A viewer sent in a question with a concern over how “nothing” constitutes a better answer to existence than “randomness”? Isn’t “nothing” just a parallel answer, similarly devoid of ontology, that doesn’t actually inform us of anything more than randomness … Continue reading
Categories
-
Join 482 other followers
- Follow Climate of Sophistry on WordPress.com
Recent Comments
- boomie789 on Illuminism Under Threat
- boomie789 on Illuminism Under Threat
- boomie789 on Illuminism Under Threat
- CD Marshall on Illuminism Under Threat
- TEWS_Pilot on Illuminism Under Threat
- CD Marshall on Illuminism Under Threat
- CD Marshall on Illuminism Under Threat
- Joseph E Postma on Illuminism Under Threat
- Joseph E Postma on Illuminism Under Threat
- Joseph E Postma on Illuminism Under Threat
- Joseph E Postma on Illuminism Under Threat
- Joseph E Postma on Illuminism Under Threat
- CD Marshall on Illuminism Under Threat
- TEWS_Pilot on Illuminism Under Threat
- TEWS_Pilot on Illuminism Under Threat
Climate of Sophistry 