Enjoy this response to Michael Merrifield who thinks that flat Earth physics which debunks climate alarmism and the field of climate science in general as a legitimate field of science is in fact a great way to do physics. Michael, … Continue reading
Categories
-
Join 540 other subscribers
- Follow Climate of Sophistry on WordPress.com
Recent Comments
- J Cuttance on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Nepal on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- donaldgisbey on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Alex Janssen on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- donaldgisbey on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Robert Kernodle on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Robert Kernodle on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on The State of Climate Sophistry
- Alex Janssen on The State of Climate Sophistry
- Joseph E Postma on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Robert Kernodle on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Alex Janssen on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect