulator)

    Graybody object:
    q = ε σ (T_h^4 – T_c^4) A_h
    Analogized to electrical theory, that’s akin to putting both voltage sources (ie: both thermodynamic objects) into a system where they’re forced to interact (ie: emission to > 0 K), with a resistance (ie: ε<1) for each object. (bottom circuit in circuit simulator)

    The S-B equation for graybody objects isn’t meant to be used to subtract a fictive ‘cooler to warmerenergy flow from the incorrectly-calculated and thus too high ‘warmer to coolerenergy flow, it’s meant to be used to subtract cooler object energy density (temperature is a measure of energy density, the fourth root of energy density divided by Stefan’s constant) from warmer object energy density. Radiant exitance of the warmer object is predicated upon the energy density gradient.

    e = T^4 a
    a = 4σ/c
    e = T^4 4σ/c
    T^4 = e/(4σ/c)
    q = ε σ (T^4_h – T^4_c)
    q = ε σ (e_h/(4σ/c) – e_c/(4σ/c))

  87. My J & P are very fluid…depending on the info at hand and actionability. I can be one or the other.

  88. TEWS_Pilot says:

    This may not be the right article for posting this comment, but most of you are familiar with fellow commenter “Topher Field,” who is fighting the good fight to help free Australia from tyranny. In case you missed it, here is his speech from the large protest that took place recently in Melbourne. If you are able, please consider contributing to the production of the documentary he is filming. One way to do so is to buy one of his shirts:

    Hi supporter,
    Thank you to everyone who was a part of our history-making day on Saturday!
    All I can say is WOW!
    It’s a moment I’ve hoped for since this battle began, but to see it actually happening in front of me… it took about three days for it to actually sink in that it had really happened!
    In Freedom,
    Topher Field.
    PO Box 470 Hawthorn, VIC 3122 Australia

    If you couldn’t make it, or were too far from the stage to hear, this is what I said when it was my time to speak to the gargantuan crowd:

  89. Zelator says:

    Go Australia. We are with you brothers and sisters from UK.

    Fuck your corrupt politicians and talking heads.

    From the greatest rock band ever to rock the face of the planet …..Australians very own AC/DC… Axe Masters!!!!!!!

    Fuck em.

    Dirty Deeds …….Done Dirt Cheap

  90. TEWS_Pilot says:

    We Shall Overcome…..

  91. boomie789 says:

  92. boomie789 says:

  93. Can definitely relate to my J/P split on that!

  94. boomie789 says:


    “The Biden administration this week brazenly announced its intention to walk over China’s red line warning on Taiwan. The move by the US is a recklessly provocative step that dares an inevitable military response from Beijing.”

  95. boomie789 says:

    I think multiverse theory just exists in people’s heads though.

  96. boomie789 says:

    I have a correction.

    “nah, this is not the guy who committed suicide, it’s another. the guy who committed suicide was not a doctor but an engineer and head business manager of the hospital”


    Im Jahr 2009 kam der Diplom-Ingenieur und promovierte Volkswirt von den Berliner DRK-KIiniken nach Heilbronn

    Translation: In the year 2009 came the Diploma-carrying Engineer and promoted Economist from Berlin’s DRK-Clinics to Heilbronn

  97. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    John Salamito wrote:
    “To clarify, so a warm body sitting 0K infinite space will lose energy to that space, but heat nothing. So it does fall in temperature, but without anything else being warmed?”

    The object falls in temperature because it’s losing energy, temperature is a measure of energy density, lower energy density denotes lower temperature….

    Temperature is equal to the fourth root of energy density divided by Stefan’s Constant (ie: the radiation constant).

    e = T^4 a
    a = 4σ/c
    e = T^4 4σ/c
    T = 4^√e/(4σ/c)
    T^4 = e/(4σ/c)

    You’ll note that energy density (and thus temperature using the Kelvin scale) has its base at 0 K. Energy density at 0 K is zero, thus temperature at zero energy density is, of course, 0 K.

    q = ε σ (T^4_h – T^4_c)

    ∴ q = ε σ ((e_h / (4σ / c)) – (e_c / (4σ / c))) A_h

    Canceling units, we get J sec-1 m-2, which is W m-2 (1 J sec-1 = 1 W).
    W m-2 = W m-2 K-4 * (Δ(J m-3 / (W m-2 K-4 / m sec-1)))

    ∴ q = ε c (e_h – e_c) / 4

    Canceling units, we get J sec-1 m-2, which is W m-2 (1 J sec-1 = 1 W).

    W m-2 = m sec-1 (ΔJ m-3) / 4

    … without anything else being warmed yet… that energy is in transit. Eventually it’ll incide upon something and either be absorbed or reflected (depending upon the chemical potential of the photons and the object upon which those photons incide… if object chemical potential exceeds photon chemical potential, then the photon must be reflected… if energy density of the object incided upon exceeds the energy density of the object which emitted that photon, that photon will be reflected… remember that a warmer object will have higher energy density at all wavelengths than a cooler object).

    Remember that EM radiation is an entropic temporal process (ie: it obeys ΔS = ΔQ / T, and photons take time to travel)… so eventually something will be warmed by that photon, just not right away. If, as in your example, there is 0 K infinite space, that photon will just continue traveling, carrying with it the energy emitted by the emitting object (and the information about that emitting object).

  98. The planet is literally under attack.

  99. boomie789 says:

    I joined a discord learning about the 16 personality types. You can pick what personality you are and see everyone else’s type they picked. Guess who is the majority? INTP. Guess who is in second? INTJ. Want to know 3rd? INFJ, the rarest.

  100. boomie789 says:

    Correction, INFP is 3rd.
    INFJ is 4th

  101. boomie789 says:

    INFP =1363
    INFJ = 966

  102. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    I’m ISTP-A, but I don’t know if that’s good or bad. Guess it depends upon the situation. Not putting much stock in so-called ‘experts’ (who thus far have proven they possess little ‘expertise’), I put even less stock in psychology, which seems to be mostly subjective.

  103. boomie789 says:

    INFP =1363=12.97%
    INFJ = 966=9.19%

    got bored after this far

  104. boomie789 says:

    I don’t think it works like that, good or bad. I’m interested at least. Not sure how valuable this information is though.

    “Virtuosos love to explore with their hands and their eyes, touching and examining the world around them with cool rationalism and spirited curiosity. People with this personality type are natural Makers, moving from project to project, building the useful and the superfluous for the fun of it, and learning from their environment as they go. Often mechanics and engineers, Virtuosos find no greater joy than in getting their hands dirty pulling things apart and putting them back together, just a little bit better than they were before.”

  105. boomie789 says:

    “i won’t argue that several in this server are mistyped, but consider some factors/stats

    according to the table, i will bring up the INFJ case of 1.5% (more or less as of 2021, must consider several mistyped people) of general population is still 117 mllion ish if you do the maths, which is quite staggering still . in this server, INFJ population is 966 which is 0.000826% of general world population (rounded up).

    so the chances of this server having lots of these “rarer” types aren’t really that dramatic, especially if you consider the fact that the top 4 popular types within this server are introverted intuitives – in my theory i think introverts and intuitives are more drawn towards personality theory, which isn’t an hard objective fact but we can observe this server having intuitives as over 80% as its server population (i am estimating from your statistic, if you put it in calculator it will be somewhere around there), which is also an interesting statistic to consider .

    that is my analysis – essentially i do not think Love Who having majority “rarer” types (of which happen to be introverted intuitives) is too surprising”


  106. boomie789 says:

    That last bit he is saying introverted intuitives like to be rare.

  107. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    Hey, I just found out something neat… if you’re connecting to the internet by tethering your cell phone’s 4G or 5G connection to your computer via WiFi, you likely have a limit on the amount of data you can transit to WiFi tethered devices before it’s rate-limited… in my case, it was rate-limited to 128 kbps once I’d reached my limit.

    How does the phone company distinguish between data going to your phone and data that’s being transited to WiFi tethered devices? Although some do deep-packet inspection, that’s computationally expensive and prone to false positives. Most just check packet TTL (Time-To-Live).

    Both Android and Apple phones have a TTL of 64, so if you set your WiFi-tethered computer to have a TTL of 65, the phone company checking TTL can’t distinguish between packets from your phone and those from your WiFi-tethered devices (because packets from your phone have TTL=64, whereas those from your computer have TTL = 64 (65 minus one stripped off by the phone)).

    So rather than 128 kbps, I’m getting upwards of 6 Mbps steady-state (for large downloads) and peaks of up to 48.6 Mbps.

  108. boomie789 says:

    Well I didn’t last long in that server. I tried to help that German guy with his English and I guess it was interpreted as bullying.

    I didn’t get banned I just left. I was even complimenting him on knowing more than one language.


  109. boomie789 says:

    O nvm I’m the idiot. I miss interpreted him.

    I should go to bed.

  110. boomie789 says:

    I went back in the server and apologized to him for being a moron. Then left again, Lol, I’m embarrassed.

    I might join again later.

  111. Zelator says:

    This is a great article, which sounds eerily similar to what Kleck has been saying all along:


    Epstein wanted to impregnate thousands of women and create a master race.


    Klaus Schwab “You will own nothing and be happy”. This is truly the Illuminati at work.
    Well actually it’s the Black Sun. There is a mild distinction.

    Twitter analyst @APhilosophae wrote that BlackRock is the worlds largest asset manager and the leading proponent of The Great Reset.


    The Great Reset is a Black Sun project (the opposing side to the Rothschilds) of the World Economic Forum.
    Using Nesara/Gesara/Trumpsara which is trying to re-use the Metatron Black Cube AI along with Starlink, that was vacated by Pindars Death.
    Trump wanted to be the new Pindar but the Chair of Destiny refused him.

    Rothschilds needed a gatekeeper ( Black Sun person) to lock and key the system.

    Rothschilds controlled the front system ( the Blackscreen which produces the archons).

    The Black sun threatened that if they were not in control of the back system by 2019 then they would release a virus. This was because the Black Mirror stopped producing archons to infect us with.
    Covid was a back engineerded archon 2.0. created by Dr Mengel’s prodigal sons. This is the vaccine. The vaccine wasnt made for covid, the covid disease was created for a vaccine; once you understand that, everything else will make perfect sense.

    The Rothschilds/Bloodlines are the main faction behind reducing the population by 95%.
    One wants a One World Order and the Other wants a New World Order. There is a crossover in their means.

    They both promote the abolition of private property by 2030, under the guise or fighting climate change, Klaus Schwab its founder
    saying “you’ll own nothing and be happy.” Klaus Schwab is also Black Sun.


    In 1994 160 Nations Agreed to Reduce the World Population to 800 Million by 2030



    Wuhan Lab is Black Sun: Wuhan extracts loosh (Via the plasma plane and the solar plexus) and opens up a portal and sells it to Abraxas and Draco. Archon programs, Crispr, MRna genetic engineering are all run out of Wuhan.

    Most people associate the term ARCHON with a malevolent evil entity like an alien. ( Archons and Phosters) it is actually an acronym. It’s an etherical parasite like I’ve explained in previous posts. They are not a natural thing as in naturally organically occurring but a synthetic Artificial Intelligence. i.e Architecture for Cooperative Heterogenes Online Systems = (Part of Metatron System).

    I believe Trump is Black Sun and neither faction has humanity’s welfare at heart. His talking heads are probably Black Sun too. The Black Sun are in Control of the Jesuits as well and Skull and Bones (e.g Kerry).

    This is their website.

    http://senatusconsultum.eu ( Order of Assassins).

    There are the Illuminati under this faction as well and their main HQ is UK.*** They have acccess to some serious military hardware and are probably part of the Jason Society and MJ12. The Illuminati are anti-bloodline i.e anti Jewish. Bobby Fischer was supposedly their Grandmaster, and was the mastermind behind 911 to inplicate the Zionists according to book 666.
    Fischer although his parents were Jews denied himself to be Jewish and despised the Jews.


    ***n.b There appears to be two Illuminatis. One dating back to Pythagoras and called the Gnostic Pythagorian Illuminati, and a much older illuminati dating back pre roman times to Babylon hence the God/Kings/Pharaohic Bloodlines Divine Right to Rule, the one Leo Zagami talks about.
    Zagami also claims to be behind 911, but maybe this is SPARTACUS?

    Hence the Gnostic Illuminati war against Bloodline control is spurious and for their benefit and not humanities.The similarities outweigh the distinctions, so much so I would generally call them all Black Sun.

    Look there are at least two main factions vying for control (I will summarise them as the Black Sun and the Bloodlines aka the Zionist Jewish faction of the Khazarian Mafia). Bloodlines are also called the Sons of Belial. These are the Rothschilds the Rockerfellers and the Black Nobility families, that right to rule due to their bloodline. Based in Octagon Switzeralnd. Behind covid, 911 and fukashima. However they both pull off false flag gladio operations and blame each other. At the very top there is no such division.





    For Those About to Rock (We Salute You)!!!!!!!!!!!! Yes we do …..Fire

    AC/DC – For Those About to Rock (We Salute You) (Live At River Plate, December 2009).

