In the previous two posts (first, second) we have looked at the climate alarmist’s “steel greenhouse” which they mathematically solve in such a way as to lead to what they think is an alarming behaviour about temperature, which they call … Continue reading
Categories
-
Join 540 other subscribers
- Follow Climate of Sophistry on WordPress.com
Recent Comments
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- J Cuttance on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Nepal on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- donaldgisbey on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Alex Janssen on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- donaldgisbey on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Robert Kernodle on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Robert Kernodle on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
