An INTJ would demand that their math always be ontological, whereas an ISTJ can’t define anything about reality at all and believes that mathematics is an inexplicable miraculous coincidence which has no justification to correspond with reality (LOL!!).
Thus, who’s usage of mathematics would freely permit any absurdity including that of flat Earth theory in modern physics, and who’s usage of mathematics would necessitate correspondence with both empirical and rational reality?
An ISTJ uses mathematics about energy all day long, but has absolutely 100% no concept nor justification nor explanation of what energy is, whereas an INTJ can perfectly define energy and the definition 100% explains why it should be mathematical in the first place, and why it is therefore no miracle at all as to why empirical existence behaves mathematically and follows mathematical prescriptions.
Enjoy the rant!
Discuss with friends at WordPress:
or join the group “Classical Illuminism” on Facebook