  112. Zelator says:

    Morning Joe, when you get a chance can you check your moderation queue, as I posted a fairly lengthy post that went into moderation just now. Thanks. Z.

  113. Zelator says:

  114. Zelator says:

    Cheers Mate

  115. boomie789 says:

  116. boomie789 says:

  117. boomie789 says:

    Alt link(https://files.catbox.moe/6rv30z.mp4)

    Another interesting clip from that movie. Couldn’t find it on YouTube so I recorded it myself.
    Damn, what an imaginative and prophetic film. I liked it.
    7/10 in practice, 10/10 in spirit.
    Lots of subtle brilliance that seems like it was made for people in the know.
    Makes me think George Lucas is based.

  118. What do you say are the best messages or themes or concepts from it?

  119. boomie789 says:

    The controlled Opposition guy with the big nose. The power of love and hate. The power of a man with nothing to lose and everything to gain. Death is better than slavery. The way people are so controlled they don’t even really need walls, because no one even tries. Some one actually trying at all is 1 in a million. Man so much.

    I don’t want to give away the ending.

    What do you think?

  120. I’m gonna find it and watch it again. Too long ago since I watched it and know so much more now.

  121. boomie789 says:

    I wish it had solutions and was more hopeful and triumphant. Admittedly it is just a nightmare on film. Depressing.

  122. boomie789 says:

    Damn, I kind of want you to delete that. The film is a lot better if you have no idea the type of ending it will have. Shouldn’t have said that.

  123. I saw thus first so I deleted the previous without reading it 😆

  124. justgivemeall says:

    Boomie love that statement People don’t need walls. We put up our own walls and has never been more obvious than now. The irrational fear of catching a flu with a 99.8 percent chance of survival has put society in perspective for me,there are only a few of us with any real critical thinking skills. I have thought since my twenties that only about 10 % of the population were very bright,I now realize that it really is not stupidity but insanity. When they were told two and done most ran out and took the poison,now can hardly wait to get their third. That is the very definition of insanity.

  125. boomie789 says:

  126. Zelator says:

    Just watched that film “THX 1138”. It’s like a futuristic mix of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Midnight Express and Escape from NY.

    Disturbing mental scenes of mans’ wafer thin balance between sanity and insanity, morality and immorality and the matrix prison of the mind that reduces the body to a piece of meat, and a means to inflict pain and suffering.

    It’s interesting that the Donald Pleasence character and others are so afraid of freedom that they opt for their current circumstances.

    It’s dystopian scfi that is easy to imagine in reality if we go down the line we are currently heading.

  127. Zelator says:

  128. Zelator says:

    Here we go again; Omicron the new bug on the block.


    Is this the final armageddon? Where all vestiges of freedon are finally extinguished? If so we need to win this one. Big time.


  129. boomie789 says:

    Who regulates the regulators? I don’t trust this guy at all. Electric vehicles are wasteful and inefficient. It’s such a forced industry IMO.

  130. boomie789 says:


    Posting for satirical purposes only. This is just a joke. 😉😁

  131. boomie789 says:

    Lol, cmon, no such thing as outer space?

  132. boomie789 says:

  133. boomie789 says:

    Also to clarify, flat earthers are mentally ill people with absent fathers and abandonment issues.

  134. Truth. Explains Owen Benjamin, though I do like a lot of his perspectives…just not that one!

  135. boomie789 says:


    “American students grow up inundated with Holocaust movies, books, and education from grade school on up. American states like Florida even pass laws mandating Holocaust education for our children. So why are we not learning about the Holodomor?

    Perhaps even worse: why is Holodomor Denial allowed while if you question any part of the Holocaust narrative you could land in jail across many European countries.”

  136. boomie789 says:

  137. MP says:

    A black Magick trick is being played in the hospital vaxxed and not vaxxed data and the hospital covid positive tested or not data

    This is done in at least USA, Canada, Australia, UK, Netherlands

    2 simple retorical questions vs by example the minister of health will bust the whole scam

    Question 1: Are people considered partly or fully vaxxed after 2 weeks of the last injection?

    Question 2: Do recently injected people have a high chance of creating spike proteins, and by that a high chance of tesing positive?

    If those 2 questions are yes, then de data is muddered with a reverse data count trick

    According to VEARS vax side effect data most short term vax side effects are in the first 2 weeks. Those people will be put in the not vaxxed group, and also probably test positive

    That is why the big changes in vax vs not vaxxed stats monthly once the monthly vax amounts slow down in certain age groups

    I got quite some data to back this up, and try to make meme of it comming days

    This is done in at least USA, Canada, Australia, UK, Netherlands

    2 simple retorical questions vs by example the minister of health will bust the whole scam

    Question 1: Are people considered partly or fully vaxxed after 2 weeks of the last injection?

    Question 2: Do recently injected people have a high chance of creating spike proteins, and by that a high chance of tesing positive?

    If those 2 questions are yes, then de data is muddered with a reverse data count trick

    According to VEARS vax side effect data most short term vax side effects are in the first 2 weeks. Those people will be put in the not vaxxed group, and also probably test positive

    That is why the big changes in vax vs not vaxxed stats monthly once the monthly vax amounts slow down in certain age groups, it crawls to same effected as not once the vaxxes are amost

    I got quite some data graphs and quotes to back this up, and try to make meme of it comming days

  138. MP says:

    Oeps double pasted. Please eddit and skip half of it JP

  139. boomie789 says:

  140. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    The shipping containers are packed, we’re sleeping on the floor tonight, tomorrow we put the odds-n-ends into boxes and shove the boxes into the one shipping container with space left, then the containers get picked up sometime tomorrow afternoon. Then we leave out early Tuesday morning, escaping the loony bin of California and migrating to Texas… while we still can. This Omicron variant Wuhan virus is likely to so trigger the frothing-at-the-mouth libtards that they’ll lock down the border eventually (just not the southern border… unvaccinated, untested, illegals can flow across that border day and night and the libtards won’t do anything about it).

    It’ll be nice to get away from the rampant fear, paranoia and vaccine-coercion going on in CA. If you’ve ever seen people driving around alone while wearing face shield, eye goggles, three masks, Tyvek suit and nitrile gloves, you know you’re in Brainwashed Central.

    It seems that those who hold any power whatsoever over other people are the most brainwashed (or the most complicit)… human resources and management especially are immune to reason… show them dozens of peer-reviewed studies which show that the vaccines are doing more harm than good, show them quotes from virologists stating that even if the vaccines were 100% effective, they’d still be killing two people to save one life, and they’ll double-down on stupid.

