I keep on seeing the phrase from alarmists, warmists, and luke-warmists, of this initiating assumption that, in order to conserve energy in the greenhouse diagrams and the related K-T Energy budget, you set the power input equal to the power … Continue reading
Categories
-
Join 540 other subscribers
- Follow Climate of Sophistry on WordPress.com
Recent Comments
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- CD Marshall on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- J Cuttance on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Nepal on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- donaldgisbey on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Alex Janssen on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- donaldgisbey on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Robert Kernodle on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter

