I asked the people at LaRouchePAC to read the book Gödel Versus Wittgenstein, and was given this in reply: “I read a couple of chapters of it, but his writing style included many interesting concepts and conclusions that didn’t compel belief. … Continue reading
Categories
-
Join 545 other subscribers
- Follow Climate of Sophistry on WordPress.com
Recent Comments
- CD Marshall on Introduction to the CLIMATE – new book!
- Joseph E Postma on Introduction to the CLIMATE – new book!
- CD Marshall on Introduction to the CLIMATE – new book!
- Joseph E Postma on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- CD Marshall on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- CD Marshall on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- CD Marshall on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Alex Janssen on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Alex Janssen on Leaving out Sunshine
- Alex Janssen on Leaving out Sunshine
- Alex Janssen on Leaving out Sunshine
- Joseph E Postma on Leaving out Sunshine
- Alex Janssen on Leaving out Sunshine
- DIN on Introduction to the CLIMATE – new book!
- CD Marshall on Introduction to the CLIMATE – new book!