    Where I used to work, they’re now requiring the third (booster) jab… despite the fact that one person has died from the vaccine, two have had infarctions and two are out long-term fighting a rash of adverse symptoms. They’re going to kill off their employees to the point that they can no longer function as a going concern… and I say, “Good!”.

    Those who were stupid enough to believe that their government (who funded creation of the virus) was a good source of information about their health (especially after the hundreds upon hundreds of ‘experiments’ the US government and military have carried out on unsuspecting citizens) deserve what they get, and the businesses doing that to their employees deserve to go out of business.

    That’s the only way Americans are ever going to wake up to the fact that their government considers them to be expendable slaves, there to only produce and consume as means of empowering and enriching those in government.

  141. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    boomie789 wrote:


    According to data from V-Safe Pregnancy Registry in the New England Journal of Medicine 2021, 827 pregnant women got the Covid19 jab. Of those 827, 104 were in the first trimester. Of those 104, 96 ended in miscarriage. That’s 92.3077%. What’s the average rate of first-trimester miscarriage, sans the Covid19 vaccine? Approximately 10%.

    Scared yet?

  142. boomie789 says:

    It makes me angry. It makes me want justice.

    Check out the comments.

  143. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    Fun fact: Moderna designed their vaccine only 48 hours after China published the genetic sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus on Jan. 11, 2020.

    Because relying upon a Communist country for the genetic sequence from which you develop a gene-therapy ‘vaccine’ is ok, right?

    I mean, it’s not like China has a forced sterilization program, it’s not like China would publish an intentionally ‘adjusted’ genetic sequence which would induce American and European pharmaceutical companies to produce gene-therapy ‘vaccines’ which significantly increase first-trimester miscarriage in the rest of the world, so China can gain an economic might and military might advantage, right?

    Of course, pregnancy uses protease inhibitors (PZP and A2ML1 among them) to induce maternal immunotolerance during pregnancy, so the fetus isn’t considered invasive by the mother’s body… the protease inhibitors modulate the pregnant body immune response. By ‘boosting’ immune response in the pregnant via the Covid19 ‘vaccines’, apparently especially in the first trimester, the body’s immune system attacks the fetus, inducing miscarriage.

    This is for the same reason that parvovirus, listeria, salmonella, rubella, HPV, bacterial vaginosis, UTI, gonorrhea… pretty much any infection… increases risk of miscarriage… because the pregnant body immune system goes on high alert and attacks the fetus.

  144. boomie789 says:


    “In this second interview we conducted with Catherine Austin Fitts, we dive deeper. Learn how the central bankers are using governments around the world to implement a new system that will ultimately lead to slavery. Once you see this, you will understand the importance to resist now, before it’s too late.”

  145. boomie789 says:

  146. Joseph E Postma says:

    You know, when I watch movies like the new Dune, or Jupiter Ascending, I get this strange sense of scale, this inner inkling of what it must be like to have total, basically infinite dominance over vast numbers of subjects, and I get this intuition or sense of the reality of such conditions. Anyone with such power is certainly going to develop society along such lines as an aristocratic class of ultimate might and power, extreme eugenics, self-mastery, order of magnitude higher IQ’s, power, etc. And then the rest of the people should be commoners and subjects anyway, given that they lack the intelligence let alone the ability to wield power. Our own Monarchs and our history with them is what we see in such movies, just scaled down to Earthly standards. But what if in the middle ages and at the height of the power of the Monarchies, the subjects witnessed great spaceships and conductions of ceremony displaying such ultimate power, such subjects would have certainly understood their own lack of significance, the life of a subject being basically completely insignificant and costless to extinguish. Why would subjects ever be given the access to technology which they neither understand or can develop themselves, expending such great quantities of resources and energy so that they can amuse themselves with the trivial, debased, and degenerate? Boomie you will appreciate how Eurpoean’s basically gave all of our technology away to people who literally were 10,000 years behind in development, still living in the stone age, with the highest technology being the stick – and now how has this turned out for Europe and its descendants? It begs the question: why would those with power EVER share the source of their power with people who lack it? How is there any possible justification for doing that? The answer is: you would only do that if you seek your own replacement and destruction.

    So what I begin to perceive in the schemes of the controllers is an engineering of our world to a state similar to what we see in those movies, where the commoners are deprived of high technology and mass energy usage, because why should they have access to these anyway? Picture the boomer with their speed boats, their vacations, their cruises, etc. Picture the 75 IQ beast operating a smart phone, driving a vehicle, flying around the world on an Airbus 380. It’s grotesque…grotesque expenditure of resources and energy and power for pointless and purposeless ends, merely for the amusement of animals. Here of course I reference the test with the gom jabar, to test if Paul is a human or an animal; most people would react like animals.

    It seems that for now, high technology and energy usage is being used to amuse people into a state of serfdom and slavery, at which point the technology and energy will slowly be removed until the people have been returned to a state of irreconcilable serfdom and slavery. What technology and energy usage will then remain will be only for maintenance of the state of mind of the serf as such. We have so many examples of this in our books and media of course: 1984, THX1138 movie, these other movies, etc.

    It becomes the responsibility of anyone with a family and children to ensure that their children are reared with high standards, ideally the highest standards, in mind.

    The control system and power benefits set up in this way isn’t inaccessible to everyone – accessibility to it becomes a function of intelligence, and intelligence is a function of breeding and cultivation. You can join the power structure if you wish. But why would anyone, ever, anywhere, be so incredibly naïve as to think that the power structure will give away its power given that this would only see the destruction of the structure? Look at me trying to publish that paper which would destroy the power structure of academia, for example.

    I am finding the ideas of egalitarianism to be more and more completely retarded and mid-witted than ever.

  147. boomie789 says:

    I know who these people are, I know where they live. I know the source of their power(banks). They are mortal same as me.

    I’m just a coonass in the swamp and I know what they are doing and why they are doing it. There are millions like me. We have a real chance to stop them here in the states. We have to speak truth at all cost.

    They are more afraid of me and those like me than I am of them. There are magnitudes more of me than there are of them. Their power is a fragile illusion.

  148. Joseph E Postma says:

    Yes it is, and we are lucky that we have had access to free media up to now.

    I get the sense of the ridicule the directory of Dune was making when the solitary bagpipe player shuffles out of the ship before the retinue when they arrive on Arrakis. I mean it is very subtle, and most people would likely simply see it as part of the royal ceremony…but there was something about the solitary player playing his solitary tune for a moment which gave away the ridiculousness of the power structure.

    Well, this is apparently the war of perspective between the Archons and the Phosters, hey Zelator?

