New book dropped today!
If you wish to understand the religion of the Illuminati, try starting here.
Enjoy! I’d really appreciate you all to read it.
New book dropped today!
If you wish to understand the religion of the Illuminati, try starting here.
Enjoy! I’d really appreciate you all to read it.
Video blurb:
@ JP
You described the concept of God as a collective of inner and outer circlings and frequencies
How would you describe the concept of evil within these terms?
Evil is disorganized circlings. Evil is making disorganized circlings more disorganized yet, which reduces your power.
Good is organizing your circlings.
How would you define the concept of dreaming? A feedback from high frequency inner circlings, or should i see it as a wider concept?
Yes, that’s a good way to look at it. Look at what your mind does when it dreams: It creates entire realities, with people speaking lines, sometimes people you know and sometimes people you do not know, but they have their unique lines and while inside the dream it seems entirely real.
What kind of mind would be capable of producing that level of detail? That’s the “second mind” inside you, which can do that, because it literally would take a “God” to be able to create such detailed worlds…and indeed it does do so.
The first step which alchemists and other types of adepts recommend, is upon waking to write down all of your dreams. This will begin to help you remember them in more detail in the future, and then, you may begin to notice patterns, messages which can be read in them, etc. This is how your “God mind” communicates with you, at the base level when you’re not trying. But with practice in writing down your dreams, eventually you will become lucid in your dreams and control them, and then eventually you will become super-lucid and then have out of body experiences, and then really the fun begins. That’s where the Illumined are to be found.
So in terms of Pi and mirrored Pi when sleeping the inner mirror Pi gives feedback to Pi
Something like that?
Yea metaphorically speaking, not directly ontological