The following is a short email sequence I shared with Anthony Watts last night over the defeat of his “challenge” to PSI and his subsequent experiment which he didn’t understand and with which he tried to ignore the answer to … Continue reading
Categories
-
Join 540 other subscribers
- Follow Climate of Sophistry on WordPress.com
Recent Comments
- Joseph E Postma on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Nepal on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- donaldgisbey on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Alex Janssen on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- donaldgisbey on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Robert Kernodle on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Robert Kernodle on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on The State of Climate Sophistry
- Alex Janssen on The State of Climate Sophistry
- Joseph E Postma on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Robert Kernodle on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter
- Joseph E Postma on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Alex Janssen on Sophistry Part 2: “Analogously, but Different”, or why the IPCC Lies, or how the IPCC Disproves the Greenhouse Effect
- Joseph E Postma on Postma’s Thermodynamic Climate Interpreter