    You CAN have a megalomaniacal power structure…sure. But you can also see that it’s ridiculous, and live a different way.

  149. boomie789 says:

    I haven’t watched Dune yet. I tried watching “Brazil” but couldn’t get into it. It was after I watched THX 1138.

    Sorry CD Marshall I think you recommend me that one. The tone wasn’t what I was in the mood for. Maybe I could like it on a different day.

  150. boomie789 says:

    O and if you pay really close attention to the very last shot of THX 1138 there is something I didn’t catch that changed my view of the ending.

  151. Zelator says:

    Phosters – Archons; the perspective? good cop bad cop. Control both sides and you can’t lose.
    I used to always think or hoped that the Phosters were the good guys, the Clint Eastwood of the Great White Brotherhood.

    Thing is we put a lot of distinction on the difference as opposed to the reality of the distinction.

    I think it’s important to understand their modus operandi. The Hegelian Dialectic.

    Thesis-antithesis-synthesis. Ok we all know it’s problem reaction solution, but its basis is Duality – thats the key to the madhouse.

    The gnostic viewpoint was the belief that if you believe in god, then you must believe in the devil.

    Agonist/antagonist it’s the perpetual struggle, between good and evil, darkness and light.

    Did you ever notice the illuminati had a dual identity. On the one hand the precise mathematical philosophy of existence againgt the Corona Party/Locust Party nasty, filth human hating alter ego.

    That’s why they worship the Black Sun. Everything is a mirror. As within so without, as above so below.

    It’s also why they on the one hand despise the body and see it as a disposabe meat suit, yet on the other hand say you can become a god.

    Cimmeria to Hyperborea. Intense darkess and cold to glorious god like existence in paradise.

    Even the greatest Philosophers were dualities:

    The Cabal, they are Aristotolian Oligarchs that despise Nation State and love zero growth. They want the staus quo, nothing to change.
    They make their money from wars, problem reaction solution. Rothschilds all over it.

    Aristotle (the materialist) individualism and pervayor of service to self promoter, asserted that slavery is a necessary institution, because some are born to rule and others to be ruled.

    This is in stark contgrast to Platonistic altruistic collectivism based on the principles of the Founding Fathers of the USA Republic.

    Once you know the rules of The Glass Bead Game, then you can become a player on this 3d world. Otherwise you are destined to be a slave.

    Of course its ridiculous. This is dantes inferno. The divine comedy.

  152. Zelator says:

    With regards to that Catherine Austin Fitts video, she confirmed what I reported of the WEF 2020 reset.
    She says she was part of the Bush Government. She knows that Bush just like Trump
    found out they can’t control the Back End of the Quantum AI. Because its a Quantum Etherical System and not binary.

    Without that they can’t access the real money. They can play with the Black Mirror
    but without back access they are fucked. All systems have a front and back end.

    Bitcoin is run out of Wuhan. It is artificially jacked up just like all the Fiat Currency and
    Stocks and Shares on the world markets.

    When they pull the plug, just like they will do, it will be to implode the economy aka the Great Reset.

    Like I said in prior post they destroy economies not build them up. Thats just how they make their money.

  153. Zelator says:

    Sorry WEF2030 . Although it has already begun. I have been watching the markets closely for the last few months and they are definitely rigged and trading within parameters. They are waiting to pull the trigger. I fear a lot of people are going to get burned. If you hold stocks be careful/

  154. Zelator says:

    Talking about dystopian movies, I watched Soylent Green yesterday. That’s another prophetic movie. You can watch that also on Odysee.

  155. Zelator says:

    Boomie I too never got into Brazil. I never finished it either and need to re-watch it sometime.

  156. boomie789 says:

  157. boomie789 says:

  158. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    I couldn’t get into THX 1138. I get the feeling that in the interest of movie length (or economics), they left an awful lot of context on the cutting room floor, while keeping scenes that didn’t move the narrative along. A lot of scenes of running, hiding and dodging, narrated by disjointed announcements that only seemed to coincide with the action occasionally. But then, it was Lucas’ first foray into directing a full-length feature film, his first short film (Electronic Labyrinth: THX 1138 4EB) adapted to a full-length movie, and Lucas was only 25 years old. The audio company THX, Ltd. was named after the film.

    I think this film is due for a remake… with all the years of experience Lucas has directing, it’d likely be popular.

  159. boomie789 says:

  160. It would make a good remake for sure!!

  161. boomie789 says:

    No no no Lucas shouldn’t direct it. Lucas is an ideas man and admits he hates directing. Let some one else write and direct it. imo. Like I said it’s a 7/10 in practice, 10/10 in spirit.

  162. boomie789 says:

    Lucas can help fund it though of course. It would have to be low budget I imagine. It wouldn’t be a blockbuster, I think. I really doubt Lucas would be interested in that endeavor at all. He doesn’t care about making those types of movies. That spirit he had when he made THX 1138 is long gone.

  163. boomie789 says:

  164. MP says:

    Dr Robert Holmes promoted your work JP

  165. boomie789 says:

  166. boomie789 says:

    “We would rather kill you than be fiscally responsible and practice sound banking”

    Basically the world right now.

  167. boomie789 says:

  168. Joseph E Postma says:

  169. boomie789 says:


    Is Jesus the son of God, or more self-fulfilling prophecies? Either way, the Christians saw this coming.

  170. Joseph E Postma says:

    Wow Boomie.

  171. boomie789 says:


  172. Joseph E Postma says:


    And yes, I mean you look at Revelation 18:23, it really seems like it had it figured out:

    Revelations 18:23: “And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived. “

    Strong’s Concordance defines “sorceries” as word 5331:

    From G5332; medication (“pharmacy”), that is, (by extension) magic (literal or figurative): – sorcery, witchcraft.”
    G5332: far-mak-yoos’ From φάρμακον pharmakon (a drug, that is, spell giving potion); a druggist (“pharmacist”) or poisoner, that is, (by extension) a magician: – sorcerer.

  173. Joseph E Postma says:

    Holy cow guys read this quote:

    Václav Havel, a political dissident in the Communist Czechoslovak Socialist Republic who went on to become the President of Czechoslovakia after the fall of the Communist Regime

    “The post-totalitarian system touches people at every step, but it does so with its ideological gloves on. This is why life in the system is so thoroughly permeated with hypocrisy and lies: government by bureaucracy is called popular government; the working class is enslaved in the name of the working class; the complete degradation of the individual is presented as his or her ultimate liberation; depriving people of information is called making it available; the use of power to manipulate is called the public control of power; and the arbitrary abuse of power is called observing legal code; the repression of culture is called its development; the expansion of imperial influence is presented as support for the oppressed; the lack of free expression becomes the highest form of freedom; farcical elections become the highest form of democracy; banning independent thought becomes the most scientific of world views; military occupation becomes fraternal assistance. Because the regime is captive to its own lies, it must falsify everything.”

  174. Joseph E Postma says:

    Perhaps one of the most stunningly accurate things Havel describes is the Communist society’s utter lack of morality.

    “The profound crisis of human identity brought on by living within a lie, a crisis which in turn makes such a life possible, certainly possesses a moral dimension as well; it appears, among other things, as a deep moral crisis in society. A person who has been seduced by the consumer value system, whose identity is dissolved in an amalgam of the accoutrements of mass civilization, and who has no roots in the order of being, no sense of responsibility for anything higher than his or her own personal survival, is a demoralized person. The system depends on demoralization, deepens it, is in fact a projection of it into society.”

  175. boomie789 says:

  176. Richard says:

    Joe, could you comment on William Happer’s statement that doubling the amount of CO2 will result in a temperature change of about 0,8 °C? You can find this at the end of the presentation he gave recently at the Eike institute in Germany.

  177. Hi Richard,

    Yes that statement from Happer is still based on the climate greenhouse effect idea…most skeptics simply state that the warming is small, rather than the entire theory being senseless from the beginning – most will not go that far, as I have proven it to be the case.

    Is is PURELY speculative…the 0.8C. Purely theoretical that is, which thus depends upon the quality of the theory. And as we know, the quality of the theory is not only lacking, but is entirely divorced from reality. 0.8C is noise in any case.

  178. boomie789 says:

    Had a little spat with that guy on here. I think it’s a little funny.

  179. Joseph E Postma says:

    I commented at one spot yesterday…reddit threads are difficult to track I find. I’ll see if it is worth inserting anything anywhere…but this freak you have there is a complete psycho.

  180. boomie789 says:

  181. Joseph E Postma says:

    haha 🙂

  182. Richard says:

    Is this Eike institute in Germany a suitable entrance in Europe? You could also contact the website climategate.nl in the Netherlands. There is also the organisation Clintel, they call themselves the Climate Intelligence Foundation.
    I am very curious how they would react on your statements and insights..

  183. Hi Richard,

    I am not sure about the first two, but the Clintel I have had extensive comm’s with and they know my position – their problem is that they’re worried about not being seen as legitimate if they take too hardline of approach. Everyone seems to have such a difficult time with just stating the damned facts, because the Great Lie has them.

  184. boomie789 says:

  185. Joseph E Postma says:

    I agree with this reply:

    “We should be raising the age, not lowering it. An IQ test wouldn’t hurt as well.”

    But of course, we’re on a path to complete destruction in clown world…so…there’s that.

  186. boomie789 says:

  187. Joseph E Postma says:


  188. John Salamito says:

    I like Happer a great deal, and he does know his stuff but like many others they seem to start from the position of accepting that cold things can heat hot things. I simply can’t understand why clever sensible, even brilliant, scientists like Happer do this. It is totally baffling.

  189. It is baffling absolutely. And disappointing.

  190. MP says:

    @ boomie789 says: 2021/12/01 at 10:51 AM

    Germany introduced female voting rights in 1918. Hitlers rise to power began in 1919

    Females seem very easy to manipulate to vote for totalitarian Marxist regimes. Children even more

  191. boomie789 says:

    lol, I was going to pass on posting this but now I can’t. Married women vote what their husbands vote for. But yes I agree.


    “School textbooks say that Russian women obtained suffrage in the USSR in 1917. Thus it seems that women were given the right to vote by Vladimir Lenin and the Bolsheviks, who had overthrown and killed the tsar in establishing the Soviet state.”

    Hitler was about as Anti-Marxist as you can be, literally the Polar opposite. But, he was a Priest at heart who knew how to pull on the emotions of women just the same. Yes, women can be manipulated into Marxist regimes, women can be manipulated into Fascist or National Socialist regimes, women can be manipulated in general, it is their nature.

    For some reason, we were manipulated in the USA to help the communist when none of it at all was our business. Probably because the same people Hitler removed from German media were, and are, in control of our media and sympathetic to the communist cause. Which is the cause America helped.

  192. boomie789 says:

  193. Zelator says:

    Boomie the crab eating away happily, as it is unknowingly being prepared as food, is about as true for humans as you can possibly get. Hunted for dinner,,,,,,Just ask Kleck.!!!
    If you don’t believe we are being decimated, abused, sucked dry, both emotionally and physically, then you may just as well be Soylent Green, as you are their next fucking tasty snack. However for those of us awake, I much prefer not to be some fucking demons dinner. OK!!!!

  194. Zelator says:

    Its still in moderation.

  195. Joseph E Postma says:

    Speaking of Soylent Green, I watched that movie last night. It takes place THIS YEAR…this is the time frame of the movie!

    Very disturbing movie. Good movie.

  196. boomie789 says:

    Yea I need to check that one out.

    Soylent Green.

  197. Zelator says:

    Thanks Joe. Seems blood and sacrifice is an ongoing thing with these sickos. Wonder whether its behind all the mythology of vampires and werewolves?

    Then there is adenochrome and all that shit. Some say the soul is in the blood. I think Kleck has got closest to who they are. I believe they are demonic fallen angels more than aliens though.

    I have information on that, which I will put together for a post some time in the near future.

  198. boomie789 says:

    It’s gone now whatever it was.

  199. TEWS_Pilot says:

    Have any of you heard the news? The science is now settled. “Fact Checkers” have determined that Climate change theory is compatible with laws of thermodynamics…/sarc>

    Anyone care to “Fact Check” the “Fact Checkers?”

  200. Oh lord…@tews….ugh…

  201. The USA Today story gets it totally wrong. Radiation from CO2 or from any other molecule in the atmosphere will not reheat the original source of the infrared radiation. The reason should be quite clear, it is all about compatible frequency. As the article apply describes the radiation from the Sun is not compatible with CO2 so it has NO effect. The infrared radiation from the surfaces on the planet are at a much lower frequency and very weak. Only a very small amount of infrared from the Earth’s surfaces is compatible with CO2 a peak of 15 microns produced from materials some minus 60 degrees C. And that’s a FACT.

  202. TEWS_Pilot says:

    Thank you, Malcolm. The USA Today article was posted by a Climate Alarmist in a comment on one of the articles at CFACT. He is addicted to the AGW “Fool-aid” and believes every bit of the junk science “GlowBULL Warming” hoax. It is frustrating trying to educate him, and I think it is an impossible task.

  203. TEWS_Pilot says:

    Joe, I share your frustration.

  204. John Salamito says:

    Yes, so if there is some floating ice at -65C then it will be heated to -60C by the atmospheric CO2 that was heated by a say -18C surface.

  205. In combating illogic arguments one needs to extrapolate i.e. if the USA story is to be believed it would mean that any form of radiation would have a warming effect on any other radiative body. Say the human body radiates a temperature of around 36 degrees C . So any other radiation regardless of its radiative power would cause a body to warm. And so on and so forth, each body continuing to increase in temperature ad infinitum.

  206. Joseph E Postma says:

    From the article tews linked:

    “Post misinterprets climate change theory
    Researchers say the post misstates a basic principle of climate change theory.

    “No one’s claimed, ever, that CO2 generates heat,” Josh Willis, a climate scientist at NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, told USA TODAY. “CO2 traps heat, it doesn’t generate heat.”

    “The ultimate thing that happens is more heat stays on the Earth and less gets out to space,” said Willis.

    Our rating: False
    Based on our research, we rate FALSE the claim that the laws of thermodynamics say CO2 can’t contribute to climate change. Climate change theory isn’t related to CO2 trapping heat itself, it’s asserting that CO2 directs radiation to earth that would otherwise escape into space. The laws of thermodynamics are completely compatible with climate change theory, according to experts.”

    God help us. We need to get out of this fn place…away from these people.

  207. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    Joseph E Postma wrote:
    “God help us. We need to get out of this fn place…away from these people.”

    That’s what I said back in the SF Bay Area. And we did. Get out, that is.

    We’re in Kemah, TX right now, we rented a B&B for a couple weeks while I look for employment.

    We were bombing through the hills of West Texas at 110 MPH, 5 miles west of Van Horn, TX, and my wife’s car had a catastrophic blowout of a rear tire… both sidewalls of the tire were just gone… nothing but cords left. Those tires were only 3 years old, and we checked tire pressure each time we fueled up… her car is just so heavy that while it can get up to 110 MPH, the tires just can’t handle it. She’s had a blowout before, so I suspect the tire pressure on the inside door frame is lower than it should be… but she won’t let me increase her tire pressure to the sidewall-rated pressure like I do for my vehicle… that reduces sidewall flexing and heat buildup.

    I was already a couple miles ahead of her in my car. I noticed she’d vanished from my rear-view, so I pulled over. She called me, told me of the blowout, and I had to back along the shoulder for a couple miles to get back to her, my GPS blaring at me the whole time “You’re going the wrong direction! You’re going the wrong direction!” LOL

    Texas Highway Patrol rolled up just as I was torquing the lugnuts on the emergency spare. They called into the Napa store at Van Horn and found a tire for us, then slowly escorted us into Van Horn to get the tire. Then we went to a garage down the street to mount the new tire on the rim, then we hit the road again… slower this time, since we had 3 now-suspect tires and one new tire. We limped along at 75 MPH into San Antonio, went to Costco, and got new shoes for my wife’s old horse, then we hit the road again.

    Contrast that to California Highway Patrol… they would have rolled up, immediately requested back-up, 4 other patrol vehicles would have rolled up, they would have shut down one lane of the freeway for a half-mile either direction, then they would have demanded our ‘papers’ and searched the vehicle, then confiscated anything valuable via Civil Asset Forfeiture. Upon learning that we were not only not vaccinated, but that we were escaping the loony-bin of the SF Bay Area and that we’re conservative, we likely would have been ‘escorted’ straight into (at the minimum) a long ‘detention’.

    Anyway, I’ve ‘adjusted’ my vehicle for maximum efficiency… I bought the car used with only 9 miles on it (it was a dealership loaner car, but with a manual transmission, no one wanted to drive it) for 1/3 the price of a new car. I searched long and hard for just the right car… the highest (at the time) reliability rating, lean-burn engine, no A/C, a manual transmission, no stereo, nothing fancy… less stuff to break down and less weight. When you’re driving, you should drive, not pay attention to a bunch of computer doohickeys. I lucked out when I found this car.

    As soon as I got it home, I changed the oil, then took it out on the highway for a hard break-in (you can look up how to do a hard break-in… basically it’s “drive it like you stole it”) to get excellent ring-seal. Then I changed the oil again, and did the hard break-in procedure again, while misting water into the engine intake to increase cylinder pressure from the steam formed when that water flashed to steam in the cylinder.

    Then I changed the oil again and started driving it normally, changing the oil at 500 miles, 1000 miles, 2000 miles, 4000 miles, 8000 miles and every 5000 after that. At 28000 miles, I switched from dino oil to synthetic, ran it for 5000 miles and did an oil analysis to get a baseline on engine wear, ran it another 5000 miles and did another oil analysis, then I started putting WS2 in the oil.

    I put 0.5 micron tungsten disulfide in the synthetic engine oil (1 level tablespoon per quart for the first time, 1 level teaspoon per quart for every oil change after that), in the manual transmission gear oil (1 level tablespoon per quart) and in the wheel bearing grease (10 level tablespoons per tube of grease… it’s messy mixing it and putting it back into the tube, use gloves); I keep my tires inflated to the sidewall pressure rating rather than the pressure specified on the inside of the door frame, and I set the front end toe-in to 0 degrees.

    The 0 degree toe-in reduces rolling friction, but makes it flighty at between 70 MPH and 100 MPH… below that, the going is slow enough that steering doesn’t require much attention, and above 100 MPH aerodynamics take over and keeps it straight and narrow, but between 70 MPH and 100 MPH, it’s like dancing on the head of a pin… you have to stay concentrated on driving.

    The tungsten disulfide (one of the most lubricious substances known to man) reduces friction and eliminates engine wear… the tungsten disulfide becomes the wear point, and as it wears off, it’s replenished by more of it in the oil. Oil analysis shows there’s zero wear, so this engine should last a really long time, and the low friction means I have to feather on and off the throttle at 80 MPH, and tapping the pedal down just a tiny bit makes it jump to 110 MPH.

    Mine is the only 1.4 L engine I know of that can red-line in top gear… I wish I had a sixth gear, it could definitely pull it. I was pulling up those steep West Texas hills at 110 MPH and I was barely pressing the accelerator. 40 MPG at 110 MPH. Not bad.

    Anyway, now to find employment and a place to live. Later, everyone.

  208. TEWS_Pilot says:

    Joe, I can’t even begin to describe how ignorant of basic physics Josh Willis, a climate scientist at NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory is. He probably doesn’t even know how many degrees of freedom the CO2 molecule has or which ones are responsible for motion, translation, expansion and contraction, radiation or other energy functions……ugh, indeed.

    As a contrast, when I was an undergraduate physics student in college in the 1960s working as an intern on the NASA Apollo program where we put men on the moon and returned them safely several times, the lead for the unit I was assigned to was 29 years old and held THREE Ph.D.s

  209. TEWS_Pilot says:

    OK, now I can see why NASA doesn’t have a clue about Climate science or anything remotely related to their original mission:

    US Space Academies Prioritize ‘Diversity’ And ‘Inclusion’ As China Prepares To Eclipse The US In Space

  210. It’s making the point that our entire academic science system is retarded and has gone completely to heck. We had funds from the Canadian Space Agency ready to be approved to begin work on a next generation UV Space telescope…the university, not the government but the university, rejected the approval because we didn’t state how the telescope would help climate change and transgenders…they had no scientific objection, but “policy” objection.

    It’s over. It’s really all over.

  211. Nah, it’s great though, the current system should absolutely destroy itself and we shouldn’t stop it from doing so…like myself with that paper for example.

    When it collapses, We can rebuild from the ashes…they cannot.

  212. LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks says:

    Atlas is shrugging… at least in the blue states.

  213. TEWS_Pilot says:

    Ha, ha, ha, “LOL_KKK,” I think Atlas must be MOON WALKING by now…….Watch this video for an eye opener. It is about 9 minutes.

  214. boomie789 says:

    @LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks

    Godspeed. You are a brilliant man.

  215. Sean says:

    The lower right diagram of the six in the “Foundation of Climate Science” image illustrates the primary reason why I find the entire premise ludicrous. You look at the energy transfer arrows on the right side of the diagram, and the premise that the atmosphere, heated by radiation from the ground, will preferentially re-radiate more energy back down to the ground than up to the sky violates everything I was taught about thermodynamics. If you heat an object, it’s going to radiate that heat equally in all directions.

  216. TEWS_Pilot says:

    Commenter “Adam”….apparently a Canadian
    This isn’t funny.

    I am looking for help in filing criminal charges here in Canada against these politicians for practicing medicine without a license. Now they are forcing people to reveal their “vaccinated” status by wearing a Yellow tag on the outside of their coats in order to board public trains.

    Please share my blog with anyone who might help, thank you.


  217. MP says:

    Dr. Andrew Kaufman – Theorizing Viruses as Exosomes

    Exosomes are essential to health because they carry toxins out of sick cells and trigger the immune system to attack the cause of the illness. The cause is not the messenger, but something that is injuring the body. Typically, that is toxicity in food, air, water, drugs, electromagnetic exposure, or old age. Any of these cause exosomes to get to work. The significance of this is that the global campaign to identify and kill a dreaded virus is, not only futile, it will cause even more illness triggered by cellular trauma from toxic medications and vaccines.


  218. Hi Jo
    Thanks so much for your effects to assemble some clear thinking in this World.

    I am not aware that you have an essay on Venus and the cause of its surface temperature. I may be wrong if so could you provide a link.
    I was watching this video { The Greenhouse Effect Explained }

    In it there is an explanation why Venus is as it is.

    If you haven’t already done so would you care to tackle the topic?


  219. MP says:

    @ Malcolm Hornsby

    The Venus question busts the whole climate scence theory

    The work of Nikolov and Zeller proofs that plannets with an atmosphere above 0.1 bar follow the gas laws temperature wise

    The work of `1000Frolly (Dr Robert Holmes) took it a step further.

    1 Bar atmosphere acts the same as a virtual blackbody in space, in terms of temperature related to the 4th root of the TSI at the TOA

  220. Yes I have read their works years ago. I was hoping that Jo would have a crack at it as well.

  221. Joseph E Postma says:

    An engineer I know from my work in aerospace sent me this document which he wrote independently in response to the “experiment” of the OP. Anyone interested in the details of this OP will greatly appreciate the read here – not too long:

    Click to access kp-a-simple-experiment.pdf

  222. CD Marshall says:

    Might want to remove the email at the end lots of trolls read your posts

  223. K. Pritchett says:

    Still no response from the team that authored the original…ahem…paper. Sent it on the 26th. I’ll keep you all posted if they ever do respond to my critique.

  224. The absurdity of greenhouse effect could be demonstrated in much easier way. Let’s consider thin layer of atmosphere, say 50 meters in height. It is obvious that such thin layer of air has approximately the same temperature as the surface of the Earth. The heating taking place by direct contact with the surface and by convection.
    The climate models treated Earth’s atmosphere as black body. We could do the same assumption and our layer of air is as black as carbon dioxide is. Please note that our atmospheric layer does not contain anything from so-called greenhouse gases family. Although the layer is completely transparent to radiant heat of Earth, it emits black body radiation being at the temperature of 14C (average temperature of Earth).
    Now I am going to repeat the phrase from greenhouse effect description: half of this radiation going up and half is going down. According to Stefan-Boltzmann law, power radiated by black body is proportional to the fourth power of the temperature.
    For our layer of air this power equals to 384 Watts per square meter. Half of this energy will be heading down, which makes radiative forcing out of thin air equals to 192 Watts per square meter!
    This is 87 times more compare to radiative forcing of carbon dioxide. We all going to fry.
    Something obviously is rotten in state of climate science and quantum physics. The calculations using Stefan-Boltzmann formula are not correspond to the reality. Stefan-Boltzmann law could not be used for the radiation of gases.

  225. Leon says:

    Hi guys,

    Been awhile since I meandered this topic but I’ve been having this reoccurring need to revisit an old idea. I would like to build out the earth’s energy budget into a real life, demonstrable model designed entirely out of pulleys, gears, levers and spring scales on a miniature scale. Mostly, just for something to do as a hobby.

    It would take on the Trenberth theme and have a crank representing the sun to power the entire design. Gears would represent variables such as latent heat, evaporation etc, pulleys for the climate which activate spring scales etc. Along with balance scales as well using various weights in grams which can be added on the fly to test changes. I think you get the idea.

    Can someone tell me this is a crazy idea and I should just forget it. Way too complicated. It won’t be fun and I will just be wasting my time. And I’ll need to have a phd in physics to know what I’m doing.

  226. That would be a work of mechanical genius. It can be done in computer code more easily likely. But then again, either way, you face the scaling to the chaos problem of the real system.

  227. Leon says:

    “That would be a work of mechanical genius.”
    That’s what I was afraid of. Ideally, it would be fun to start with just a simple crank, gear, pulley and a dial to show how fast you’re cranking rpm to represent sun’s energy in watts. And make every modular piece work independently to snap into place. Much like coding functions (). it would be neat to watch it work. And it would be big when completed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s